Comments Thread For: Golovkin vs. Derevyanchenko is Ordered By The IBF
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Bah! Derevianchenko is another easy fight, no experience, has fought no one, no fan base, does not bring money, people here talking sh.i.t that he is ducking that guy, who is not tested yet, heck no one here talked about Derevianchenko before the IBF issue, Golovkin should vacate the IBF belt, get the match against Clenelo, win that fight, then win back his IBF belt or fight BJS for his belt, either way he has good fights waiting for him, @ this stage and age he should take the most lucrative fights he can take, just like most boxers do on the way out, one of the best middleweights there has been, this is what happens when you are doing something good and are a successful @ it, people tend to criticize and talk SH.I.T about you, has happened to all the greats and it means you are on the right track, whats sad is that no one can beat GGG in the ring so the sanctioning bodies are trying to use tricks to strip him, they've done it before like with Hagler and Holmes by fixing their fights against Leonard and Spinks, it wont work this time because War Machine GGG is kicking A$$ and giving out receipts like a true champ. Keep on hating, GGG will keep lining them up and getting them out of the way with his fists. WAR GGG one of the greats!Last edited by Goyotronico; 04-28-2018, 09:02 AM.Comment
-
-
who cares, this is the problem with all these belts, too many mandatories. if push comes to shove charlo and dereveyenchenko can have the belts, they are meaningless at this stage in GGGs career. He'll fight two better fighters in saunders and canelo for a hell of a lot more money.Comment
-
who cares, this is the problem with all these belts, too many mandatories. if push comes to shove charlo and dereveyenchenko can have the belts, they are meaningless at this stage in GGGs career. He'll fight two better fighters in saunders and canelo for a hell of a lot more money.
The bold: Isn't GGG's whole career based on a hollow, meaningless title defenses? Isn't that what his fans mention when they talk about his non-existent legacy? Can't have it both ways.
He should just drop all the belts.Comment
-
I agree with you that belts are utterly meaningless and that he should fight whoever will pay him the most at this point in his career. Just be honest about it, that you are indeed a businessman.
The bold: Isn't GGG's whole career based on a hollow, meaningless title defenses? Isn't that what his fans mention when they talk about his non-existent legacy? Can't have it both ways.
He should just drop all the belts.Comment
-
I agree with you that belts are utterly meaningless and that he should fight whoever will pay him the most at this point in his career. Just be honest about it, that you are indeed a businessman.
The bold: Isn't GGG's whole career based on a hollow, meaningless title defenses? Isn't that what his fans mention when they talk about his non-existent legacy? Can't have it both ways.
He should just drop all the belts.Comment
-
people forgetting that clenelo will have been out of the ring for a year and might want a tune up?Comment
-
who cares, this is the problem with all these belts, too many mandatories. if push comes to shove charlo and dereveyenchenko can have the belts, they are meaningless at this stage in GGGs career. He'll fight two better fighters in saunders and canelo for a hell of a lot more money.
Is there anybody out there that could beat GGG? That's what I want to know.Comment
Comment