Comments Thread For: GGG: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!

[kafkod]

He was 40 years old. 36 year old Hopkins beats the brakes off of 36 year old GGG like he did Tito and Echols. You match them up at any same age and Hopkins is the better fighter.

I think it would end in a technical decision after a classic BHop swallow dive through the ropes into the first row!

[Mr. 29K]

****** drunk Russian. This dude is a joke just like all his 97k fans

[DreamFighter]

You mean the Taylor who went on to go life and death and barely beat Ouma and Spinks(split decision) and then lost twice to Pavlik to Froch and Abraham while Taylor was IN HIS PRIME.
The two losses to Taylor and the draw to Mercado somehow mean nothing to the bhop lovers lol

40 year old man. why type such stuff when you know it destroys itself?

[Shadoww702]

It was a mandatory defence, you fukking idiot.

There's different perspectives and there's plain lies.

Here's the truth:

It's literally impossible for a champion to financially kill a mandatory defence.

Canelo got the fight made by agreeing to give GGG more time to prepare and a bigger cut than he was entitled to.

If you say I'm lying about either of those points, then provide links to prove it or go find another GGG thread to post your own lies in, because I'm smoking you out of this one.

Fixed it for you.

[aboutfkntime]

could Golovkin have beaten the Taylor who beat Hopkins ?

You mean the Taylor who went on to go life and death and barely beat Ouma and Spinks(split decision) and then lost twice to Pavlik to Froch and Abraham while Taylor was IN HIS PRIME.
The two losses to Taylor and the draw to Mercado somehow mean nothing to the bhop lovers lol

no

I mean the Taylor who beat Hopkins

[aboutfkntime]

It was a mandatory defence, you fukking idiot.

There's different perspectives and there's plain lies.

Here's the truth:

It's literally impossible for a champion to financially kill a mandatory defence.

GGG got the fight made by agreeing to give Jacobs more time to prepare and a bigger cut than he was entitled to as a mandatory challenger.

If you say I'm lying about either of those points, then provide links to prove it or go find another GGG thread to post your own lies in, because I'm smoking you out of this one.

bullshht, if they stuck to 25% Jacobs would have pulled out, and they knew it

[kafkod]

Fixed it for you.

That's dumb, even by your standards.

[aboutfkntime]

That's dumb, even by your standards.

not worse than Dumbkin, saying his record is better than Hopkins

[Ake-Dawg]

You mean the Taylor who went on to go life and death and barely beat Ouma and Spinks(split decision) and then lost twice to Pavlik to Froch and Abraham while Taylor was IN HIS PRIME.
The two losses to Taylor and the draw to Mercado somehow mean nothing to the bhop lovers lol

No....the Taylor that beat Hopkins twice. This is the type of statement made by a person that doesn't watch the fights, but looks at random stats, fight results, twitter level commentary, and then poses as a knowledgeable fight fan on NSB but can't ever put any context around their statements.

Name one fighter that will go into the HOF that's on GGG's resume. Does GGG beat DLH at 156? Trinidad at 157?

[rrayvez]

No we all dont no GGG won. I know a lot of ppl who agree with the draw. I can easily give both 6 rounds.

Dont tell me your one of those rtards that gave GGG like 20 rounds???

Ok, so there are a few biased people who want to argue the other way but MOST who honestly scored the fight had GGG winning , including you right after the fight.