GGG~vs~Hopkins; Who's Run at 160 More Impressive?

[Lester Tutor]

Harold LEderman whispered into my ear that Tito Trinidad was a ****** version of Kell Brook. I said ''all hellllz nahh?!''

[Michael1437]

Hopkins by A LOT

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Man when you compare “middleweight resume” I think there very similar... hopkins has better names but the best 2 were welterweights... I still think Hopkins edges him.... when ppl compare the 2 I think a lot ppl look at Hopkins career rather than the middleweight run....... if you wanna compare careers it’s not even close, they probably shouldn’t be mentioned in the same sentence

I have similiar rationale myself, I voted Hopkins but I think it’s pretty close. A decisive win over Canelo would make it even closer

[Michael1437]

To me, beating Trindad and DLH were huge, sure DLH got a gift against Strum, but in the manner in which he won, was way more impressive than anything on GGG resume.

[4truth]

Golovkin does not have a win of that caliber at 160.... that is what lol

Hopkins best win is Trinidad..... Golovkin's best win is Jacobs

not even close..... and yet another silly golov-discussion

I'm done with this, I'll just have to live with this disagreement.
Plus I'm sick of looking at your signature GIF making sport of a ******ed kid. Kinda makes me think you're a bit of a jerk.

[TonyGe]

your " supposed " opinion..... is irrelevant

sorry, but not convinced at all that you thought that

FACT: Tito was a huge favorite following his KO of Joppy..... and Hopkins knocking him out is a much bigger scalp than Golovkin scraping past Danny Jacobs..... who nobody gave a chance

No I'm not talking about Gennady in my post or trying to build him up. I'm talking about two Middleweights who got into the ring in days past. The favorite was in this particular fight was in over his head. Whether I'm a fan of Golovkin is irrelevant. Whether Tito was better or worse than some of Golovkin's opponents is irrelevant. As it turned out I was correct in my assesment of the fight.

[aboutfkntime]

I'm done with this, I'll just have to live with this disagreement.
Plus I'm sick of looking at your signature GIF making sport of a ******ed kid. Kinda makes me think you're a bit of a jerk.

that..... could be true

Jacobs > Trinidad..... is not true

see the diff ?

[aboutfkntime]

No I'm not talking about Gennady in my post or trying to build him up. I'm talking about two Middleweights who got into the ring in days past. The favorite was in this particular fight was in over his head. Whether I'm a fan of Golovkin is irrelevant. Whether Tito was better or worse than some of Golovkin's opponents is irrelevant. As it turned out I was correct in my assesment of the fight.

NO

this discussion is about, who has a better resume at 160..... so, that is the ONLY relevant subject

Hopkins best win is Trinidad.... and Golovkin's best win is Jacobs

Hopkins knocking out Trinidad, is a much bigger scalp than Golovkin scraping past Danny Jacobs..... who nobody gave a chance

Trinidad > Jacobs..... so, Hopkins > Golovkin

[TonyGe]

that..... could be true

Jacobs > Trinidad..... is not true

see the diff ?

OK now I get it. In the first part of your rebuttal 4truth was correct.
In the second part you proved how clueless you are.

[aboutfkntime]

OK now I get it. In the first part of your rebuttal 4truth was correct.
In the second part you proved how clueless you are.

I am not the muppet who is suggesting that Jacobs > Trinidad