GGG~vs~Hopkins; Who's Run at 160 More Impressive?

[filup79]

I would say Hopkins, GGG had been defending a secondary belt for years. Keep in mind that GGG has only beat one champ for a title in Lemieux for the IBF. Both the WBA and WBC were handed to him after being elevated to champ.

[TonyGe]

Micheal Montero? did a piece on this and their stats are darned near identical.

[aboutfkntime]

Trinidad was never a formidable middleweight. Lost 1/2 his fights at Middleweight. May well will turn out someday that Brook is a better Middleweight.

FACT: Trinidad was a HUGE favorite, and undefeated
FACT: Hopkins knocked him out

Trinidad knocked out middleweights before/after fighting Hopkins

before he sc****d past Jacobs, Golovkin's best win was Lemieux

[aboutfkntime]

Micheal Montero? did a piece on this and their stats are darned near identical.

stats ?

ummm.... names, is what counts..... nothing else

it is not even close, you guys are dreaming

[TonyGe]

FACT: Trinidad was a HUGE favorite, and undefeated
FACT: Hopkins knocked him out

Trinidad knocked out middleweights before/after fighting Hopkins

before he sc****d past Jacobs, Golovkin's best win was Lemieux

I remember that fight clearly. When it was announced and people were touting Trinidad I couldn't believe it. Tito was too small for Hopkins. I'm not taking anything away from Hopkins or Tito but at Middleweight against Hopkins he was in over his head physically and skill wise.

[4truth]

FACT: Trinidad was a HUGE favorite, and undefeated
FACT: Hopkins knocked him out

Trinidad knocked out middleweights before/after fighting Hopkins

before he sc****d past Jacobs, Golovkin's best win was Lemieux

He was a huge favorite, so what? The FACT is Trinidad was, when all was said and done, a mediocre middleweight.

[TonyGe]

Trinidad was never a formidable middleweight. Lost 1/2 his fights at Middleweight. May well will turn out someday that Brook is a better Middleweight.

I posted this before but I will again. When the fight was announced and people were rating Trinidad over Hookins I was in disbelief. Tito was a very good fighter but wasn't on Bernards level skillwise or physically.

[aboutfkntime]

He was a huge favorite, so what? The FACT is Trinidad was, when all was said and done, a mediocre middleweight.

Golovkin does not have a win of that caliber at 160.... that is what lol

Hopkins best win is Trinidad..... Golovkin's best win is Jacobs

not even close..... and yet another silly golov-discussion

[aboutfkntime]

I posted this before but I will again. When the fight was announced and people were rating Trinidad over Hookins I was in disbelief. Tito was a very good fighter but wasn't on Bernards level skillwise or physically.

your " supposed " opinion..... is irrelevant

sorry, but not convinced at all that you thought that

FACT: Tito was a huge favorite following his KO of Joppy..... and Hopkins knocking him out is a much bigger scalp than Golovkin scraping past Danny Jacobs..... who nobody gave a chance

[aboutfkntime]

the comparison is Trinidad vs Jacobs

stop bashing Tito you muppets, and tell me how the fk Jacobs is better lol