Comments Thread For: Loeffler Ecstatic With Golovkin's Ratings, Matching Hopkins Record

[Street15]

you made yet another weak-knee'd, lame, excuse..... and I called you out on it

if you disagree, then why did you post this rubbish.....





go on, tell us what point you were trying to make

Do you see those question marks? Those indicate questions. A question was being asked. You understand? (By the way, that was a question as well)

[aboutfkntime]

GGG hasn't ducked Dervyancheko doe.

But I promise you this ... if the IBF created a new rule saying that because GGG has defended their title more than 5 times he has been promoted to the status of super IBF MW champion, so he doesn't have to fight Dervyanchenko, and Derevyanchenko can now fight Andrade for the "regular" IBF title, then I personally would no longer recognise GGG as the legitimate IBF champ. For me, that would be the winner of Derevyanchenko vs Andrade.

yes he did lol

they were ordered to fight him..... but right now Team Bullshht are fcuking around with lawyers, trying to get out of it

just like you accuse Sturm of doing looooool

oh how the mighty (mouthy) have fallen

[GGG Gloveking]

yes he did lol

they were ordered to fight him..... but right now Team Bullshht are fcuking around with lawyers, trying to get out of it

just like you accuse Sturm of doing looooool

oh how the mighty (mouthy) have fallen

Another GGG thread...more of your same whining.

Do you ever contribute anything positive to this website?

[aboutfkntime]

Do you see those question marks? Those indicate questions. A question was being asked. You understand? (By the way, that was a question as well)

I asked you a question, what point were you trying to make with that post?

a simple question.... to the guy who recently decided that it was appropriate to clarify what a question is lol

what point were you trying to make with that post ?

[aboutfkntime]

Another GGG thread...more of your same whining.

Do you ever contribute anything positive to this website?

pointing out that Hypekin is not really about to break Hopkins record IS positive, son

the fact you are not aware of that, is highly amusing

what, you think any ol hypejob should be allowed to tip-toe through the tulips for his ENTIRE CAREER, and then retire with a bunch of roses without achieving anything meaningful?

e.g.

1) Golovkin was not the REAL WBA champ during most of his ****ty "defences"

2) most of those guys were fkn scrubs, so who cares anyway ?

[GGG Gloveking]

pointing out that Hypekin is not really about to break Hopkins record IS positive, son

the fact you are not aware of that, is highly amusing

what, you think any ol hypejob should be allowed to tip-toe through the tulips for his ENTIRE CAREER, and then retire with a bunch of roses without achieving anything meaningful?

e.g.

1) Golovkin was not the REAL WBA champ during most of his ****ty "defences"

2) most of those guys were fkn scrubs, so who cares anyway ?

Do you understand the difference between positivity and negativity?

Let me ask again, do you ever contribute anything positive to this website?

[aboutfkntime]

Do you understand the difference between positivity and negativity?

Let me ask again, do you ever contribute anything positive to this website?

pointing out that Golovkin is a fake, and that you are a muppet..... IS positive

it is positively funny, and others appreciate my contribution

but because you do not appreciate my contribution, I am happy to keep quiet, and never mention Golovkin again

OK ?

I will start now.....













































































LOOOOOOOOOOL

nah, just kidding ahahah

[GGG Gloveking]

Someone needs to read a couple word definitions

[kafkod]

Another GGG thread...more of your same whining.

Do you ever contribute anything positive to this website?

He does, occasionally. But most of the time he's too busy whining about GGG to contribute anything.

[Street15]

I asked you a question, what point were you trying to make with that post?

a simple question.... to the guy who recently decided that it was appropriate to clarify what a question is lol

what point were you trying to make with that post ?

Point? It was a question. Hence the question mark. I was asking if that's what the other gentleman was talking about. He never responded. So I don't know what he was referring to.

You jumped in and started reaching for straws and bringing up things that no one was talkin about and answering your own questions. For a second, I had to scroll back up and see exactly what you were answering and if any question asked had anything to do with your tangent. And to no avail - I couldn't find what your answers was responding to.