Comments Thread For: Crawford: No Reason Why Spence, Thurman Fights Can't Happen!

[mathed]

Crawford destroys Spence,Thurman, Garcia and Horn.....all easy work.

[mathed]

Spence will take your '0' if you venture in his direction.

I can’t wait for this fight. Bud gonna show the world that Spence isn’t on his level.

[MisanthropicNY]

It could also be that Spence had been out of camp and rusty and Crawford was in the middle of training. That's common too. But yeah the story could just be b.s. Spence is very good but Crawford is great IMO.

Which fight has proven Crawford's greatness? Please elaborate.

[Raggamuffin]

in EVERY fighter/promoter relationship, the fighter has the last say

before Pacquiao/Arum, I had never heard anyone suggest otherwise

this whole...... " talk to my promoter " angle..... is utter rubbish

a guy who insists that you should talk to his promoter, is hiding behind his promoter

even with Arum

Bradley proved it, and Crawford himself proved it in this very article

every fighter EVER, is 100% responsible/accountable for his resume'

What did Bud prove to you in this article?

[chrisJS]

Which fight has proven Crawford's greatness? Please elaborate.

It's not necessarily one fight hence why I don't think Buster Douglas is better than Sonny Liston despite owning a better win.

It's the overall skill set, talent level and absolute dominance and cleaning out of two divisions. Revisionist history is great but he was a 3-1 underdog vs. Gamboa, he went to a champions country and dominated and the Postol win was excellent especially considering how many felt he'd duck that challenge.

He's probably lost 3-4 rounds total and has shown to be a complete fighter. He's a great fighter perhaps not yet in a historical context as that is proven over a long time and one could argue the only fighter currently active in the game who's achieved greatness over a career is Pacquaio but guys like Crawford and Lomachenko are clearly great fighters well on their way to becoming defining fighters. I think Inoue is another with that look.

[aboutfkntime]

What did Bud prove to you in this article?

that boxing politics is only an impediment if the fighter allows it to be

but, as explained..... I already knew that

[MisanthropicNY]

It's not necessarily one fight hence why I don't think Buster Douglas is better than Sonny Liston despite owning a better win.

It's the overall skill set, talent level and absolute dominance and cleaning out of two divisions. Revisionist history is great but he was a 3-1 underdog vs. Gamboa, he went to a champions country and dominated and the Postol win was excellent especially considering how many felt he'd duck that challenge.

He's probably lost 3-4 rounds total and has shown to be a complete fighter. He's a great fighter perhaps not yet in a historical context as that is proven over a long time and one could argue the only fighter currently active in the game who's achieved greatness over a career is Pacquaio but guys like Crawford and Lomachenko are clearly great fighters well on their way to becoming defining fighters. I think Inoue is another with that look.

So his best win is a chinny featherweight who he beat at 135? LOL

Very easy to look great against weak competition. Don't even compare Crawford to Pacquiao lol - Pacquiao had already fought 3 ATG Hall of Famers by his mid 20s... Crawford is how old and has fought who?

I remember a guy named Jeff Lacy who was talked about in the same way...

[chrisJS]

So his best win is a chinny featherweight who he beat at 135? LOL

Very easy to look great against weak competition. Don't even compare Crawford to Pacquiao lol - Pacquiao had already fought 3 ATG Hall of Famers by his mid 20s... Crawford is how old and has fought who?

I remember a guy named Jeff Lacy who was talked about in the same way...

Lacy is a completely different case. Lacy hadn't unified any titles or beaten even a top 10 opponent much less cleaned out multiple divisions. Also Lacy was a limited ****er, Crawford has a lot of skills and can fight different ways.

Awful comparison.

[Raggamuffin]

So his best win is a chinny featherweight who he beat at 135? LOL

Very easy to look great against weak competition. Don't even compare Crawford to Pacquiao lol - Pacquiao had already fought 3 ATG Hall of Famers by his mid 20s... Crawford is how old and has fought who?

I remember a guy named Jeff Lacy who was talked about in the same way...

Pac was ko'd twice and almost ko'd by a jab from Hussein and beaten 3 times and then turned to HGH. Since then he never looked back-until Marquez anesthetized his big ass Jupiter sized brain for 4 minutes and some seconds!

[MisanthropicNY]

Pac was ko'd twice and almost ko'd by a jab from Hussein and beaten 3 times and then turned to HGH. Since then he never looked back-until Marquez anesthetized his big ass Jupiter sized brain for 4 minutes and some seconds!

Figured a simp thirsting over smuts with pics of a skank would go all Mangina for Crawford.

Everything you said doesn't make Crawford's weak ass resume any better, pu55y.