GGG~vs~Hopkins; Who's Run at 160 More Impressive?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
-
historians do
they know that Golovkin's " record " is fake..... you already hear writers allude to it
Rold, Donovan, have both mentioned that Golovkin's defences were not for the real WBA title
casual fans are ****-house muppets for supporting that rubbishComment
-
hopkins. he's just a better fighter. only things golovkin does better is jab and punch.
felix trinidad would beat canelo's ass. probably golovkin's too.Comment
-
I voted Hopkins and I never liked him in his heyday. I found him boring and dirty. However, his win over Tito Trinidad shits everything Golovkin has done so far, all combined.Comment
-
Comment
-
I certainly dont decide, well said! - so its a crying shame for your post that the governing bodies DO get to decide it and not you.
And they have gone on record as not recognising the IBO.
Shame you have to ignore what the governing bodies of boxing tell you in order to advance your case.
But I hope GGG reahes double figures and displaces Sturm soon.Last edited by DreamFighter; 05-02-2018, 05:07 PM.Comment
-
Just imagine If he beats Vanes, 21 successful world title defenses, it would be making history.Comment
-
Link me to that post.well, you just gave us all one
so..... first you ran around saying that Jacobs could beat Trinidad
but then, I find a post from you stating that Jacobs is chinny..... and how you find talk of Jacobs being Golovkin's best win..... "baffling"
" baffling " was the word you used..... right ?
[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/CoDp6NnSmItoY/200.gif[/IMG]Comment
Comment