opinion on lomachenko

[Willy Wanker]

I don't like Loma, I love him.

[HURTFEELINGS]

LETS GET THIS STR8,
Two guys fight the SAME GUY, the one that LOSES is considered better than the guy that beat the SAME GUY?
Grew up in America, WE KNOW WHY YOU THINK THIS

[daggum]

IM A FAN OF GREAT "BOXING" but dont claim Loma is good because of "boxing", when you denigrated Floyd for the same sh|t, I grew up in America, we know this routine. Remember when Pavlik was the second comming?

yeah but the problem is great boxing to you is floyd fighting a bunch of bums and past it fighters. as long as he won he was great. thats not how you should judge boxing. you are doing the exact same thing with garcia. giving him fantasy points for not losing while not giving loma any credit cause he already lost even though hes taking on much tougher fights.

then when a guy who is taking on the tougher fights loses you say "see i knew he was a bum" so its a self fulfilling prophecy cause the tougher your opponents are the more likely you are to lose but you ignore this completely.

loma has fought a wide range of fighters from fast handed fighters, long boxer punchers, counter punchers, come forward fighters and has handled them all cept for the salido fight which was his second fight. garcia fought a bunch of slow come forward guys...the most diverse style he has seen is broner who stood there with his gloves up for 12 straight rounds. maybe the salido style is just a tough one for loma? maybe the other styles are tougher for garcia and thats why he only fights slow guys? we don't know but we got more evidence on the loma side the nte garcia side and thats why he's better. having more evidence is good. having less leads to subjectivity land where you live.

[daggum]

LETS GET THIS STR8,
Two guys fight the SAME GUY, the one that LOSES is considered better than the guy that beat the SAME GUY?
Grew up in America, WE KNOW WHY YOU THINK THIS

yes roman martinez is better than lomachenko. he beat salido and loma didn't. great argument. if you look on lomas boxrec you will just see that one fight. LOSERRRRRRR

[HURTFEELINGS]

yeah but the problem is great boxing to you is floyd fighting a bunch of bums and past it fighters. as long as he won he was great. thats not how you should judge boxing. you are doing the exact same thing with garcia. giving him fantasy points for not losing while not giving loma any credit cause he already lost even though hes taking on much tougher fights.

then when a guy who is taking on the tougher fights loses you say "see i knew he was a bum" so its a self fulfilling prophecy cause the tougher your opponents are the more likely you are to lose but you ignore this completely.

loma has fought a wide range of fighters from fast handed fighters, long boxer punchers, counter punchers, come forward fighters and has handled them all cept for the salido fight which was his second fight. garcia fought a bunch of slow come forward guys...the most diverse style he has seen is broner who stood there with his gloves up for 12 straight rounds.

he has only fought 11 pro fights i guess thats a wide range (for certain people), WE KNOW HOW young fighters are matched.......to WIN against lessor fighters. He's LOST to "SALIDO the (GOAT)" apparently and Mikey beat the SAME guy. so you get more credit for losing if your skin color matches your agenda. TRY TO JUDGE OBJECTIVELY not based on skin color.

[deanrw]

I find he is ducking the Salido and Russell rematches.

[daggum]

he has only fought 11 pro fights, WE KNOW HOW young fighters are matched.......to WIN against lessor fighters. He's LOST to "SALIDO the (GOAT)" apparently and Mikey beat the SAME guy. so you get more credit for losing if your skin color matches your agenda. TRY TO JUDGE OBJECTIVELY not based on skin color.

yes and in those 11 fights he has fought a much wider range of fighters then garcia. that should tell you a lot. if the salido fight was loma's only fight then yes it would be ****** to say he's better than garcia but i just looked on boxrec and its not.

[HURTFEELINGS]

yes roman martinez is better than lomachenko. he beat salido and loma didn't. great argument. if you look on lomas boxrec you will just see that one fight. LOSERRRRRRR

Exactly, but he gets credit for a LOSS amongst a certain demo. You guys are just SHAMEFUL, its how you where raised, so I dont blame you, I blame your IGNORANT PARENTS. for raising IGNORANT KIDS

[RetroSpeed05]

he has only fought 11 pro fights i guess thats a wide range (for certain people), WE KNOW HOW young fighters are matched.......to WIN against lessor fighters. He's LOST to "SALIDO the (GOAT)" apparently and Mikey beat the SAME guy. so you get more credit for losing if your skin color matches your agenda. TRY TO JUDGE OBJECTIVELY not based on skin color.

what does the number of fight have to do with anything?

You could be 30-0 and only fight a bunch of cans. Number of fight's have nothing to do with anything its all about who you are fighting.

[HURTFEELINGS]

yes and in those 11 fights he has fought a much wider range of fighters then garcia. that should tell you a lot. if the salido fight was loma's only fight then yes it would be ****** to say he's better than garcia but i just looked on boxrec and its not.

Your WIDER RANGE is opinion ONLY....so beating champions doesnt matter......so how is Loma EVER gonna legitimately be better? If Mikey beats your daddy, YOURE CONSIDERED BETTER?
NOONE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION, HE FIGURED OUT SOMETHING YOU COULDNT, HE BEAT SOMETHING YOU COULDNT, BUT YOURE BETTER.....We know youre an american patriot....LOL
WE KNOW YOUR PEOPLES ROUTINE