He is right. Canelo messed up now he have to pay
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Promoter: Canelo Wants 65-35, We Want Fair 50-50 Split!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostSure. Make him pay a little more. But 50/50 would be insane. Seems pretty obvious GGG would settle for 60/40.
I agree though that 50-50 is a non starter. But you have to begin somewhere.
I would suspect that somewhere between 60-40 and 55-45 would get it done, with GGG agreeing to waive any possible damages over the May 5 cancellation.........
Comment
-
they had a deal
after the first fight, both parties agreed to A FAIR DEAL that was good enough to get the job done
but now..... suddenly Hypekin wants more money lol
imho, Golovkin knows that he will lose in September if he faces Canelo now..... so he will seek an easier path to break Hopkins record, just like he did with Vanes
I have never seen anything from Golovkin to suggest that he will not take the easy way out, AGAIN!!
and if that happens, I will firmly believe that decision was made immediately following/or just prior to - the Vanes fight6..... when every single member of Team Bullshht started name-dropping Murata
$notaboutdatlife
Comment
-
Really!
So Gennady has four belts made concessions for the last fight and has tested clean his whole career. And Oscar wants that kind of split? Regardless of who your pulling for the demands Canelo is asking for is beyond reasonable. In fact, it's a bull**** ploy to make the other fighter look scared and doesn't want to fight. Canelo is full of shot and that offer defies common sense not matter who you pulling for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by otsm702 View PostSo Gennady has four belts made concessions for the last fight and has tested clean his whole career. And Oscar wants that kind of split? Regardless of who your pulling for the demands Canelo is asking for is beyond reasonable. In fact, it's a bull**** ploy to make the other fighter look scared and doesn't want to fight. Canelo is full of shot and that offer defies common sense not matter who you pulling for.
Brick Top:
If I throw a dog a bone, I don't want to know if it tastes good or not. And if you ever interrupt me whilst I'm walking, I'll cut your f***ing jacobs off.
Comment
-
Canelo probably doesn't want the Golovkin fight now ... seeing he can't get "BIG" on his "Mexican Meat" this time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SteveM View PostWhere are your comprehension skills? I didn't say that. I said if he fights 3 fights he can make the same as 1 golovkin fight but at minimal risk.
I can only say what I have seen in decades of following boxinrg. Namely errors, transgressions and even a few losses are all fogotten if a fighter can come back and string a line of convincing wins together.
I'm not saying Canelo's reputation is teflon coated but he is still young - he can have a dip for 18 months and then come back stronger than ever - but in the end we need evidence in the form of his ppv sales dipping or maintaining - we dont have that info yet.
Of course this is all subjective. I clearly believe Canelo has been diminished. The only way to redeem himself is by beating named opponents. The biggest name out there and most significant is Golovkin. If he does not face him he is going to always live with the legacy of the fight and aftermath with Golovkin. The hardcore Mexican fanbase is going to remember that. Canelo's crossover star beyond the Mexican market is gone IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostYes my bad. Of course you are forgetting cost which is the time span those three fights take vs. one fight.
Of course this is all subjective. I clearly believe Canelo has been diminished. The only way to redeem himself is by beating named opponents. The biggest name out there and most significant is Golovkin. If he does not face him he is going to always live with the legacy of the fight and aftermath with Golovkin. The hardcore Mexican fanbase is going to remember that. Canelo's crossover star beyond the Mexican market is gone IMO.
Comment
Comment