Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Report: Lomachenko-Linares Fight Finalized for May 12 at MSG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Arum will NEVER let Loma fight Rigo.. welp

    Arum will NEVER let Loma fight Linares.. welp.


    WHO NECKS?!

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
      Fights I want to see the MOST!!!

      Mikey/Loma
      Charlo/Jacobs
      GGG/Canelo
      Spence/Crawford
      Jacobs/Wilder
      I think you mean Joshua/ Wilder. Jacobs way too small LOL

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
        I'm glad you said whoever does it first, chronologically, will be the determining factor for you, because Crawford-Horn is getting moved back, possibly after Loma-Linares happens. So if Loma-Linares happens first, and Loma wins the title first, it will be really fun to watch you flip flop your position to suit your bias

        Comparing Linares to Horn... Hilarious. Next thing we know, you'll be comparing Indongo to GRJ...
        This is unbelievably childish and ignorant of you. I shouldn't be surprised.

        So you are clear, I wasn't suggesting Crawford would be because "he went first" FFS. I was pointing out that if Crawford wins a title in another division same as Loma, he would have a case for still being #1 p4p.

        He is #1 on this site and the TBRB board.

        I wasn't comparing Horn to Linares. How you got that is bizarre.

        You are trying to make this a " Dunn is saying Crawford is #1 because he is black thing." It isn't, but telling you that is like saying it to a brick wall.

        Since you are a clown, I will use a race neutral example. GGG is #1 on ESPN. You think if he beats Canelo he will drop from that spot? No.

        Crawford will still be #1 if he wins. If you feel otherwise, I don't care.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by 7not8 View Post
          Where does this leave Mikey now? They kinda snatched the rug out from under him. I guess he can go collect those Easter eggs.
          ***ed!!! Bring on Easter

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by deanrw View Post
            I think you mean Joshua/ Wilder. Jacobs way too small LOL
            Lpl. Yup Joshua/Wilder.

            Comment


            • #86
              Loma will carve him up but it will be a good name to add to his resume.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by New England View Post
                he took a ton of flush, hard shots and got destroyed by antonio freaking demarco. that fight wasn't just a product of cuts. it was a product of a polished guy getting outlasted until the polish wore off, and his vulnerabilites, his instincts when he's hurt and his chin, got exposed.

                what's he going to do against the best boxer in the world if he's getting tagged in the late rounds by antonio demarco?
                Antonio Demarco is 5'10 he now fights at welterweight. Lomachenko is a natural featherweight. That Demarco fight should actually be a good example to you of what can happen to the more talented guy when he fights some naturally bigger than him. What Linares struggled to do against Demarco, Loma will be trying to accomplish vs Linares, being the smaller man, except Loma is trying to do it against a much faster, more talented boxer in Linares than Linares tried to against Demarco. Linares also has more power at lightweight than Demarco does at welterweight, which is to say that if the size difference between Loma and Linares and Linares and Demarco is equal, and Lomachenko is now fighting two divisions above his natural division just like Linares was fighting an opponent naturally two divisions bigger than him in Demarco, then Lomachenko is now also facing more power, in addition to speed, relative to his natural size than Linares did vs Demarco, and yet you saw what even that did to Linares.

                So if anything, that should tell you the challenge Lomachenko is taking on here, and the danger. Weight jumping is no joke when you're not starting out at an artificially low weight like weight bullies do. Lomachenko started out as an average sized featherweight at best, far smaller than the biggest ones like Mikey or even Salido, so for him to move up is nowhere near the same thing as say Crawford moving up who started artificially low.
                Last edited by Boxing Logic; 03-13-2018, 12:49 PM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
                  Figured you'd have that take.

                  Tank-Cueller is where it's at!
                  LMAO, Tank said he was t ready for Loma. Said Loma isn't a draw, but his delusional fanboys say Loma is ducking. Tank can't make weight at 130 and would get schooled by Loma. His fans...he too young doe, not enough experience doe. Lol.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
                    That was young Linares. Those guys you are talking about were all way bigger than Lomachenko too. It's not just that Linares is good, it's that his one major weakness (chin) is not really appicable to Lomachenko's style to start with, combined with the fact he is also much bigger than Lomachenko. This is what so many Floyd fans for example never understood
                    I stopped reading once I got there....

                    number 1 im no floyd fan and anyone here can tell you that...

                    number 2 im not biased again anyone here can tell you that...

                    number 3 loma's style really? Accuracy is what's needed for soft chins like linares

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Oh well, Mikey call Danny!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP