opinion on lomachenko

[HURTFEELINGS]

who said that? you are falling apart. you are setting up your own arguments that i never said. you are basically just arguing with yourself btw. it really is quite something. which bipoloar you will win!


answer: neither, both losers

DAMN, i GOT YOU TO ADMIT YOURE A LOSER

[daggum]

THE TROLL IN YOU IS BACK! I had more faith in you as a forum poster, I never said ANY of that. So I got a win over you....(dont worry, if you beat lou cypher, you will be considered better)

why did you have faith in me?

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I picked Russell to beat him, I picked Walters to beat him and I thought Rigo would give him a tough fight. Though begrudgingly, I must say yes.

I did the same thing with Pacquiao when he fought Marquez, Morales and then DLH. After a while, you have to say, okay I may not like him, but he's for real.

[daggum]

DAMN, i GOT YOU TO ADMIT YOURE A LOSER

your comprehension is slipping. the anti american guy who loves the american mikey garcia isn't making sense wow what a shocker lol

[Tony Trick-Pony]

yeah but the problem is great boxing to you is floyd fighting a bunch of bums and past it fighters. as long as he won he was great. thats not how you should judge boxing. you are doing the exact same thing with garcia. giving him fantasy points for not losing while not giving loma any credit cause he already lost even though hes taking on much tougher fights.

then when a guy who is taking on the tougher fights loses you say "see i knew he was a bum" so its a self fulfilling prophecy cause the tougher your opponents are the more likely you are to lose but you ignore this completely.

loma has fought a wide range of fighters from fast handed fighters, long boxer punchers, counter punchers, come forward fighters and has handled them all cept for the salido fight which was his second fight. garcia fought a bunch of slow come forward guys...the most diverse style he has seen is broner who stood there with his gloves up for 12 straight rounds. maybe the salido style is just a tough one for loma? maybe the other styles are tougher for garcia and thats why he only fights slow guys? we don't know but we got more evidence on the loma side the nte garcia side and thats why he's better. having more evidence is good. having less leads to subjectivity land where you live.

Great breakdown. The best want to truly fight every style. The cherry pickers focus on one style they know they can beat.

[HURTFEELINGS]

DAMN, i GOT YOU TO ADMIT YOURE A LOSER

Remember when you said SSMosely would lose to margacheato, swift wouldnt even come to the ring vs Matthysse, when you said Pac would KO floyd, when Kov would ko Ward....You lose all the time.........

[HURTFEELINGS]

Great breakdown. The best want to truly fight every style. The cherry pickers focus on one style they know they can beat.

Champions are considered the BEST, and Floyd beat more of them than ANYBODY. SO A WORD FOR YOU: CONTRADICTION

[daggum]

Remember when you said SSMosely would lose to margacheato, swift wouldnt even come to the ring vs Matthysse, when you said Pac would KO floyd, when Kov would ko Ward....You lose all the time.........

no cause i don't usually make predictions on fights and if I do they are usually things like "he will knock his head clean off in the first second" so i'm not sure how much stock they hold. i don't care who wins. i'm not you. stop projecting.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Champions are considered the BEST, and Floyd beat more of them than ANYBODY. SO A WORD FOR YOU: CONTRADICTION

Who brought Mayweather into this? This thread is about your opinion on Lomachenko. Try and keep up, bruh...

[daggum]

Champions are considered the BEST, and Floyd beat more of them than ANYBODY. SO A WORD FOR YOU: CONTRADICTION

this is the truth. politics never comes into play in boxing. if you are the champ then you must be amazing. i mean broner is a 4 division champ so he's clearly one of the best fighters in boxing history