Originally posted by Mrbamladen
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn: How Did WBC Order Whyte-Ortiz, Wilder-Breazeale Next?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostIt makes a lot of sense and was already explained last year. Stiverne agreed to risk his mandatory position against Breazeale, just like Povetkin did against David Price on a recent matchroom show.
When Ortiz failed a test, resulting in Stiverne being moved to the main event, it meant Breazeale already had a signed deal for a final eliminator, but no opponent. The WBC allowed him to face the highest available contender so he wouldn't have his opportunity taken away through no fault of his own.
That is how Breazeale ended up in a final eliminator. Whyte could have had the fight if he wanted, but obviously didn't want the fight on such short notice. But that's the reason Whyte got skipped over for that final eliminator. Whyte was then offered the next final eliminator.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kezzer View PostHe already signed a contract to fight in July before this offer. But we will see what happens, all should come out in the next week I guess.
Really??? I've seen nothing of the kind. I just keep hearing Hearn say that. Could you provide a link please.
Comment
-
-
Umm cuz their corrupt? They were corrupt yesterday. They will be corrupt tomorrow. And you do the math that makes them corrupt today.
Hearn knows this. Idk why more mfers don't outright bring it up more often and hint at it more often.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostIt makes a lot of sense and was already explained last year. Stiverne agreed to risk his mandatory position against Breazeale, just like Povetkin did against David Price on a recent matchroom show.
When Ortiz failed a test, resulting in Stiverne being moved to the main event, it meant Breazeale already had a signed deal for a final eliminator, but no opponent. The WBC allowed him to face the highest available contender so he wouldn't have his opportunity taken away through no fault of his own.
That is how Breazeale ended up in a final eliminator. Whyte could have had the fight if he wanted, but obviously didn't want the fight on such short notice. But that's the reason Whyte got skipped over for that final eliminator. Whyte was then offered the next final eliminator.
Comment
-
Wilder against Breazeale, do your thing in a fight no one gives a damn about.
And what makes this clown think anybody gives a damn about Wilder fighting Dillian Shyte?
Shyte running scared shtless from Grandpa Ortiz.
He's 185 years old doe LOL
Scary ass mofo. Fight him! get stretched out like a limousine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostIt makes a lot of sense and was already explained last year. Stiverne agreed to risk his mandatory position against Breazeale, just like Povetkin did against David Price on a recent matchroom show.
When Ortiz failed a test, resulting in Stiverne being moved to the main event, it meant Breazeale already had a signed deal for a final eliminator, but no opponent. The WBC allowed him to face the highest available contender so he wouldn't have his opportunity taken away through no fault of his own.
That is how Breazeale ended up in a final eliminator. Whyte could have had the fight if he wanted, but obviously didn't want the fight on such short notice. But that's the reason Whyte got skipped over for that final eliminator. Whyte was then offered the next final eliminator.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostUmm cuz their corrupt? They were corrupt yesterday. They will be corrupt tomorrow. And you do the math that makes them corrupt today.
Hearn knows this. Idk why more mfers don't outright bring it up more often and hint at it more often.
This is basically what Hearn was saying.
Comment
Comment