Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

opinion on lomachenko

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by HURTFEELINGS View Post
    I DIDNT SAY HE WASNT GOOD. Your people keep saying this.......Im just saying he's over hyped when he LOST to a guy someone else beat, but this is over some peoples head. example: FOREMAN LOST TO..............Ali beat that guy. so the guy who lost to liston, frazier, norton......is supposed to be better?
    You guys try so hard, and are getting exposed for the biased (notice i left out racist) you are. ONE GUY LOSES TO SALIDO, ONE GUY BEAT SALIDO (the one who loses is considered better than the won WHO WON) vs the SAME GUY. HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THE BIAS. (I grew up in AMERICA) WE KNOW WHAT IT IS
    Well that's a triangle theory. You must be new if you don't know that triangle theories have been proven wrong over and over again. Duran beat Leonard. Leonard beat Hearns. So Duran definitely beats Hearns. Oh wait, no Hearns smashed Duran in two rounds. Frazier beat Ali. Foreman beat Frazier. Foreman would definitely beat Ali. Nope, Ali stops Foreman in 8. Wrong again. Mikey beats Salido. Salido beats Loma. So Mikey would have to beat Loma. Definitely not. Another one of course is Salido beats Loma. Martinez beats Salido. Martinez has to beat Loma. Nope, Loma smashes him to bits in five rounds, dominant the whole fight. Your line of thinking just doesn't work in reality. And you seem to think everything involves race, which is also nonsense.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by HURTFEELINGS View Post
      I DIDNT SAY HE WASNT GOOD. Your people keep saying this.......Im just saying he's over hyped when he LOST to a guy someone else beat, but this is over some peoples head. example: FOREMAN LOST TO..............Ali beat that guy. so the guy who lost to liston, frazier, norton......is supposed to be better?
      You guys try so hard, and are getting exposed for the biased (notice i left out racist) you are. ONE GUY LOSES TO SALIDO, ONE GUY BEAT SALIDO (the one who loses is considered better than the won WHO WON) vs the SAME GUY. HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THE BIAS. (I grew up in AMERICA) WE KNOW WHAT IT IS
      roman martinez beat salido so i guess he's better than loma. you keep getting owned over and over and yet you continue to keep saying the same thing over and over like you are trying to convince yourself if you just keep saying it, it will come true. it won't. your argument makes no sense. you are literally only bringing up one fight over and over. lomas resume sh-its all over garcias. just like ali's shi-t's over nortons and fraziers yet he lost to them. we are trying to help you so that you don't look so ******. i enjoy working with the mentally deranged so you should take my advice. there is this guy on here called larry who used to go around threatening to kill celebs like 50 cent and now after 10 years of boxingscene therapy he's only half crazy

      Comment


      • You cannot accuse Lomachenko of not being confident LOL


        Comment


        • Originally posted by deanrw View Post
          You cannot accuse Lomachenko of not being confident LOL


          Nice video, bruh...

          Comment


          • Even bigger fan now!

            Comment


            • Loads of energy, okay skills, lost to Salido. Good solid fighter. Fringe world level. I can see him beating Crolla 116-112. Should be a decent fight, but his work rate and grit down the stretch will see him through.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP