Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[Shape up]

WRONG AND ALREADY PROVEN FALSE.


It's over bltch. You got nothing.

1. Learn what retroactive means.
2. Stop ducking section 5 of the USADA Protocol.
3. Look at the contract about appeals.

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/l4Ki2obCyAQS5WhFe/*****.gif[/IMG]

You have not proven 1 thing, Have a look at rule 8 in the contract regarding TUE appeals junkie, usada has the final say, against WADA rules

[Shape up]

Rules
4) Mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2, and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code (the code)(which can be found at https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code) shall be the substantiive ANTI DOPING RULES FOR ALL PURPOSES in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement and ANNEX Aand that such rules shall apply directly to mayweather and pacquaio who consent to be bound by these rules. international standards adopted pursuant to the code are applicable as specified in this agreement or otherwise provided in the code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not not conflict with the terms of this agreement.-------so do you understand what "ALL PURPOSES" means, it doesn't mean a few purposes, it doesn't mean some purposes, it means if there is an article not included in 1-10 and 24.2 then as far as this CONTRACT is concerned, THEY DONT EXIST, that is SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE, remember now FOR ALL PURPOSES

[Shape up]

FOR ALL PURPOSES. 1 through 10 And 24.2 FOR ALL PURPOSES

[travestyny]

Rules
4) Mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2, and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code (the code)(which can be found at https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code) shall be the substantiive ANTI DOPING RULES FOR ALL PURPOSES in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement and ANNEX Aand that such rules shall apply directly to mayweather and pacquaio who consent to be bound by these rules. international standards adopted pursuant to the code are applicable as specified in this agreement or otherwise provided in the code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not not conflict with the terms of this agreement.-------so do you understand what "ALL PURPOSES" means, it doesn't mean a few purposes, it doesn't mean some purposes, it means if there is an article not included in 1-10 and 24.2 then as far as this CONTRACT is concerned, THEY DONT EXIST, that is SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE, remember now FOR ALL PURPOSES

Jesus Christ, you are dumb.

We can't explain this to you anymore. It's annoying. This is the last time.

1. What you are reading doesn't mean that the other rules don't apply. It is talking about what are the most SUBSTANTIVE rules. You chose the wrong definition for substantive to harp on, you idiot.

substantive
adjective | ˈsəbstən(t)iv, səbˈstan(t)iv |
1 having a firm basis in reality and therefore important, meaningful, or considerable: there is no substantive evidence for the efficacy of these drugs.

Those are the most important articles for Mayweather vs. Pacquiao.

Now USADA also makes it clear that they are following the WADA Code by adding in the USADA protocol AND ADDING SPECIFICALLY section 5 OF THE USADA PROTOCOL which states that all WADA Code that is required will be required ALWAYS. Point blank period. It's right in the contract.

Finally, you should go look at the contract and find where they talk about THE POSSIBILITY OF DISPUTES REGARDING THE TUE TO BE HEARD BEFORE AN ARBITRATOR!!


YOU ****ING MORON.

[koolkc107]

Ship out has to have the shortest attention span and/or worse memory of any poster I have ever seen.

He posts the WADA code and gets smacked around on that.

He jumps to the contract and gets smacked around on that.

Then, he tries to bring up USADA and gets stomped on that.

Having lost on the last, this nitwit brings up...the WADA code and here we go again.

It's pitiful.

And, he will sit there and insist folks answer his addle-brained questions when he can't even answer one simple question directly.

Ship out, answer the damned question!

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

I am not answering anything else from you until you answer this. There is more than enough in this thread for folks to see how wrong you are.

[WesternChamp]

snitches!! you hurt my feelings so im telling on you!!

[Shape up]

Jesus Christ, you are dumb.

We can't explain this to you anymore. It's annoying. This is the last time.

1. What you are reading doesn't mean that the other rules don't apply. It is talking about what are the most SUBSTANTIVE rules. You chose the wrong definition for substantive to harp on, you idiot.

substantive
adjective | ˈsəbstən(t)iv, səbˈstan(t)iv |
1 having a firm basis in reality and therefore important, meaningful, or considerable: there is no substantive evidence for the efficacy of these drugs.

Those are the most important articles for Mayweather vs. Pacquiao.

Now USADA also makes it clear that they are following the WADA Code by adding in the USADA protocol AND ADDING SPECIFICALLY section 5 OF THE USADA PROTOCOL which states that all WADA Code that is required will be required ALWAYS. Point blank period. It's right in the contract.

Finally, you should go look at the contract and find where they talk about THE POSSIBILITY OF DISPUTES REGARDING THE TUE TO BE HEARD BEFORE AN ARBITRATOR!!


YOU ****ING MORON.

That's funny, I knew you wouldn't understand, it doesn't say for the most important purposes, it doesn't say for some purposes,it says for ALL PURPOSES, which leaves the articles not mentioned for NO PURPOSES,

[Shape up]

You do realize that the entire WADA list of banned substances or methods are "prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval" by default?

Do you?

That's why they have a retroactive TUE process.



Pact@rds are insane.

Originally Posted by Shape up View Post
Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.------ prohibited at ALL times without PRIOR TUE approval--------- see your alt dumbsumption has the same problem, it doesn't say except with a TUE, it says PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES, I cannot see any conditions on that phrase nuffies, so you can try and talk your way out of these 2 statements but anyone with half a brain and no agenda WILL understand what these statements mean so, remember PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES and FOR ALL PURPOSES REMEMBER

[Shape up]

Definition of all

1 a :the whole amount, quantity, or extent of needed all the courage they had sat up all night
b :as much as possible spoke in all seriousness
2 :every member or individual component of all men will go all five children were present
3 :the whole number or sum of all the angles of a triangle are equal to two right angles

[koolkc107]

Definition of all

1 a :the whole amount, quantity, or extent of needed all the courage they had sat up all night
b :as much as possible spoke in all seriousness
2 :every member or individual component of all men will go all five children were present
3 :the whole number or sum of all the angles of a triangle are equal to two right angles

All of your questions have been answered before numerous times in this thread.

FAIL

I just need you to answer one truthfully and you seem to have a problem doing so.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?