Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo-Jacobs Deal in Play, No 50-50 For Golovkin

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fullers
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 263
    • 38
    • 10
    • 8,268

    #381
    Originally posted by BigStomps
    I've never been married so never had marital problems in my life. But I keep it real punk!
    You the sensitive little biitch who's all butthurt cause Triple g isn't getting the money he thinks he's entitled too and Canelo isn't showing him the respect he thinks he deserves..... 😅😆
    This is boxing Fool! It's a business!
    Respect has nothing to do with it.
    Remember that you dumb fucc!
    Ah I should have guessed you've never been married. Maybe women just aren't interested in guys like you who model themselves on Ike Turner, who are illiterate. I'm assuming women anyway, but thinking about it, probably more likely you're looking for a man. "I keep it real punk", lol, you sound like a mix between a middle aged try hard and Mr T. Anyway I've got work now, and you've got job queue to join. Enjoy your day. Good luck getting that elusive job tiger.

    Comment

    • BigStomps
      Banned
      • Sep 2016
      • 7829
      • 259
      • 1
      • 82,514

      #382
      Originally posted by fullers
      Ah I should have guessed you've never been married. Maybe women just aren't interested in guys like you who model themselves on Ike Turner, who are illiterate. I'm assuming women anyway, but thinking about it, probably more likely you're looking for a man. "I keep it real punk", lol, you sound like a mix between a middle aged try hard and Mr T. Anyway I've got work now, and you've got job queue to join. Enjoy your day. Good luck getting that elusive job tiger.
      I've never been married cause I'm one of the few smart ones you dumb fucc! So me not being married is by choice.
      I've fucced plenty of married women in my lifetime, still am in fact. I've had biitches like you willing to leave their husbands and kids for me. That's how I roll punk!
      When your an independent, hardworking, good looking guy like myself then there's never any shortage of women for me.
      So me knowing how much of a slut most women really are, why would I wanna marry one?
      I've got a good job, my own house and three cars so I'm set. I don't need a biitch for anything other than sex!

      Your still a punk ass loser living in your momma's basement and living off welfare. You aren't on my level punk so stay off my **** you little biitch!

      Comment

      • Snoop Frog
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • May 2015
        • 992
        • 279
        • 519
        • 21,945

        #383
        Originally posted by Shadoww702
        70/30 is where it started so it had to of gone up from there? As ESPN said Oscar, Canelo, and even LOEFFLER were coming up with a compromise And its GGG refusing to do 50/50. So the Sept. rematch not happening is ALL on GGG. Just like the May fight being ALL on Canelo.

        Either way Im not gonna cry over spilled milk. Jacobs vs. Canelo is PERFECTLY fine with me. Plus Jacobs is an all around good guy who has a heck of a good story to tell. So im GLAD he got the fight and deserves it.

        Now lets see which way GGG goes? Charlo, Sergiy, or the usual Bum/Tomato Can.
        Spot on regarding both being at fault for fight #2 not happening (yet, hopefully).

        GGG fought the #1 (Canelo) and #2 (Jacobs) available fighters back to back in his division, and I'm struggling to think of other fighters in the past few years who've done that. Gassiev will be fighting at least the #1 available (Usyk) and fought the #2/#3 available (Dorticos). The guys who've fought #1, #2, or top notch fighters back to back are great company for GGG, either way. I think a soft touch (Vanes) is reasonable after those two fights, although fighting a MW would have made more sense for a MW fighter.

        Comment

        • icha
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 9506
          • 328
          • 368
          • 78,629

          #384
          Originally posted by Snoop Frog
          Spot on regarding both being at fault for fight #2 not happening (yet, hopefully).

