Originally posted by Boxing Logic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford: I Don't Rate Lomachenko as P4P 1 or Fighter of The Year!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostI see no lies here.
But neither are Idongo and Felix Diaz as wins...
Would be even more scandalous to fight just twice and get the award with that type of win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by satiev1 View Post10 years from now we will all remember the legend of indongo and how crawford rose to p4p status after beating a gamboa and indongo. They need to do legendary fights on hbo many years from now regarding the build up to the fight.
I thought Crawford was smater, I'm quite disappointed.
Dude listening 2 much Dontae Nation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cashtro View PostSo you're upset that someone is giving THEIR opinion and you don't agree with it? That makes him shady?
He doesn't have to call a fellow american like Sosa "basic" and roast the boxingyearyear of his stablemate.
That's quite unprofessional.
Idongo and Diaz aren't a great year either, Joshua with Klit and Takam is as good.
I don't know what makes Bud think that he's a SO OBVIOUS fighter of the year,
Comment
-
Originally posted by FLY TY View PostHe beats Linares, Easter, AND Mikey, and unifies at 135, you have an argument. He probably doesn't fight all 3 though.
Crawford beating Thurman and Spence at 147 and becoming undisputed > Loma beating any 2 at 135, and doing the same.
Moot point though. I don't think Loma fights Easter, and I don't think he beats Mikey if they fight, and I think Bud loses to Spence.
Dude is fighting for a title in a 4 division.
Let's see if Spence can move up in a fourth division (here 168) and clip a guy of Broner's level.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ajvar View PostLoma had 129 lbs in Rigo fight. He was 126 lbs 2 years ago. Not so huge difference at weight against Rigo as some faulty as haters trying to show.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostI've been saying exactly the same things as this for ages & getting flamed regularly by lomasexuals. Yet now that bud said the same truths many are now agreeing that were talking sh before,& others who were on buds nuts are now full-blown Crawford haters since he committed the cardinal deadly sin of all sins by saying hurtful truths about" GAWD lomachenko",& that means the sect of lomasexuals found a new enemy#1......
Comment
-
Originally posted by harwri008 View PostI agree with Crawford but this isn't going to win him any fans. Unfortunately, it's not the fans that decides these kinds of awards. It's the boxing writers. They're more likely to identify with Lomachenko than Crawford.
I don't think Crawford gets the credit for beating th smaller Lomachenko the same way he got for beating the smaller, much older, inactive Rigondeaux. I could care less if some people gave Rigondeaux a chance. The fight was a mismatch and it didn't even live up to that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostEh? Lomachenko weighed 137.4 the morning of the fight, most likely more by the time the fight happened. Rigondeaux weighed 130 WITH HIS CLOTHES ON.Last edited by Ajvar; 02-02-2018, 04:37 AM.
Comment
Comment