Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.-------- DOCTORS OFFICE VISITS, so you need to stop making SHlT UP junkienow answer the questions junkie

This is very simple. Show us what WADA rule was broken. Post it up for us to see.

[koolkc107]

IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.-------- DOCTORS OFFICE VISITS, so you need to stop making SHlT UP junkienow answer the questions junkie

FAIL


You are the one making shyt up.

Here's the WADA code on retroactive TUEs:

9. WHAT IS A RETROACTIVE TUE?

There are situations for which TUEs may be granted retroactively. The evaluation process is identical to the standard TUE application procedure i.e. the TUEC evaluates the application and issues its decision. The ISTUE stipulates which situations may result in the granting of a retroactive TUE, as follows:

Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary*; or

Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the athlete to submit, or the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

Applicable rules required the athlete or permitted the athlete to apply for a retroactive TUE. This is applicable to Persons who are not International-Level or National-Level athletes (Code Article 4.4.5) and (where the relevant NADO so chooses) to National-Level Athletes in sports specified by the relevant NADO (ISTUE Article 5.1 Comment); or
[Comment: Such athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out in ISTUE Article 4.1, should an application for a retroactive TUE be necessary following Sample collection.]

It is agreed, by WADA and by the ADO to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.

*A medical emergency or acute medical situation occurs when the athlete's medical condition justifies immediate Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Method and failure to treat immediately could significantly put the athlete’s health at risk. It is always preferable to address a TUE application prospectively rather than retrospectively. ADOs granting TUEs should have internal procedures to expedite the evaluation and granting of TUE for emergency situations, whenever possible, and without putting the athlete’s health at risk.

https://www.wada-ama.org/en/question...n-tue#item-734

I just need you to answer one question truthfully.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[Dosumpthin]

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.------ prohibited at ALL times without PRIOR TUE approval

You do realize that the entire WADA list of banned substances or methods are "prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval" by default?

Do you?

That's why they have a retroactive TUE process.



Pact@rds are insane.

[Shape up]

This is very simple. Show us what WADA rule was broken. Post it up for us to see.

Again, for the 20th time ******, 23.2.2, substantive change to the WADA code, gee, that was very easy wasn't it, even saying that the ones they used in the contract were the more important ones is substantive change, but we know by the contract they were omitted, you lose on every front nuffy

[Shape up]

23.2.2 The following Articles as applicable to the scope of the anti-doping activity which the anti-doping organization performs must be implemented by Signatories without substantive change (allowing for any non-substantive changes to the language in order to refer to the organization’s name, sport, section numbers, etc.):
• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - Definitions----------------------------MUST BE IMPLEMENTED

[travestyny]

Again, for the 20th time ******, 23.2.2, substantive change to the WADA code, gee, that was very easy wasn't it, even saying that the ones they used in the contract were the more important ones is substantive change, but we know by the contract they were omitted, you lose on every front nuffy

WADA said which code must be used. I proved USADA used them.

So again, what WADA rule was broken?

[travestyny]

23.2.2 The following Articles as applicable to the scope of the anti-doping activity which the anti-doping organization performs must be implemented by Signatories without substantive change (allowing for any non-substantive changes to the language in order to refer to the organization’s name, sport, section numbers, etc.):
• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - Definitions

All accounted for in the contract. You lose.

[Shape up]

All accounted for in the contract. You lose.

Rule 4 for code, rule 5 for procedural results management services ONLY within the protocol, you will have to do better

[Shape up]

Rules
4) Mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2, and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code (the code)(which can be found at https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code) shall be the substantiive ANTI DOPING RULES FOR ALL PURPOSES in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement and ANNEX Aand that such rules shall apply directly to mayweather and pacquaio who consent to be bound by these rules. international standards adopted pursuant to the code are applicable as specified in this agreement or otherwise provided in the code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. 5) mayweather and pacquaio agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a) and 21 of the United States anti doping agency protocol for Olympic and Paralympic movement testing (the "USADA PROTOCOL")(which may be found at http://www.usada.org/we-content/uplo...A_protocol.pfd) shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any RESULTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES provided hereunder. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement.

[travestyny]

Rules
4) Mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2, and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code (the code)(which can be found at https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code) shall be the substantiive ANTI DOPING RULES FOR ALL PURPOSES in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement and ANNEX Aand that such rules shall apply directly to mayweather and pacquaio who consent to be bound by these rules. international standards adopted pursuant to the code are applicable as specified in this agreement or otherwise provided in the code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. 5) mayweather and pacquaio agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a) and 21 of the United States anti doping agency protocol for Olympic and Paralympic movement testing (the "USADA PROTOCOL")(which may be found at http://www.usada.org/we-content/uplo...A_protocol.pfd) shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any RESULTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES provided hereunder. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement.

I guess you don’t see where it says procedural RULES.

YOU LOSE.