Hopkins, Jones & Toney: Let's Rank 'Em Again!

[Run]

Make an argument for him, wuss.

You claim you don't hate on fighters excessively.

Yet a thread concerning the rankings of James Toney, Roy Jones Jr, and Bernard Hopkins accidentally becomes a place for you to bash a fighter you don't like.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[DiegoFuego]

I'm commenting on what you do here.

You come to this site to rip negative critisisms on fighters you don't like. It FAR outweighs any comments on fighters you do like.

It's what makes you boring, biased and ignorant.

Until you bring an argument to the table for me, I don't think you have any reason to be talking to me, much less taking an active interest in my personal life in college. Cool?

[DiegoFuego]

You claim you don't hate on fighters excessively.

Yet a thread concerning the rankings of James Toney, Roy Jones Jr, and Bernard Hopkins accidentally becomes a place for you to bash a fighter you don't like.

I don't like Hopkins either. Do I rank Toney above him?

[Bozo_no no]

It's one thing to critisize Castillo for not making weight,

but to dwell on it and express so much anger in so many threads and topic and in your avatar like you do...

that's excessive. And boring.

[Easy-E]

Man, I don't just pick a fighter and hate on them. I think their is real logic behind suggesting Bernard passed Roy this weekend. Actually, I don't even think it's that debatable. I think Hopkins is clearly above Roy in terms of all time greatness. A lot of people I respect off this forum told me the same thing. I know it's not even a week after the fight, but I seriously think Hopkins surpassed Roy with that win. Is there anything wrong with thinking that?

This isnt the first time youve targeted Roy.

I know people will think that Hopkins passed him after this weekend because his win was so suprising.
But obviously its debatable, because Roy was pound for pound king, champ in 4 weight classes, the first fighter since 1908 or some **** to win a HW title starting from middleweight, fighter of the decade and one of the most dominant champions of all time. Roy in his prime lost less then 10 rounds in about 15 fights or so.
On second thought, I dont relly think its debatable, because Roy blows him away, but since Roy has looked like **** latley and Hopkins looked good in one fight, people are hyping up Bhop. Its understandable, but incorrect.
Roy was the far better fighter.

[DiegoFuego]

It's one thing to critisize Castillo for not making weight,

but to dwell on it and express so much anger in so many threads and topic and in your avatar like you do...

that's excessive. And boring.

let's get into your personal life a sec before you criticize mine again? how old are you and what do you do for a living that has you so bitter you have to attack me every chance you get and live vicariously through fighters like Roy Jones?

[Truth]

Roy Jones beat Toney, like Smokin' said, its not Roy's fault he has trouble making weight. The Hopkins excuse I can see because Hopkins simply wasn't as good of a fighter at the time, but the Toney one I can't see because Toney was great at that point.

[Parody]

Damn, Diego is on fire, 15 posts in 20 minutes

[Bozo_no no]

Until you bring an argument to the table for me, I don't think you have any reason to be talking to me, much less taking an active interest in my personal life in college. Cool?

4th time in this thread:

Everytime I bring an argument to you, you have nothing to say and leave the thread.

That's because your "arguments" are basied unwarrented instances of hating.

[Parody]

This isnt the first time youve targeted Roy.

I know people will think that Hopkins passed him after this weekend because his win was so suprising.
But obviously its debatable, because Roy was pound for pound king, champ in 4 weight classes, the first fighter since 1908 or some **** to win a HW title starting from middleweight, fighter of the decade and one of the most dominant champions of all time. Roy in his prime lost less then 10 rounds in about 15 fights or so.
On second thought, I dont relly think its debatable, because Roy blows him away, but since Roy has looked like **** latley and Hopkins looked good in one fight, people are hyping up Bhop. Its understandable, but incorrect.
Roy was the far better fighter.

Exactly my friend, I find it funny that even Tarver has fans. lol