Why is the WBC wrong for enforcing a mandatory on GGG?

[Boxing Goat]

Because they're a Mexican organization and play favorites to Mexicans.

[_Rexy_]

They weren't opposed to the Vanes fight. Got them a sanctioning fee on short notice instead of there being no fight at all and therefore no fee.

When you say they were quiet, what exactly was the WBC supposed to say?

Well, had they not sanctioned it like the IBF, they’d appear less hypocritical IMO.

[!! Shawn]

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?

Considering that GGG was Sergio Martinez's mandatory, and he chose to fight Cotto instead.

Given that GGG was Cotto's mandatory, and he chose to fight Canelo instead.

Given that GGG was Canelo's mandatory, and he chose to vacate the belt instead.

The WBC never enforced Canelo's mandatory obligations.

I don't think anyone has a problem with him fighting Charlo. That would be a good fight.

[Illmatic94]

GGG has pressure from all side. but thats his own doing. nobody told him to waste his time with a worthless Vanes fight. he could've gotten the IBF mando out the way but chose to play ******.

[4truth]

As I understand it, there's no real problem. If not Canelo then unification with Saunders. If neither is available or willing then Charlo is as good as any.

[N/A]

Well, had they not sanctioned it like the IBF, they’d appear less hypocritical IMO.

Vanes was ranked #1 at 154 in the WBC, so refuse to approve him for a voluntary defense at 160 would have been tough to justify.

Vanes wasn't ranked by the IBF in any division, which made it tougher for them to approve him as an opponent.

[Hnnnggg]

Stevenson hasn’t fought a mandatory in something like 5 years and he still holds his wbc belt. It’s acceptable that they enforce a mandatory defense but the manner in which they’re going about it is so blatantly biased.

[Boxing Goat]

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?

Because they are using it to strong arm GGG into fighting Canelo on his terms when he was the reason that the fight got delayed. Let's not forget that Charlo was n/a at the time the May fight happened, therefore missing a title shot opportunity.

[Hnnnggg]

...typical TripleCUCKs defend their glazed cock no matter what.

Perhaps this trash shouldn't have fought a homeless person on a 2 week camp after 2 year layoff and a career in JMW coming off a loss.

"End thread."

You’re right, he should’ve pulled out of his scheduled fight; then get suspended for ped abuse. Calling people cucks when your profile name extols a drug cheat who waited 2 years for ggg to get older just shows you’re a massive canelo ****sucker.

[Boxing Goat]

GGG has pressure from all side. but thats his own doing. nobody told him to waste his time with a worthless Vanes fight. he could've gotten the IBF mando out the way but chose to play ******.

To face a guy like Derevyanchenko on 3 weeks preparation for very short money would have been ****** on GGG's part. Blame Canelo, not GGG.