Why is the WBC wrong for enforcing a mandatory on GGG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _Rexy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2018
    • 27929
    • 6,140
    • 3,585
    • 358,040

    #81
    I’m sure this has been said already, but nobody has an issue with GGG fightibg Charlo. The issue is that the IBF mandatory is the next one in line if there is no unification bout (BJS or Canelo) which is fine, and was fine until last week when Mauricio came out and suddenly said that the WBC was next.

    Also I’m sure people look at Adonis and some other champs and think “when we’re they forced to fight a mandatory?”

    Comment

    • BattlingNelson
      Mod a Phukka
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 29881
      • 3,255
      • 3,200
      • 286,536

      #82
      Originally posted by _Rexy_
      I’m sure this has been said already, but nobody has an issue with GGG fightibg Charlo. The issue is that the IBF mandatory is the next one in line if there is no unification bout (BJS or Canelo) which is fine, and was fine until last week when Mauricio came out and suddenly said that the WBC was next.

      Also I’m sure people look at Adonis and some other champs and think “when we’re they forced to fight a mandatory?”
      Of course WBC did that. They will do anything to please Canelo and steer him into the WBC belt. WBC are biased and corrupt AF.

      Comment

      • rickJen
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2017
        • 8764
        • 822
        • 112
        • 118,371

        #83
        Who actually says it's wrong?
        Last time I checked, you people were the ones complaining about GGG taking his mandatory fights.
        Why are you people changing tunes now?

        Comment

        • _Rexy_
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2018
          • 27929
          • 6,140
          • 3,585
          • 358,040

          #84
          Originally posted by genrick
          Who actually says it's wrong?
          Last time I checked, you people were the ones complaining about GGG taking his mandatory fights.
          Why are you people changing tunes now?
          because you can only fight one mandatory at a time.

          Comment

          • 285Kid
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2012
            • 7102
            • 91
            • 0
            • 14,777

            #85
            Dillian Whyte

            Comment

            • Idunnoshet
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2016
              • 4257
              • 619
              • 398
              • 54,836

              #86
              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              Of course WBC did that. They will do anything to please Canelo and steer him into the WBC belt. WBC are biased and corrupt AF.
              Only the WBC ???

              Comment

              • Gigantes
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2014
                • 3422
                • 117
                • 257
                • 27,739

                #87
                Originally posted by larryxxx..
                There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?
                why you asking new stuff when you still haven't done this?

                Originally posted by larryxxx..
                Well that $50 million was confirmed....
                Originally posted by Gigantes
                where's the link
                Originally posted by larryxxx..
                It was literally posted on this site
                Originally posted by Gigantes
                So where is it?

                Saw a lot of he said she said, where's the actual evidence that it's true

                If it was "literally posted on this site" then it should be easy for you to provide.

                Why not just provide it rather than waste time and say "it was literally posted on this site"
                still waiting????

                Comment

                • j0zef
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 8440
                  • 645
                  • 767
                  • 45,501

                  #88
                  Originally posted by Phenom
                  GGG can only fight one guy at a time and the IBF ordered a mandatory

                  IBF and WBC need to work this out
                  End thread.

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
                    Thanks for the clarification, man.
                    Not a problem. Happy to help.


                    I don't suppose Mauricio dropped any hints on how they're likely to approach the situation with the IBF? Do the WBC still consider themselves to have precedence or are they likely to come to an agreement to let the IBF mando situation be resolved first given that their hearing has already taken place?
                    Yes, the WBC feels it is their turn and they do not want to get skipped. GGG taking that Vanes fight really screwed things up with the IBF. For a three belt world champion, especially if those three belts are WBC/WBA/IBF (those three orgs work better together than they do with the WBO), typically the orgs will let you rotate every fight between voluntary and mandatory, so out of every six fights, you've fought three voluntaries, one WBC mandatory, one WBA mandatory and one IBF mandatory.

                    By fighting Vanes, that was two voluntaries in a row, so the whole system is messed up now.

                    Comment

                    • _Rexy_
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2018
                      • 27929
                      • 6,140
                      • 3,585
                      • 358,040

                      #90
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                      Not a problem. Happy to help.




                      Yes, the WBC feels it is their turn and they do not want to get skipped. GGG taking that Vanes fight really screwed things up with the IBF. For a three belt world champion, especially if those three belts are WBC/WBA/IBF (those three orgs work better together than they do with the WBO), typically the orgs will let you rotate every fight between voluntary and mandatory, so out of every six fights, you've fought three voluntaries, one WBC mandatory, one WBA mandatory and one IBF mandatory.

                      By fighting Vanes, that was two voluntaries in a row, so the whole system is messed up now.
                      out of curiosity, why were the bodies okay with the Canelo rematch? Are there special rematch exemptions in the voluntary/mandatory system?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP