Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: How Did WBC Order Whyte-Ortiz, Wilder-Breazeale Next?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Cantona View Post
    Get wilders balls out of your eyes and actually look at what's happening. I understand your HW division is weak and it must be very frustrating for you but let's not lose touch with reality here.
    Refute anything I said! spare me your emotions.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Kilrain View Post
      So Hearn thinks Whyte should be mandatory cos he beat Dale Allen and Lucas Browne. Riiiiight.

      I agree with putting Whyte in there with a top guy like Ortiz, because you should actually have to beat a decent opponent to get #1 status (not that Breazeale has, mind you).

      Obviously Wilder-Breazeale should be a voluntary though.
      You are right, and to make matters worse, Dillian Shyte said Ortiz is old, to make matters worse Luis is coming off a loss by KO and they still lack confidence!

      Comment


      • #43
        Hearn lying trying to get the focus off AJ and Wilder. Where is the proof Wilder signed on to fight someone else? I see through Hearn and what he trying to pull to avoid the fight

        Comment


        • #44
          Wilder better not fight another inhouse bum. It seems like Haymon/Team Wilder begged the WBC so that Wilder could avoid another fighter that their team cant control like Whyte and rather fight another meaningless inhouse corruption stinkfest.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
            Its very simple pal, Breazeale was sure to get the shot provided he beat Stiverne ; that was the initial agreement -- when Stiverne no longer is available Eddie himself approached Dominic and offered to fill in on the undercard of Wilder vs. Stiverne II.

            -- Mismatchroom lowballed Breazeale, Dominic still has the agreement and by virtue on this contract is in the position of power with the WBC -- in comes Molina as the next available ranked opponent ; as the contract was for that particular date to face Stiverne there was no time for any negotiations to be ordered by the WBC.

            Hearns can piss-off, he dropped the ball. End of story.
            your trolling never gets the recognition it deserves

            let wilder fight breezele for the pbc belt and whyte can fight wilders best foe in 40 fights

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
              Refute anything I said! spare me your emotions.
              How is it on Hearn when they pull stunts like an eliminator for 2nd mandatory. What is a second mandatory,and why isn't that made clear beforehand instead of letting Hearn spend up and pulling the rug at the end. The WBC hasn't got a shocking reputation out of nowhere my friend and I can assure you I'm not emotional at all, I can detect a lot of emotion in your original post though where you seem to be getting all nationalistic and a little bitter.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Kilrain View Post
                So Hearn thinks Whyte should be mandatory cos he beat Dale Allen and Lucas Browne. Riiiiight.

                I agree with putting Whyte in there with a top guy like Ortiz, because you should actually have to beat a decent opponent to get #1 status (not that Breazeale has, mind you).

                Obviously Wilder-Breazeale should be a voluntary though.
                Hearn is right to be cheesed

                Since breezeele got battered by Joshua he has done nothing (apart from be a pbc fighter) to warrant being mando

                whatever anyway still would like to see whyte Ortiz so its no bodder

                Comment


                • #48
                  Wilder - I truly believe he wants Joshua asap, but may hinder his chances right now because he wants (and to me deserves) to be treated like a champion and not a challenger who doesn't have a title.

                  Joshua - I truly believe he just wants to ride the marketing wave he generates. Doesn't care for giving Wilder a chance out of a position of feeling powerful and in charge. Just wants to do whatever his manager needs to make as much money as possible even if it doesn't involve Wilder.

                  Hearn - I truly believe he wants Wilder to lose his title do his man Joshua doesn't have to take that risk and can unify all of the belts. I also think he wants Whyte to have a crack at Wilder because Whyte is his man too. Then would love the upset of Whyte beating Wilder and now Hearn's men have all of the belts. Hearn would setup a rematch in the UK to where he knows Joshua would beat Whyte and have all of the belts.

                  Fans - We just want Joshua-Wilder now. Stop trying to wait and make everything a 5 year build up "Fight of the Century". Arum knows what happens when you "let it marinate". Do it now. Give chance for a rematch or even a trilogy (which seems like a thing of the past btw).

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Mrbamladen View Post
                    Really??? I've seen nothing of the kind. I just keep hearing Hearn say that. Could you provide a link please.
                    Haha the clown disappeared after you requested a link.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                      Well that can't be true because I posted over and over on this site that it was a final eliminator, only for everybody on this site to tell me I was wrong.
                      You weren't the only one. I posted this a few weeks back and was ignored lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP