Comments Thread For: Jacobs Would Think Long and Hard' About Derevyanchenko Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scary_canary
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 1184
    • 28
    • 48
    • 18,374

    #11
    There is no way Jacobs goes for the ibf with there rehydration clause...

    Comment

    • BillyBoxing
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 7454
      • 488
      • 62
      • 50,228

      #12
      Jacobs would think "long and hard" about Derevyanchenko...

      OK...

      Comment

      • champion4ever
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 23918
        • 4,090
        • 7,167
        • 202,915,785

        #13
        Jacobs shouldn't pass up this opportunity. Chances are there's no guarantee that he'll ever see GGG in the ring again; Especially if he defeats Alvarez.

        Comment

        • Butch.McRae
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2015
          • 4187
          • 153
          • 80
          • 22,548

          #14
          Originally posted by Scary_canary
          There is no way Jacobs goes for the ibf with there rehydration clause...
          Interesting point

          Comment

          • Mammoth
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 35717
            • 3,848
            • 3,389
            • 378,304

            #15
            Originally posted by Scary_canary
            There is no way Jacobs goes for the ibf with there rehydration clause...
            Didn't the IBF drop that clause?

            Comment

            • 5burowz
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 2636
              • 128
              • 94
              • 15,497

              #16
              jacobs would lose to sd

              Comment

              • thereeldeel
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Oct 2013
                • 480
                • 81
                • 39
                • 13,980

                #17
                Originally posted by Mammoth
                Didn't the IBF drop that clause?


                http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_...d-title-fights

                Comment

                • landotter
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 4205
                  • 1,393
                  • 5,849
                  • 33,265

                  #18
                  So the IBF has a #1 contender, a #3 contender....but no #2?

                  So, the IBF is one of the better organizations, but still finds ways to be ******. Pretty impressive.

                  I love me some Jacobs, but he did not look really great for the second straight fight. He won it, but I thought he allowed himself to be hit a lot more than he would have a few years ago. If he gets this fight, I really need to spend some time watching some Derevyanchenko fights on You Tube. I may be giving him an edge.

                  Comment

                  • Scipio2009
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 13741
                    • 276
                    • 64
                    • 98,172

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Butch.McRae
                    Looks like Charlo will get a title shot one way or another here. But it's interesting, Jacobs has never won a title at MW (I don't count that regular nonsense). It would be hard to walk away from the opportunity, right?
                    Would it, though?

                    Jacobs is now mandated to fight for the WBA belt, after Derevyanchenko (IBF) and Charlo (WBC) get their shots [with Golovkin likely to vacate the IBF belt to get his Alvarez rematch, Jacobs is only behind Charlo].

                    Is blowing up your camp worth moving up your mandated title shot 8months to a year? (HBO being as tight with the money as they seem to be now would likely send Golovkin to the UK to fight Billy Joe Saunders, were he to try and stall things)

                    Golovkin won the interim WBA belt, was given the IBO and WBC belts, and was basically given a vacant IBF belt, and he's been cool with it.

                    How would fighting for a vacant belt, against his own camp member outshine fighting Golovkin (or Alvarez) for a full title?

                    Comment

                    • Scary_canary
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2016
                      • 1184
                      • 28
                      • 48
                      • 18,374

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mammoth
                      Didn't the IBF drop that clause?
                      Yea actually I think they might have,, I remember somethin a cpl months ago

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP