Some Marquez-Pacquaio myths that need clearing up

[WesternChamp]

What? He did score a knockdown WTF you talking about?

my mistake. i meant to say the judges. had the judges score it right.

[Bjl12]

ok, so it took pac 2 shots to beat bradley but it still took marquez 4 shots to beat pac, you happy? LOL!!!!!!!!

Pac won 1, 3, and 4.

Are you bragging about a draw in the 2nd fight?

Damn, definitely a MarGGGarito nuthuGGer lmfao

[chrisJS]

but the reasons you used doesnt make sense. you said pac was juiced up for all 4 fights, and then you make claims that marquez hurt pac in the first two fights, then goes on and said marquez couldnt have been on peds in the 4th fight since pac was able to hurt him in that fight and it was one of marquez worst performance. do you see what you did wrong there?? LOL!! you're basically using the same reasons for BOTH pac and marquez but you're only blaming manny. LOL.

Pointing out hypocrisy. I'm assuming Pacquaio was 100% clean the whole time but Marquez was 100% roided in fight IV?

[WesternChamp]

Pac won 1, 3, and 4.

Are you bragging about a draw in the 2nd fight?

Damn, definitely a MarGGGarito nuthuGGer lmfao

no idiot. i am doing what TS is daring.

he said if the pac fans is saying it took marquez 4 shots to beat pac then it also took pac 2 ****s to beat bradley.

so i said ok, it took pac 2 ****s to beat bradley but it still took marquez 4 shots to beat pac.. why do i even have to explain this?? LOL

[WesternChamp]

Pointing out hypocrisy. I'm assuming Pacquaio was 100% clean the whole time but Marquez was 100% roided in fight IV?

yeah in you.

this is what you said --

Also, Pacquaio was most likely roided for ALL FOUR fights. You can't be completely adamant that Marquez was 100% juiced but then oblivious to the fact Pacquaio could have been on something given all the signs during his career.

[chrisJS]

yeah in you.

this is what you said --

Also, Pacquaio was most likely roided for ALL FOUR fights. You can't be completely adamant that Marquez was 100% juiced but then oblivious to the fact Pacquaio could have been on something given all the signs during his career.

I sti stand by that you can't be 100% sure Marquez was juiced and say Pacquaio 100% wasn't. I said "most likely".

For what it's worth Marquez was already a HOF fighter and complete and great fighter before Memo joined. Pacquaio was not remotely anything near that when he joined Roach and then Ariza. Also would Memo really risk it all again? That point can be argued he'd be very careful to be clean.

[IronDanHamza]

I was adament that Pacquaio-Marquez 3 was a robbery but I watched it back not too long ago and thought it was close.

Anyway, for what it's worth I had the first fight a draw and Marquez winning 2 & 3.

[chrisJS]

I was adament that Pacquaio-Marquez 3 was a robbery but I watched it back not too long ago and thought it was close.

Anyway, for what it's worth I had the first fight a draw and Marquez winning 2 & 3.

That seems to be about the consensus 3 wins Marquez 1 draw or 4 wins Marquez.

[WesternChamp]

I sti stand by that you can't be 100% sure Marquez was juiced and say Pacquaio 100% wasn't. I said "most likely".

For what it's worth Marquez was already a HOF fighter and complete and great fighter before Memo joined. Pacquaio was not remotely anything near that when he joined Roach and then Ariza. Also would Memo really risk it all again? That point can be argued he'd be very careful to be clean.

but you cant say marquez wasnt juicing because pac hurt him and it was one of his worst performance!! then goes on and say pac was prolly juicing in all 4 fights! even though you said marquez was able to hurt pac in the first two fights. do you not get what you're saying???????

you're saying marquez couldnt have been on the juice since it was his worst performance and he was hurt by manny, THEN you said pac was juicing in all 4 fights, even though you said marquez put pac on ***** street multiple times.

so going by your logic, how can pac be on the juice, if marquez was able to hurt him???

[WesternChamp]

I was adament that Pacquaio-Marquez 3 was a robbery but I watched it back not too long ago and thought it was close.

Anyway, for what it's worth I had the first fight a draw and Marquez winning 2 & 3.

how can you said the 3rd was close but you agree with the first being a draw? out of those 3 fights, the 3rd was the most clear win for marquez. if i have to give one to him, it would be #3.