Why Floyd envies Lomachenko

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Nobody really cares its true. Everyone knows he would demolish him with ease in a rematch. Salido hit him with non stop low blows and you could still argue lomachenko won that fight just barely.

All all time greats have losses and its no shame to lose in your second pro fight against an terribly dirty fighter.

That fight is talked about on boxingscene every time Loma is mentioned. Somebody obviously cares.


All all time greats have losses

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/*****_s.gif[/IMG]
Floyd Mayweather, Rocky Marciano, Ricardo Lopez just off the top of my head

[RussB23]

That fight is talked about on boxingscene every time Loma is mentioned. Somebody obviously cares.


All all time greats have losses

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/*****_s.gif[/IMG]
Floyd Mayweather, Rocky Marciano, Ricardo Lopez just off the top of my head

Yea its mentioned by salty loma haters to try and bring him down. Even though you know he wipes the floor with salido if they ever fight again.


Muhammad ali is viewed as the GOAT by many, he has like 5 losses. Roy jones jr has losses, SRL, Duran. I can name many more.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Yea its mentioned by salty loma haters to try and bring him down. Even though you know he wipes the floor with salido if they ever fight again.


Muhammad ali is viewed as the GOAT by many, he has like 5 losses. Roy jones jr has losses, SRL, Duran. I can name many more.

Yep they have losses but you said all ATG have losses. Just correcting you on another thing you’re wrong about.
Also RJJ, SRL, and Duran weren’t as disciplined as Floyd. Which a few of there losses could be attributed to. Floyd didn’t drink, smoke, rap, or do *******.

Yea its mentioned by salty loma haters to try and bring him down

He actually lost the fight so why wouldn’t it be mentioned? Every fighter record is criticized. Why is Lomachenco exempt from this?
So if you acknowledge Loma has a loss you’re a hater?

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Floyd is the most successful pro of all time and with the changes in technology, will go down forever as the most successful pro in history. Adjusted for inflation, his records will never be broken.

How is this so hard to understand? Loma is well behind Floyd even in the plus minus category (I believe). It’s not Floyd fault that Loma stayed in the amateur feasting on teenagers.

[RussB23]

Yep they have losses but you said all ATG have losses. Just correcting you on another thing you’re wrong about.
Also RJJ, SRL, and Duran weren’t as disciplined as Floyd. Which a few of there losses could be attributed to. Floyd didn’t drink, smoke, rap, or do *******.

Yea its mentioned by salty loma haters to try and bring him down

He actually lost the fight so why wouldn’t it be mentioned? Every fighter record is criticized. Why is Lomachenco exempt from this?
So if you acknowledge Loma has a loss you’re a hater?

Why do you seem bitter against loma? So what? he lost to salido. Big deal hes still the best fighter in the sport and is clowning everyone.

[Shape up]

TBE 50-0 deal with it crybaby.

So by that answer I will take it as you now realise Loma is leaps and bounds ahead of fluid after 11 fights and there is no possible way to argue otherwise

[travestyny]

So by that answer I will take it as you now realise Loma is leaps and bounds ahead of fluid after 11 fights and there is no possible way to argue otherwise

Then according to your logic, who is Loma not leaps and bounds ahead of after 11 fights?


Is he the greatest of all time in your opinion?

[Shape up]

Mayweather 21 y.o. World Champion as a pro, record 18-0, Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year

Lomachenko 21 y.o record as a pro 0-0

What's wrong with the comparison of 11 fight each, it the fairest way to establish who has achieved more, age is baseless, no common ground due to Loma still being an ameteur, do you agree that after 11 fights lomas resume blows floyds out of the water

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

So by that answer I will take it as you now realise Loma is leaps and bounds ahead of fluid after 11 fights and there is no possible way to argue otherwise

No you’re just comparing fights and I’m comparing age. Two different perspectives. If you don’t take into account his age when discussing this then you're being biased.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

What's wrong with the comparison of 11 fight each, it the fairest way to establish who has achieved more, age is baseless, no common ground due to Loma still being an ameteur, do you agree that after 11 fights lomas resume blows floyds out of the water

Age is only baseless if you hate Floyd. It’s not Floyd fault that a grown Lomachenko stayed in the amateurs to feast on teenagers. It hurt his earning potential and may hurt his professional legacy. If he had turned pro after his first gold medal he’d be making more than 1.5 million. You can say the 11 fights blow him out the water and you can also say at 30 years old Floyd was 100times more accomplished.