Originally posted by hitking
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Promoter: Canelo Wants 65-35, We Want Fair 50-50 Split!
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postneither hurt the other but 1 was more aggressive and landed more. Are you Mexican?
You obviously don’t know how to score a fight. You score based on clean punching. Canelo has the edge. Effective aggression. GGG was the aggressor, but how effective was it. Ring generalship. In the rounds that were relatively even, I gave GGG the edge because at times the pace of the fight seemed to be getting to Canelo at times. And the forth and most forgotten criteria is defense. Canelo was clearly the better defender in the ring. All that adds up to a very even fight. I favored Canelo. I don’t have a problem with a draw. I don’t have a problem with someone having GGG winning close. I do have a problem with the notion that GGG dominated or even clearly or decisively beat Canelo, because it just didn’t happen.
And no, I’m not Mexican nor a Canelo fan. I’m a seasoned fight fan. I thought Trout deserved the decision against Canelo. I thought Lara clearly beat Canelo. There’s no biased over here. GGG wasn’t a good that night as a lot of you pretend he was. Look at his face post fight. He also took a lot of punishment the body.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostCanelo landed more power shots, at a higher connect percentage. GGG won the jabbing contest. Canelo landed more power shots in seven of twelve rounds. I don’t care how aggressive you are. I favor the guy landing the cleaner shots.
You obviously don’t know how to score a fight. You score based on clean punching. Canelo has the edge. Effective aggression. GGG was the aggressor, but how effective was it. Ring generalship. In the rounds that were relatively even, I gave GGG the edge because at times the pace of the fight seemed to be getting to Canelo at times. And the forth and most forgotten criteria is defense. Canelo was clearly the better defender in the ring. All that adds up to a very even fight. I favored Canelo. I don’t have a problem with a draw. I don’t have a problem with someone having GGG winning close. I do have a problem with the notion that GGG dominated or even clearly or decisively beat Canelo, because it just didn’t happen.
And no, I’m not Mexican nor a Canelo fan. I’m a seasoned fight fan. I thought Trout deserved the decision against Canelo. I thought Lara clearly beat Canelo. There’s no biased over here. GGG wasn’t a good that night as a lot of you pretend he was. Look at his face post fight. He also took a lot of punishment the body.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostIf anything, that just makes the fight bigger! Canelo did that, not ggg. So canelo should ask for more! What, did ggg beating Vanes make this rematch bigger? Hell no! Dumb b.itch
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postno need to write a novel. If you knew so much about boxing, you'd know that power punches don't really mean they landed with power. Canelo fought passively & tried to steal rounds by only fighting 30-45 seconds per round. You talk about not knowing how to score fights but maybe you should Google the press row scores for that fight. You're in the vast minority in thinking Canelo won. You clearly don't know as much about boxing as you think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by omh View PostMayweather and tyson's biggest paydays were after scandal.canelo didn't loose any endorsements the fight got more interest and tickets started selling faster after the +result.lomanchenko never rematched salido and he's doing fine.Canelo has enough fans and haters that will pay to see him win or lose the same haters that root and claim to be fans of ggg but are unwilling to pay for him against someone not named canelo.
I am not saying Canelo will not be a top draw in boxing but his trajectory is not on the way up. Golovkin is not and will never be a guy who can do half a million PPVs on his own. He is always going to need a good dance partner to even bring in 100K. I am not sure Canelo can get away though with what he did in the past. Golovkin is his biggest fight. If it does not happen it will hurt his sales even more I believe.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostThose scandals weren't similar to Canelo's they were unrelated to the ring. Lomachenko and Salido have nothing to do with Canelo and PEDs.
I am not saying Canelo will not be a top draw in boxing but his trajectory is not on the way up. Golovkin is not and will never be a guy who can do half a million PPVs on his own. He is always going to need a good dance partner to even bring in 100K. I am not sure Canelo can get away though with what he did in the past. Golovkin is his biggest fight. If it does not happen it will hurt his sales even more I believe.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostBut again, your only rebuttal is that GGG was the aggressor. Or that more people thought GGG won. Most people favor aggression. Regardless of whether it’s effective or not. And most people frown on a guy fighting going backwards, even if he’s being more effective. And that’s because most people don’t know **** about boxing, you’re a prime example.
Comment
-
Comment