Is the WBO a worthless belt? Kovalev vs Shabranskyy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lou Cipher
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 6901
    • 390
    • 286
    • 26,603

    #41
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
    We've been researching these organizations for 30+ years. We're happy to discuss anything about them that you wish.

    But since you're more interested in childish insults, we're going to assume that even you know you don't have your facts straight.
    Who is we? Under what capacity do you study them? Don't forget ass hole, you posted a thread asking about the WBO so dont act like youre some authority now.

    You are not.

    Lou Cipher is the authority on these boards. Just because Lou Cipher ruthlessly buries all the ignorant fanboy wannabes on here, using all levels of maturity from low to high with savage expertise, do not get that confused with any doubt of Lou Cipher's VAST and SUPERIOR knowledge of all things Boxing. Including the belts. more than one of which I have right here with me.

    Comment

    • N/A
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 9269
      • 214
      • 0
      • 12

      #42
      Originally posted by lou cipher
      you posted a thread asking about the wbo
      prove or retract

      Comment

      • Lou Cipher
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 6901
        • 390
        • 286
        • 26,603

        #43
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
        prove or retract
        THIS thread you absolute idiot.

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #44
          Originally posted by Lou Cipher
          THIS thread you absolute idiot.
          We didn't post the thread. Is English not your first language? You don't seem to know what words mean.

          Comment

          • Dip_Slide
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 2655
            • 240
            • 11
            • 34,495

            #45
            WBO = Bob Arum

            /thread

            Comment

            • NEETzsche
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2011
              • 8389
              • 283
              • 176
              • 29,441

              #46
              The WBO should be de-recognised. Yes, some good fighters hold WBO titles, but they should be forced to fight for other belts if they want to call themselves champions

              Comment

              • TOBYLEE1
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 6824
                • 181
                • 49
                • 14,831

                #47
                Originally posted by larryxxx.
                All the belts are worthless, the champion defines the belt with whom he fights
                This right here. Too many belts and champions, the belts have lost their meaning

                Comment

                • john l
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 5639
                  • 124
                  • 190
                  • 54,474

                  #48
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  Ring magazine title is completely meaningless. Oscar De La Hoya bought the magazine and changed all the rules, and started making up rules as he went along, to benefit HBO whenever possible and to harm SHO whenever possible.

                  Nobody in the industry takes the magazine belt seriously anymore. How could you? De La Hoya owns it. It's his own personal championship. It's got no credibility whatsoever and has nothing to do with lineal anymore and Ring now has selectively enforced "mandatories" so they can strip SHO fighters whenever they want.

                  Clearly boxing fans value the WBC, WBA and IBF titles, as do the boxers. Most of the greatest and most famous fights of the last 50+ years were fought for those belts.

                  Lineal titles are meaningless now. Everyone knows Joshua would destroy Fury. So what does Fury's "lineal" title mean? Nothing. Joshua is forced to face top contenders to keep his belts. Fury can do coke and never fight and stay champ. Ludicrous.
                  have not seen bias in their rankings yet that may change now that he fired 2nd editor since he bought it.dougie (the hater)fisher is running show.

                  Comment

                  • R_Walken
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 5932
                    • 340
                    • 789
                    • 57,069

                    #49
                    Originally posted by john l
                    please don't bring up IBO that's the last thing we need a 5th
                    I agree and always thought of the IBO as the red headed step child of the belts but all I'm saying is look at their 4 recognizable Champs

                    Joshua
                    Golovkin
                    Eubank
                    Lara

                    Lara, AJ , Gennady are clearly the #1 in their division and if Eubank wins the WBSS then he's no lower then #2 . All those division are relatively deep

                    Now look at the best WBO strap holders Crawford was #1 but has probably vacated , Loma ( weak division ), Usyk, Cotto ( who was completely undeserving of that title)
                    And more often then not their Belt holder is the weakest in their division

                    How can you not think the WBO and IBo are approaching the same level of importance or lack thereof ?

                    Comment

                    • john l
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2017
                      • 5639
                      • 124
                      • 190
                      • 54,474

                      #50
                      Originally posted by R_Walken
                      I agree and always thought of the IBO as the red headed step child of the belts but all I'm saying is look at their 4 recognizable Champs

                      Joshua
                      Golovkin
                      Eubank
                      Lara

                      Lara, AJ , Gennady are clearly the #1 in their division and if Eubank wins the WBSS then he's no lower then #2 . All those division are relatively deep

                      Now look at the best WBO strap holders Crawford was #1 but has probably vacated , Loma ( weak division ), Usyk, Cotto ( who was completely undeserving of that title)
                      And more often then not their Belt holder is the weakest in their division

                      How can you not think the WBO and IBo are approaching the same level of importance or lack thereof ?
                      I just disregard IBO I'm not sayin their better I'm just stopping at 4 lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP