Some Marquez-Pacquaio myths that need clearing up

[IronDanHamza]

im not saying everything has to be a robbey. im saying, the 3rd was more clear of a win for marquez yet the other poster said #3 was close, then he agreed with the result of #1 being a draw. if anything #3 is the least close fight out of all 4. #1 should have went to pac, #2 went to pac, #3 should have went to marquez, #4 went to marquez.

I wouldn't disagree with 3 being the least close.

And I agree with you that 1 was closer than 3.

Just stating that 3 was close aswell.

[HarvardBlue]

If I'm not mistaken there were no random testing for the 4th fight so if anyone suspected that Pacquiao was on PEDs before then there's no reason to believe he wasn't also on PEDs for that fight also. No one suspected/accused Marquez of anything before the 4th (other than drinking his own urine) but if he was on PEDs for that fight then I suspect he simply evened the playing field.

I thought Marquez won the 3rd fight but Pacquiao made rounds 8-12 very competitive. Especially the 12th. I thought Marquez put in enough work in the previous rounds to secure a victory. I don't have much of a problem with first 2 fights.

Pacquiao should have won all 3 Bradley fights. Arum milked 3 fights with that first BS decision. He tried to do the same with Horn but Manny finally wised up and refused to partake. Arum will get his way if he can get a robbery over Crawford.