GGG~vs~Hopkins; Who's Run at 160 More Impressive?

[DreamFighter]

Hopkins fought a bunch of old no-names and blown-up welterweights. GGG's competition isn't the greatest but it's better than Hopkins'.

Anyone claiming Hopkins' opponents are better can only be going by a P4P test, which is ridiculous. That's like saying if only GGG had fought Chocolatito instead of having him on the undercard, he'd have a P4P win. Jacobs and Canelo beat anyone on Hopkins' list at the time he fought them.

jacobs has done nothing to warrant such a claim, dont be ridiculous.

Complaining about a couple of welterweights on hopkins resume is rich seeing as you use a light middle weight to counter the argument, and kell brook is one of 3Gs best wins.

[TonyGe]

Fighters who put Tito on the canvas.
Yory Boy Campas, Oba Carr, Anthony Stephens, Fernando Vargas, Kevin Lueshing, Alberto Cortes, David Reid, Bernard Hopkins Roy Jones.

[buge]

you mean who beats Jacobs.

plenty would - Echols, Taylor, Trinidad, Holmes, Johnson. There are others.

Jacobs is a good cotender, nothing more, yet.

LOL

* Echols is not on Jacobs' level ... he fought Eric Crumble early to pad his record, then he turned into Eric Crumble
* Taylor doesn't count (2 wins over Hopkins)
* Trinidad is a good name, but he was an undersized cheater with a glass chin ... note I didn't ask who lined up with Brook
* who the **** has Keith Holmes ever beaten, what's his best win to equate to wins over Quillin, Mora, Truax? Holmes has one win over a guy with a decent record, although that guy had the ultimate padded record and would lose to Sulecki.
* Johnson is a solid fighter, but he's gatekeeper level, and a can crusher

[aboutfkntime]

So your saying a guy that Hopkins thoroughly outboxed and stopped was his best opponent? So I guess your saying that Trinidad was better than Roy Jones because that's what it sounds like. If Trinidad according to you is better than Jones shouldn't have Hopkins beat Jones. Or are you using the Triangle theory here.

Hopkins did not beat Jones

[buge]

Hopkins did not beat Jones

old Hopkins beat old Jones

[aboutfkntime]

Ok tell me that Trinidad had a great chin. I need a good laugh..

well, you just gave us all one

so..... first you ran around saying that Jacobs could beat Trinidad

but then, I find a post from you stating that Jacobs is chinny..... and how you find talk of Jacobs being Golovkin's best win..... "baffling"

" baffling " was the word you used..... right ?


[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/CoDp6NnSmItoY/200.gif[/IMG]

[aboutfkntime]

Hopkins fought a bunch of old no-names and blown-up welterweights. GGG's competition isn't the greatest but it's better than Hopkins'.

Anyone claiming Hopkins' opponents are better can only be going by a P4P test, which is ridiculous. That's like saying if only GGG had fought Chocolatito instead of having him on the undercard, he'd have a P4P win. Jacobs and Canelo beat anyone on Hopkins' list at the time he fought them.

who did Golovkin beat that was better than Trinidad ?

this will be funny

[aboutfkntime]

jacobs has done nothing to warrant such a claim, dont be ridiculous.

Complaining about a couple of welterweights on hopkins resume is rich seeing as you use a light middle weight to counter the argument, and kell brook is one of 3Gs best wins.

exactly !

this thread is just ****** lol

[Skip Bayless]

Bhop 160 resume looks on par with ggg. Best wins are smaller guys moving up.

[aboutfkntime]

old Hopkins beat old Jones

not at 160