          GGG fought the #1 (Canelo) and #2 (Jacobs) available fighters back to back in his division, and I'm struggling to think of other fighters in the past few years who've done that. Gassiev will be fighting at least the #1 available (Usyk) and fought the #2/#3 available (Dorticos). The guys who've fought #1, #2, or top notch fighters back to back are great company for GGG, either way. I think a soft touch (Vanes) is reasonable after those two fights, although fighting a MW would have made more sense for a MW fighter.
          canelo fought trout and flyd back to back and then lara not much later... the jacobs fight was enforced and canelo fight was for the money, canelo fought floyd for the money too but his fights with trout and lara were considered legit high risk low reward fights...

          Comment

          • Shadoww702
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2015
            • 41176
            • 4,546
            • 2,938
            • 250,035

            #385
            Originally posted by Snoop Frog
            Spot on regarding both being at fault for fight #2 not happening (yet, hopefully).

            GGG fought the #1 (Canelo) and #2 (Jacobs) available fighters back to back in his division, and I'm struggling to think of other fighters in the past few years who've done that. Gassiev will be fighting at least the #1 available (Usyk) and fought the #2/#3 available (Dorticos). The guys who've fought #1, #2, or top notch fighters back to back are great company for GGG, either way. I think a soft touch (Vanes) is reasonable after those two fights, although fighting a MW would have made more sense for a MW fighter.
            Acutally that Jaime/GGG fight would of been AWESOME I bet... Damn shame. But hindsight is 20/20

            Comment

            • Snoop Frog
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • May 2015
              • 992
              • 279
              • 519
              • 21,945

              #386
              Originally posted by icha
              canelo fought trout and flyd back to back and then lara not much later... the jacobs fight was enforced and canelo fight was for the money, canelo fought floyd for the money too but his fights with trout and lara were considered legit high risk low reward fights...
              That was a great 4 fight stretch for Canelo (Trout in 2013, Floyd in 2013, Angulo in 2014, and Lara in 2014). Canelo definitely earned his respect and A side status.

              Comment

              • Snoop Frog
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • May 2015
                • 992
                • 279
                • 519
                • 21,945

                #387
                Originally posted by Shadoww702
                Acutally that Jaime/GGG fight would of been AWESOME I bet... Damn shame. But hindsight is 20/20
                Yeah, man, that would have been awesome.

                Comment

                • BattlingNelson
                  Mod a Phukka
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 29838
                  • 3,245
                  • 3,190
                  • 286,536

                  #388
                  Originally posted by Verus
                  I don't think that Canelo will get a bigger purse fighting Jacobs. I said, "Both will make good money." So you expect Canelo to drain Jacobs to 155 lbs for the fight. I will take you at your word. I see that reading and reasoning are not your strong suits.
                  So Canelo-GGG 2 was allegedly a 100M USD fight. Even with a 50/50 split and a PPV against Jacobs, I’m confident that Canelo will goodbye to a truckload of money. How much is Jacobs fight worth for Canelo? 5-10M? I don’t know, but Canelo and GBP will kiss a truckload of money goodbye.

                  Comment

                  • icha
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 9506
                    • 328
                    • 368
                    • 78,629

                    #389
                    Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                    So Canelo-GGG 2 was allegedly a 100M USD fight. Even with a 50/50 split and a PPV against Jacobs, I’m confident that Canelo will goodbye to a truckload of money. How much is Jacobs fight worth for Canelo? 5-10M? I don’t know, but Canelo and GBP will kiss a truckload of money goodbye.
                    the thing is at his age canelo can afford that, in fact he already did in the past by leaving negotiations with cotto only to go and fight kirkland... in the other hand ggg isnt in the same situation ...
                    ggg is no bigger name than cotto was , canelo wont hesitate to show him the middle finger if he feels like...

                    Comment

                    • SUBZER0ED
                      Be water, my friend.
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2013
                      • 11012
                      • 2,374
                      • 1,764
                      • 34,667

                      #390
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                      Golovkin just BURNED the rematch

                      GTFOH

                      you clowns could not keep it real if your ass was on fire

                      explain this.....
                      Man, you simply must stop drinking the Canelo Kool-Aid!

                      And those "points" that you so painstakingly put together, have exactly nothing to do with the discussion of Golovkin vs Canelo II.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP