Comments Thread For: Loeffler: The Burden is on Canelo To Prove He's a Clean Athlete

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Citizen Koba
    Deplorable Peacenik
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2013
    • 20443
    • 3,941
    • 3,786
    • 2,875,273

    #61
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    I said "most likely"

    which is exactly the same thing
    I'd say it isn't exactly the same thing. 'Most likely' implies the balance of probability favours a particular interpretation. 'Consistent with' merely means that the facts don't rule out that interpretation.

    I'm quibbling though, (although the use of language in the coverage of this incident has been interesting) what I was really getting at was whether there'd been some sort of official release I'd missed.

    Comment

    • icha
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 9506
      • 328
      • 368
      • 78,629

      #62
      Originally posted by Biolink
      Consideration of levels? Canelo had over 12x the amount of Contador who was banned. More than Contador and two other banned cyclists COMBINED... TWICE. So if 600-800 picograms Canelo had in his system is a small amount, the 50 that got Contador banned must have been microscopic.

      This whole levels argument is BS. Its setting a horrible precedent if you let this continue with no punishment for Canelo, period.
      it was stated by wada, not me, go file your complain...

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47366
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #63
        Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
        I'd say it isn't exactly the same thing. 'Most likely' implies the balance of probability favours a particular interpretation. 'Consistent with' merely means that the facts don't rule out that interpretation.

        I'm quibbling though, (although the use of language in the coverage of this incident has been interesting) what I was really getting at was whether there'd been some sort of official release I'd missed.


        it is exactly the same thing

        " consistent with "..... is suggesting that is the most likely scenario

        NOT saying that Canelo is clean..... just saying

        Breadman Edwards had a fair/logical take on the subject earlier

        as usual, his take is the same as mine

        Originally posted by Bread’s Response:
        I’m not ready to question Canelo’s career accomplishments just yet. That wouldn’t be fair. Let the due process take place. Hopefully there is a thorough investigation conducted by a reputable agency.

        If Canelo is found to be responsible for taking Clenbuterol I think he should be suspended for 18 months and fined 7 figures. If it is found that he ate contaminated meat, I think he should be subjected to random VADA testing for the remainder of his career, even when he doesn’t have a fight scheduled. No fine and no suspension. Very simple. Let’s see what happens.

        Originally posted by aboutfkntime
        this issue has got to be investigated fairly

        by " fairly "..... I mean, the same as for any other fighter

        if Canelo is found guilty..... fk him

        and I agree with Bread when it comes to year-long testing

        Canelo should be tested year-long, for the remainder of his career..... simply because he got popped already

        and that is NOT a harsh penalty, because Nonito Donaire enrolled for that voluntarily..... it should be mandatory

        Nonito deserves major credit for leading that cause

        Comment

        • Citizen Koba
          Deplorable Peacenik
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2013
          • 20443
          • 3,941
          • 3,786
          • 2,875,273

          #64
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          it is exactly the same thing

          " consistent with "..... is suggesting that is the most likely scenario

          NOT saying that Canelo is clean..... just saying

          Breadman Edwards had a fair/logical take on the subject earlier

          as usual, his take is the same as mine
          It may 'suggest' that to most people but that ain't actually what it means. I ain't gonna get in argument about semantics with you though. I think it's one of those cases where common usage (and maybe us all watching the same courtroom dramas) has made everyone think 'consistent with' is the same as likely, when all it actually means is that something doesn't contradict the available evidence. There could (and in this case appears to) be more than one scenario that is 'consistent' with the evidence... it's just that the contaminated meat theory is the one that is being put forward in most press on the issue.

          And I ain't saying that I think Canelo deliberately used Clenbuterol as a PED, not at all. I genuinely have no idea, and certainly when it comes down to potential punitive action believe he should be given the benefit of the doubt, although stringent testing from here on in is obviously a necessity.

          And yeah, I read Breadman's article - of course - dude is the best columnist in the sport for my money, and I have no real disagreement with his stance or yours. Like I say, man, I was just trying to find out if I'd missed some relevant information.
          Last edited by Citizen Koba; 03-10-2018, 07:11 PM.

          Comment

          • aboutfkntime
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 47366
            • 1,631
            • 3,563
            • 391,308

            #65
            Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
            It may 'suggest' that to most people but that ain't actually what it means. I ain't gonna get in argument about semantics with you though. I think it's one of those cases where common usage (and maybe us all watching the same courtroom dramas) has made everyone think 'consistent with' is the same as likely, when all it actually means is that something doesn't contradict the available evidence. There could (and in this case appears to) be more than one scenario that is 'consistent' with the evidence... it's just that the contaminated meat theory is the one that is being put forward in most press on the issue.

            And I ain't saying that I think Canelo deliberately used Clenbuterol as a PED, not at all. I genuinely have no idea, and certainly when it comes down to potential punitive action believe he should be given the benefit of the doubt, although stringent testing from here on in is obviously a necessity.

            And yeah, I read Breadman's article - of course - dude is the best columnist in the sport for my money, and I have no real disagreement with his stance or yours. Like I say, man, I was just trying to find out if I'd missed some relevant information.

            you're right..... it is semantics

            when I said, " most likely "..... what I meant is, " consistent with "

            " consistent with "..... is fine

            again..... NOT saying that Canelo is clean

            just saying..... that the people who have already decided that he is guilty based on the evidence to date..... are highly amusing to me..... and to bread


            Originally posted by Bread’s Response:
            I’m not ready to question Canelo’s career accomplishments just yet. That wouldn’t be fair. Let the due process take place. Hopefully there is a thorough investigation conducted by a reputable agency.

            If Canelo is found to be responsible for taking Clenbuterol I think he should be suspended for 18 months and fined 7 figures. If it is found that he ate contaminated meat, I think he should be subjected to random VADA testing for the remainder of his career, even when he doesn’t have a fight scheduled. No fine and no suspension. Very simple. Let’s see what happens.

            Comment

            • THEFRESHBRAWLER
              Undisputed Champion
              • Jul 2013
              • 9408
              • 372
              • 230
              • 124,804

              #66
              We tried to start the program; unfortunately, it was late,” Eric Gomez, vice president of Golden Boy Promotions explained to BoxingScene.com on Sunday. “There wasn't enough time to get the full benefit of VADA testing.”


              CHEATER CHEATER

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP