Originally posted by The Big Dunn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Horn's Promoter Rips Top Rank For Approaching Crawford-Khan
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostLets look at the facts. Crawford is Horn's mando because the previous WBO WW champ, Mannny, ducked fighting him for reasons discussed in this thread, and fought Horn instead of Crawford.
Manny lost the fight. now Crawford is getting the shot he earned against the guy Manny fought instead of fighting him.
That isn't Crawford being protected, that is him getting screwed and then getting what he he already earned.
Play ****** all you want.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostYou can keep posting it, it will never make it true. Bob protected Manny. You see it you just will not admit it.
This is what happens when you fall so deep in love with an athlete that you can't admit they are not as good as you fantasize and dream they are.
Its gotten so bad that you want to just plug in names of other guys even though the facts refute your opinions.
Sad!
crawford is fighting jeff horn next. that should tell you enough.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JLC View PostWell, it’s kind of the promoters job to look ahead and map out a fighters career path and secure the next steps. It isn’t like Crawford is having sit downs with Arum and Khan negotiating a fight. As long as the fighter and trainers are focused on Horn, I don’t see why the promoters need to be sitting on their hands waiting on the fight to be over before reaching out to potential opponents.
Comment
-
The hypocrisy
Big dumb was backing last two fights and never had a go at him ducking spencer or Thurman lmao
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostDepends where the fight is. If it's outside the US I don't see how you can say no more world tour. Now if it's in the US and Manny pays his taxes, then the world tour may be stopped.
now you're saying bob is gonna set up pac vs loma. ??
so keeping pac away from crawford for the "world tour" is just the usual bs from you right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by WesternChamp View Postso crawford vs spence/thurman shouldnt be a problem next right???
Originally posted by WesternChamp View Postand bob is protecting crawford. cant have it both ways.
crawford is fighting jeff horn next. that should tell you enough.
Just because Bob had to protect Manny from Floyd, Zahir raheem and Crawford it doesn't mean he is protecting Crawford from Spence and Thurman.
Floyd, raheem and Crawford are all bigger men with as much speed and a far longer reach. The style they employ has always been difficult for Manny to deal with. He likely would lose all 3 fights so It made financial sense to delay or avoid these fights.
Crawford is the better boxer out of he, Thurman and Spence even though he is smaller. He likely beats Thurman and many think he'd beat Spence. So Bob has no reason to keep them from Crawford-unless he wants to keep Crawford's earnings low, which is another discussion.
It's a simple matter of style matchups and economics-not topics I'd expect a pac fan to have an educated opinion on relative to why fights do and don't get made.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostDepends where the fight is. If it's outside the US I don't see how you can say no more world tour. Now if it's in the US and Manny pays his taxes, then the world tour may be stopped.
crawford vs spence or thurman shouldnt be a problem next right???
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Postcommon sense tells you it would be seeing as how thurman and spence will unify before Crawford and the winner unifies
Uhh yes you can because they are 2 different fighters in 2 different positions at 2 different stages of their careers.
Just because Bob had to protect Manny from Floyd, Zahir raheem and Crawford it doesn't mean he is protecting Crawford from Spence and Thurman.
Floyd, raheem and Crawford are all bigger men with as much speed and a far longer reach. The style they employ has always been difficult for Manny to deal with. He likely would lose all 3 fights so It made financial sense to delay or avoid these fights.
On the flip side, Crawford is the better boxer than both Thurman and Spence even though he is smaller. He likely beats Thurman and many think he'd beat Spence. So Bob has no reason to keep them from Crawford-unless he wants to keep Crawford's earnings low, which is another discussion.
It's a simple matter of style matchups and economics-not topics I'd expect a pac fan to have an educated opinion on relative to why fights do and don't get made.
Comment
Comment