So if he's p4p number 1 then salido must be p4p number 0
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: The Argument For (And Against) Lomachenko Being #1 P4P
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Steven Mccowan View PostHaha. Come,on,pete rose. Broner c level hype job who looked lile **** anytime he stepped up. Who was in physical prime? Zlaticanin? And yeah beating a 37 yr old who had a reputation of being a ring iq wizard who was feared by all including tyson is a big win. The guy everyone said was an alltime great. Top 20 all time lol. The guy who begged for the fight. And also the guy who got mastered, exposed as a one diminsional "fighter" and one who has nothing but a plan a is a good win. Not great because i always said rigo was a hype job that the dorks liked to hype, and that he would get broken down mentally by loma and he did. Just like loma,would easily beat mikey. I know i know ppl will say thats ****** but remember that ppl thought it was ****** to say he would school russell, walters, rigo etc. 4 opponents quitting halfway through a scheduled 12 rd fight is very special.
As for “schooling a ring wizard.” I wouldn’t consider landing 16% of your punches schooling. He overwhelmed a much smaller, much older fighter. Sorry if I’m not ready to tell Ray Robinson to move over just yet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrShakeAndBake View Postrigo was 130 and Loma
was 137 on fight day. Nice try though. Too bad for you Loma schooled him without size advantage. Craw has same
skills, dont think so... Lets see Crawford go up in two weight classes and see what happens
BTW, why you scared you Lomachencko to go up a challenge Crawford? I mean, he is Mr Hi-Tech and Crawford isn’t close to his skill level. Should be easy work for Loma right???
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostProfessional experience means a lot too. There's a reason Hopkins lost his debut at aged 24 to a nobody but became a good fighter. I get it you think Salido beats even this version of Loma but he's improved and proven he's got MUCH better over time. He's learned and he's still learning it's part of being a pro boxer I guess.
Loma had next to no pro experience as a fact. Sure he had pedigree but experience means a lot in pro boxing.
Top Rank had nothing to gain by Mosley getting a controversial re-match win over Oscar either whilst on roids. I said nothing was sinister and the ref just ****** and Salido cheated. Is what it is and are all fact based comments.
I feel people want to punish his boldness but I prefer to give credit to a guy that's tried to do stuff nobody else did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostCrawford is fighting for a belt in his third division. So obviously, he’s done his fair share of moving up.
BTW, why you scared you Lomachencko to go up a challenge Crawford? I mean, he is Mr Hi-Tech and Crawford isn’t close to his skill level. Should be easy work for Loma right???
Comment
-
Originally posted by vitali1999 View PostArticle says do you prefer a guy who's 39-0 against 🍅 cans or a 10-0 guy who's fought the best. Hmmm, wilder is 39-0 and he and his fans think he's the best and he's fought nothing but tomato cans. So I guess it depends on who you axe to death. BUMSQUAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
Imo anyone who has Loma ranked pfp best doesn't know the sport, doesn't respect the sport, and doesn't need to call themselves a fan of the sport. If you like him and say, he's MY pfp best, fine. But when you say that he's pfp best without the "MY" before it lol...then I don't respect your boxing opinion, sorry.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostCrawford is fighting for a belt in his third division. So obviously, he’s done his fair share of moving up.
BTW, why you scared you Lomachencko to go up a challenge Crawford? I mean, he is Mr Hi-Tech and Crawford isn’t close to his skill level. Should be easy work for Loma right???
Why should Loma go all the way to 147 to fight right now that would be 5 weight classes from his start in his 12th fight? So should Crawford fight GGG now?
Nobody said Crawford is a bum or unskilled GTFOH with that yet you say Loma is a coward and a bum?
Comment
-
lomachenko is not p4p #1 he LOST to a fighter who going into the fight had DOUBLE DIGIT losses.
i rewatched the fight again and had it for salido 7-5 and the "low blows" alot of those were NOT "low blows" people is over exaggerating the "low blows" to validate a case for lomachenko. He's NOT better than ggg, crawford, thurman, spence, or ANY other UNDEFEATED fighter bc he LOST and he did NOT avenge that loss and he also LOST to an individual who had DOUBLE DIGIT losses.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostImo anyone who has Loma ranked pfp best doesn't know the sport, doesn't respect the sport, and doesn't need to call themselves a fan of the sport. If you like him and say, he's MY pfp best, fine. But when you say that he's pfp best without the "MY" before it lol...then I don't respect your boxing opinion, sorry.
Comment
Comment