Originally posted by Rockybigblower
View Post
I know what you're trying to argue, but it's using pretty childlike logic.
In the example you give Hearn would balance the interests of his two clients, based primarily (as I mentioned before, on what they could be expected to bring to the fight themselves on the basis of previous income). It's not difficult. Clearly a 50/50 split would not be the best deal for Joshua would it, given that this would almost certainly represent a pay cut.
You're seriously struggling to understand the concept that a promoter will be more interested in making money for his own fighter than for someone else? Any money that Hearn gives to Wilder unnecessarily is money taken away from his own client (and Hearn himself)
Purse negotiations aren't based on "what a fighter is worth" they're based (like any business contract) on the relative bargaining strengths of the parties to the deal.
Comment