Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: The Argument For (And Against) Lomachenko Being #1 P4P

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
    I can't argue he's number #1 because he just dominated a P4P and made him quit. But I also would put my $$$ on Mikey if/when they fight. Sht if your $$$ Is good I'll bet with you...At least you didn't make excuse for that loss. Even Lomachenko had no problem with it.
    i think loma will dominate mikey when it happens (if it happens)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
      Jack@ss Lomachenko didn't go up 2 full weight classes. Rig. did. This RTARD doesn't even know which one was Rig.
      This was about crawford . response ****** hoe- try to follow the thread hahaha. you ****** meth head pendejo.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by hitking View Post
        For one, Broner isn’t a C level fighter. Secondly, is Lomachencko beating a 37yr old fighter moving up two divisions more impressive than Mikey moving up and beating a guy in his physical prime?
        Haha. Come,on,pete rose. Broner c level hype job who looked lile **** anytime he stepped up. Who was in physical prime? Zlaticanin? And yeah beating a 37 yr old who had a reputation of being a ring iq wizard who was feared by all including tyson is a big win. The guy everyone said was an alltime great. Top 20 all time lol. The guy who begged for the fight. And also the guy who got mastered, exposed as a one diminsional "fighter" and one who has nothing but a plan a is a good win. Not great because i always said rigo was a hype job that the dorks liked to hype, and that he would get broken down mentally by loma and he did. Just like loma,would easily beat mikey. I know i know ppl will say thats ****** but remember that ppl thought it was ****** to say he would school russell, walters, rigo etc. 4 opponents quitting halfway through a scheduled 12 rd fight is very special.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
          Let's not forget he fought the last 2 guys who were 1 & 2 weight classes SMALLER than him.

          I've been looking at the 126 and 122 lbers to see who he fights next??? You have any ideas??? Maybe

          Daniel Roman
          Gary Russell Jr. again
          Oscar Valdez

          ???
          With his record he can do no wrong at this time. He is a gem in the lower weight classes

          Comment


          • Originally posted by cameltoe View Post
            I think he was talking about Wilder
            Thats what I was saying. I prefer the guy who's 10-0 fighting the best.

            Comment


            • 1: Thurman
              2: Crawford
              3: Garcia

              If he chases "Greatness" and jumps up divisions (Garcia), just as his last opponent did. Then he would p4p. YOU DONT GET P4P FOR BEATING SOMEONE YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BEAT.
              Last edited by HURTFEELINGS; 12-16-2017, 05:18 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Dean_Razorback View Post
                i think loma will dominate mikey when it happens (if it happens)
                And that's why they fight.... U got Loma and I got Mikey. Mikey is NOT 38 year old 2 weight class smaller though.
                Last edited by Shadoww702; 12-16-2017, 06:56 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Mr Objecitivity View Post
                  No, but if Lomachenko is DEMANDED to box against Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford (both who are above his own natural weight division), then going by the same logic, reasoning and standard, both Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford should also box against Canelo Alvarez and Gennady Golovkin (against opponents above their own nautural weight divisions as well).

                  If Lomachenko shouldn't be ranked number 1 pound for pound because he hasn't beaten the likes of Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford yet. Then who else deserves to be ranked pound for pound number 1 because they accomplished better feats?
                  You Sir should stop using common sense , logic and facts because it upsets the people in this forum....my I add that mikey quit on salido and mikey also bailed on Top Rank when Arum wanted to pit him against gamboa.....I felt like Salido was gonna spark mikey up when robert and mikey called it off ......I dont like Arum (political differences)but he sure does put up quality fights and has good fighters in his stable plus he is not scared to match them up tough
                  Last edited by TexasCowBoy; 12-16-2017, 08:33 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by vitali1999 View Post
                    With his record he can do no wrong at this time. He is a gem in the lower weight classes
                    Can't argue with you there!!! For only like 10 pro fights under his belt??? That's why I wont argue he's P4P#1. Did he lose bfore?? Yes but he erased it in record time. To me when it comes to the 2 P4P #1's its what do you favor. Uniting ALL the belts in a division easily???
                    Or destroying P4Pers??? I have NO issue with anyone saying Crawford or Loma.
                    Last edited by Shadoww702; 12-16-2017, 08:40 PM.

                    Comment


                    • He has to do a lot more

                      Beating a guy moving up 2 divisions, right after fighting no hopers like Marriaga and Martinez, doesn't cut it.

                      Loma can't even fight on the inside.
                      How is he better than Spence???

                      More Bob Arum smoke and mirrors.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP