Comments Thread For: Loeffler Ecstatic With Golovkin's Ratings, Matching Hopkins Record

[kafkod]

Simply put .. Hopkins never defended a minor title which people only count for certain fighters he held the super titles meaning he was the top guy in each organization with whom he held a title those titles he defended 20 times w/o a loss

Ggg held minor title which only count now because ofcourse its ggg lol. But none the less he is counting defenses as if he was a full champion for which the bhop record was for in the first place ggg has held and defended as full champion now 8 or 9 times.

BHop only held one super title, which was the WBA. And he became the WBA super champion by winning the regular WBA title from Felix Trinidad.

The WBA can change a regular title into a super title whenever they feel like it, by simply altering their own rules, and they can create a new super title out of nothing in exactly the same way.

And when a WBA regular champion gets promoted to super champion, all his WBA title defences are counted as one continous reign, which is what happened in the case of GGG

[kafkod]

I will debate every single one with you..... and with anyone else who wants to join in..... anytime

I actually will take on anyone from 154-168..... and the fatties

Debate it with yourself. You enjoy doing that. I'll come back tomorrow and see who won.

[Robbie Barrett]

BHop only held one super title, which was the WBA. And he became the WBA super champion by winning the regular WBA title from Felix Trinidad.

The WBA can change a regular title into a super title whenever they feel like it, by simply altering their own rules, and they can create a new super title out of nothing in exactly the same way.

And when a WBA regular champion gets promoted to super champion, all his WBA title defences are counted as one continous reign, which is what happened in the case of GGG

You can try and twist it all you want. The fact is Golovkin wasn't the viewed as the top champion, Sturm was. Which means those regular defences don't mean **** in a true boxing fans eyes.

[aboutfkntime]

Wait what? Are you referring to Sturm crossing mountains and requesting to be named SUPER WBA champ right when GGG won interim and he would be obligated to face GGG?

https://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin...r-champ--31871

I hope you weren't talking about that.

if the WBA are so ****ty, and corrupt..... then why are you trying to justify that Golovkin should be given credit for defending a lesser version of ****?

btw, the WBA rankings were Sturm > Geale > Golovkin

so..... not only is your excuse extremely weak, it is incomplete

you are literally admitting that Golovkin's defences are not legitimate..... but are trying to justify those defences in two ways..... firstly, by insinuating that Sturm ducked Golovkin....

EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THE FK THAT WORKS MAN.....

CONSIDERING THE FACT THAT GOLOVKIN JUST DUCKED HIS MANDO DEREVYANCHENKO..... HOW COME STURM'S SUPPOSED DUCKING OF GOLOVKIN AUTOMATICALLY INSTALLS GOLOVKIN AS CHAMP (JUMPING AHEAD OF GEALE, WTF?????)..... AND YET GOLOVKIN'S DUCKING OF DEREVYANCHENKO COUNTS AS A LEGITIMATE DEFENCE???

have a real good think about that and get back to me lol

..... and secondly, you are insisting that should Sturm have fought Golovkin, Golovkin would DEFINITELY have beaten him..... dude, that is just your opinion, an opinion that is NOWHERE NEAR A GOOD ENOUGH REASON TO HAPPILY HAND GOLOVKIN A TITLE..... ARE YOU FKN SERIOUS?????

you LITERALLY want to award Golovkin a happyness title lol

GTFOH..... that is not how this game works

and what about Geale ?????

how come your happyness award allowed Golovkin to not only become a champion based on TWO silly opinions.....

1.) that Sturm ducked, which is opinion and irrelevant anyway, because boxing does not hand out happyness awards lol)..... 2.) that Golovkin DEFINITELY would have won lol, which is just opinion, and Sturm beating Golovkin would not be the biggest upset in boxing history, which does not matter anyway because, boxing does not hand out happyness awards)..... but then your happyness award also allowed Golovkin to miraculously jump ahead of Geale??

you are trying to award Golovkin with a participation certificate looool

FACT: he was not the real WBA champ
FACT: the reasons why simply do not matter..... it either happened, or it did not..... opinions and dreams/wishes/hopes will not change history

[aboutfkntime]

BHop only held one super title, which was the WBA. And he became the WBA super champion by winning the regular WBA title from Felix Trinidad.

The WBA can change a regular title into a super title whenever they feel like it, by simply altering their own rules, and they can create a new super title out of nothing in exactly the same way.

And when a WBA regular champion gets promoted to super champion, all his WBA title defences are counted as one continous reign, which is what happened in the case of GGG

what a weak, shamefully-lame, BULL****, reason to award somebody a participation certificate loooool

when lil'G made those " defences ", he was the WBA #2 contender, and you know it..... so will I include all of Hopkins wins when he was rated as high as #3 by any particular sanctioning organisation..... like you just did with Golovkin????



you clowns are inventing new ways to be lame

[aboutfkntime]

You can try and twist it all you want. The fact is Golovkin wasn't the viewed as the top champion, Sturm was. Which means those regular defences don't mean **** in a true boxing fans eyes.

he wasn't even #2, Geale was

these ass-hats are trying to make Golovkin a champion by.....

1) insisting that Sturm ducked him

well, so fkn what lol..... Golovkin just ducked Derevyanchenko so that he could fight a no-hoper to tie that very same record loooool

2) insisting that Golovkin would have beaten Sturm

maybe, but..... what, we hand out world-titles by guessing now?

how ridiculous

that would not be the biggest upset in boxing history

3) miraculously promoting him ahead of Geale, because they lke Gennady more

fkn muppets lol

[aboutfkntime]

like I said on the other thread.....

if the WBC copied the WBA 3-champion ***wittery

Charlo vs Centeno/Heiland would both have been sanctioned as title defences.....

anyone with even the slightest clue, and even the slightest bit of integrity..... could not possibly accept that rubbish

luckily for the the golov-muppets, they have neither

[kafkod]

You can try and twist it all you want. The fact is Golovkin wasn't the viewed as the top champion, Sturm was. Which means those regular defences don't mean **** in a true boxing fans eyes.

You're not qualified to talk about how real boxing fans view anything. You're just a troll.

[Robbie Barrett]

You're not qualified to talk about how real boxing fans view anything. You're just a troll.

Ouch man, the Golovkin **** gobbler called me a troll, that really hurts.

[kafkod]

he wasn't even #2, Geale was

Oh no he wasn't!