Originally posted by Dr.Cool
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Spence's Trainer: Why is Thurman Getting Pass Brook Didn't Get?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Dr.Cool View PostPeople are being hard on Thurman for fighting twice in three years, while in his prime.
And everyone can stop the injury/surgery bs. That is bs, because Thurman knew he needed it immediately after fighting Garcia and Thurman WAITED FOR MONTHS to get the surgery. Then he is crying that he had surgery.
Thurman has been ducking Spence for years. Mayweather wanted Thurman-Spence on one of his undercards years ago. Where a win, could have very easily let to a fight with Floyd. Thurman said Spence needed to beat some top guys. Then he KO'd the previously never KO'd Algieri, and then KO'd Bundu who went the distance against Thurman, and Thurman was still making excuses.
Spence has been calling out Thurman for years. Literally. Thurman always has some excuse. He can fight Vargas or whoever else he wants next, he can even fight Rod Salka, that does not matter. But to have a rematch with Porter before facing Spence is ducking, there is nothing else to call that. I mean dang, Mayweather and Ward even fought more then Thurman does. For a champion, who is undoubtedly in his prime, to only fight once every year or two is a disgrace.
Spence was calling him out when he was a prospect, it would have made zero sense to fight him then. He only won a title in May and now he has proven that he's a top level fighter and then some. So now it's a realistic fight to make.
You people are always saying **** like 'if he doesn't want the fight he should just say it'...well guess what, Thurman has word for word said he's not ready right now, physically he's not 100% and wants to get active. Thurman not acknowledging Spence is clearly bothering Spence and building the 'he's scared' narrative among casual fan like yourself, thus making the fight bigger and better.
Don't get me wrong, I would rather see the fight in late 2018...but fighting him a few months later than that isn't going to kill anybody. Thurman and Spence are the two top fighters with PBC, the fight is gonna happen when Al Haymon thinks it's ready.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostBelts aren’t an excuse to fight inferior competition. Spence-Thurman is the fight at 47 right now. They’re clearly the top two fighters in the division. Whether it’s for no belts or 100 belts is irrelevant.
BTW, you tell a fighter that sacrifice so much for those titles that titles are irrelevant. Titles are always relevant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr.Cool View PostPeople are being hard on Thurman for fighting twice in three years, while in his prime.
And everyone can stop the injury/surgery bs. That is bs, because Thurman knew he needed it immediately after fighting Garcia and Thurman WAITED FOR MONTHS to get the surgery. Then he is crying that he had surgery.
Thurman has been ducking Spence for years. Mayweather wanted Thurman-Spence on one of his undercards years ago. Where a win, could have very easily let to a fight with Floyd. Thurman said Spence needed to beat some top guys. Then he KO'd the previously never KO'd Algieri, and then KO'd Bundu who went the distance against Thurman, and Thurman was still making excuses.
Spence has been calling out Thurman for years. Literally. Thurman always has some excuse. He can fight Vargas or whoever else he wants next, he can even fight Rod Salka, that does not matter. But to have a rematch with Porter before facing Spence is ducking, there is nothing else to call that. I mean dang, Mayweather and Ward even fought more then Thurman does. For a champion, who is undoubtedly in his prime, to only fight once every year or two is a disgrace.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chepboxingking View PostKey words, RIGHT NOW. you're right, RIGHT NOW is the fight to make.l, but you can't blame Thurman for not making taking the fight the past 2 years.
BTW, you tell a fighter that sacrifice so much for those titles that titles are irrelevant. Titles are always relevant.
As for the belts, f.uck em. All that sacrificing to win them is bull****. Once you win the title, it’s won. The boxing public knows who’s who. And we don’t need belts to tell us that. Thurman loses more by not fighting Spence in order to hang onto the belts. Than he he does by dropping the belts in order to fight Spence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Cruise View PostDont unifications trump mandatories with the IBF?
I forget which orgs follow that rule and which dont.Originally posted by hitking View PostWho cares about mandatories. They could strip every belt Thurman has. If he beats Spence, he doesn’t need a belt anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mrlopez View PostI was talking about how Brook had to fight Spence because he was the mando, or get stripped. As for Thurman/Spence, Im all for it, after Thurman has a tuneup 1st. Spence just had his tuneup vs LP. Thurman is coming back from surgery/injury.
Comment
-
-
Thurman DESERVES a pass because he is an injured champion that is deserving of rest and a rehabilitation fight. U learn from "others" mistakes......Brook came back too soon and paid the price, so why should Thurman capitalize on a WRONG MOVE!??
Comment
Comment