opinion on lomachenko

[daggum]

Exactly, but he gets credit for a LOSS amongst a certain demo. You guys are just SHAMEFUL, its how you where raised, so I dont blame you, I blame your IGNORANT PARENTS. for raising IGNORANT KIDS

what is your argument? you keep saying he lost to salido and garcia beat salido so garcia is better but that argument was disproven already. rocky martinez beat salido and loma destroyed martinez so that argument logically holds no water because loma can be better than someone who beat salido.

does loma not get credit for his wins only his losses? is that how you see boxing? this is why conmen like garcia and floyd trick you so easily. they keep winning against lesser comp and keep impressing you. pay more attention so you can stop getting tricked. i hate to see them taking advantage of the mentally challenged.

[TonyGe]

He's great and I don't care. Maybe he's too good but for some reason I'm indifferent.

[daggum]

Your WIDER RANGE is opinion ONLY....so beating champions doesnt matter......so how is Loma EVER gonna legitimately be better? If Mikey beats your daddy, YOURE CONSIDERED BETTER?
NOONE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION, HE FIGURED OUT SOMETHING YOU COULDNT, HE BEAT SOMETHING YOU COULDNT, BUT YOURE BETTER.....We know youre an american patriot....LOL
WE KNOW YOUR PEOPLES ROUTINE

yes its opinion that rigo, russell, linares, and walters have trickier styles then lipinets and zlatican. i guess we are just going to have to disagree if you think otherwise.

being a champion in boxing means almost nothing. lipinets beat no one even near the top 10 to become champ. yes the ratings are also "opinion" but at some point we have to establish some common ground for what constitutes a good fighter.

the rest of your post made little sense so i'm gonna have to say maybe?

[////]

loma is head & shoulders above his rivals. It's not even interesting. He needs a worthy opponent to come out of the woodwork.

[HURTFEELINGS]

what is your argument? you keep saying he lost to salido and garcia beat salido so garcia is better but that argument was disproven already. rocky martinez beat salido and loma destroyed martinez so that argument logically holds no water because loma can be better than someone who beat salido.

does loma not get credit for his wins only his losses? is that how you see boxing? this is why conmen like garcia and floyd trick you so easily. they keep winning against lesser comp and keep impressing you. pay more attention so you can stop getting tricked. i hate to see them taking advantage of the mentally challenged.

MY POINT EXACTLY! he's only had 11 fights, others have beaten champions, BUT.........America (eminems voice) we see you guys have done exactly what your parents taught you, but because of those rose (white) colored glasses, you guys try your best to avoid the truth, even after HUNDREDS of years of your deceitfulness and dishonorable ways. WE KNOW YOU GUYS CANT FIGHT OR COMPETE. THE JIG IS UP the whole world sees

[HURTFEELINGS]

yes its opinion that rigo, russell, linares, and walters have trickier styles then lipinets and zlatican. i guess we are just going to have to disagree if you think otherwise.

being a champion in boxing means almost nothing. lipinets beat no one even near the top 10 to become champ. yes the ratings are also "opinion" but at some point we have to establish some common ground for what constitutes a good fighter.

the rest of your post made little sense so i'm gonna have to say maybe?

Rigo was 2 weight classes below him, YOU GUYS SAY RUSSELL WASNT ****, THE SAME WITH WALTERS, BUT NOW THEY'RE GREAT WINS? the inconsistency of your argument is troubling. Salido was the GOAT, loma loss (BUT Mikey beat him?)......Russell was nothing but loma's win was AN ALL TIME WIN?

[daggum]

MY POINT EXACTLY! he's only had 11 fights, others have beaten champions, BUT.........America (eminems voice) we see you guys have done exactly what your parents taught you, but because of those rose (white) colored glasses, you guys try your best to avoid the truth, even after HUNDREDS of years of your deceitfulness and dishonorable ways. WE KNOW YOU GUYS CANT FIGHT OR COMPETE. THE JIG IS UP the whole world sees

but your point was disproven yet you keep saying it. why? its not suddenly going to become true if you keep saying. guess you have no real argument. garcia is america so you are saying he can't fight? loma is not american so you are saying he's better? you are spinning yourself into a dizzy coma

[KillaCamNZ]

P4P #1 right now. Skilled boxer, entertaining style. Love it.

[daggum]

Rigo was 2 weight classes below him, YOU GUYS SAY RUSSELL WASNT ****, THE SAME WITH WALTERS, BUT NOW THEY'RE GREAT WINS? the inconsistency of your argument is troubling. Salido was the GOAT, loma loss (BUT Mikey beat him?)......Russell was nothing but loma's win was AN ALL TIME WIN?

who said that? you are falling apart. you are setting up your own arguments that i never said. you are basically just arguing with yourself btw. it really is quite something. which bipoloar you will win!


answer: neither, both losers

[HURTFEELINGS]

but your point was disproven yet you keep saying it. why? its not suddenly going to become true if you keep saying. guess you have no real argument. garcia is america so you are saying he can't fight? loma is not american so you are saying he's better? you are spinning yourself into a dizzy coma

THE TROLL IN YOU IS BACK! I had more faith in you as a forum poster, I never said ANY of that. So I got a win over you....(dont worry, if you beat lou cypher, you will be considered better)