Is GGG getting old or as he not just now had touher opponents?
Collapse
-
-
Robbie's qualifications - at least 10 comments posted and threads started per day for the past 3 years, using at least 2 different names, all shitting on Golovkin.I know who they are, which is that they are 'officials' that rank boxers OFFICIALLY.
What are their qualifications? Well, they are qualified to rank boxers OFFICIALLY for starters. You on the other hand, your ranking has no value since your personal rankings don't show up officially. When you do become an official and your ranking becomes an official ranking and they show up officially, only then am I going to accept your ranking as anything worthy.
Objective? No
Obsessed to the point of paranoia with discrediting GGG? YesComment
-
Are they or are they not the official individuals that rank the boxers OFFICIALLY? If they are, then that's all I need to know in regards to how much worth their rankings have.
The fact that their rankings are OFFICIAL, is enough evidence that they are qualified. Otherwise, how are their rankings OFFICIAL? Otherwise, why isn't the rankings of you and other individuals like you OFFICIAL?
................. You're a gift that just keeps giving.
Me - What makes them qualified.
You - They're officially official, official, officially, official.
How is that evidence they're qualified?
You haven't even said what rankings you're talking about.
You don't even know who these officially official people are.
You're looking completely ******ed and gullible right now.
Comment
-
imo thats how it is when the best fight the best...
i predicted ggg/canelo a draw fight, cause i saw how both guys strengths/weaknesses offset each other...
ain't nothin wrong with seeing what guys are truly made of...
both get my respect...Comment
-
Golovkin fans have been saying Golovkin is the best and ATG. If that was true he would have convincingly beat Canelo and Jacobs. He didn't, you don't see Jacobs or Canelo fans making the same claims.Comment
-
................. You're a gift that just keeps giving.
Me - What makes them qualified.
You - They're officially official, official, officially, official.
How is that evidence they're qualified?
You haven't even said what rankings you're talking about.
You don't even know who these officially official people are.
You're looking completely ******ed and gullible right now.

You're the one who is looking ******ed. I answered your question multiple times.
The fact that their rankings are official and shows up OFFICIALLY = evidence of them being qualified for this job.What makes them qualified.
Since their rankings are OFFICIAL.How is that evidence they're qualified?
Rankings of a specific weight division of boxing. Such as the middleweight division for example.You haven't even said what rankings you're talking about.
I know what I need to know, which is that they are qualified to rank boxers better than you or I or pretty much anybody here, who's rankings don't show up OFFICIALLY.You don't even know who these officially official people are.Comment
-
Age 35 is old for a boxer. It always has been and it always will be. It's not an excuse. It's a fact. Ward and Bradley are 33 I think and they both retired so what does that say about age 35? Brook landed some good punches because he is a good boxer with quick hands but he still got crushed before the fight was half over. Coming off the KO loss to GGG Brook landed a lot more punches on Spence and won more rounds and lasted longer than he did against GGG and yet nobody says Spence got exposed. I know GGG is bigger than Spence but that wouldn't make him any harder to hit. GGG beat Jacobs and most think he beat Canelo and they are the two best middleweights in the world next to GGG. GGG isn't as good as he was when he was 30 because no boxer is. He is slowly but surely going down hill. He is still champion and he can still beat any middleweight in the world much to the frustration of those who so badly want him to lose.Comment
-
What official rankings are you talking about specifically? Who are the people that decide these rankings? What is their experience?You're the one who is looking ******ed. I answered your question multiple times.
The fact that their rankings are official and shows up OFFICIALLY = evidence of them being qualified for this job.
Since their rankings are OFFICIAL.
Rankings of a specific weight division of boxing. Such as the middleweight division for example.
I know what I need to know, which is that they are qualified to rank boxers better than you or I or pretty much anybody here, who's rankings don't show up OFFICIALLY.
Them being officially official isn't an answer.
Comment
-
I answered all of those questions already.
Yes, it is. When someone's verdict is OFFICIAL, it means that they are more qualified to form a verdict than someone who's verdict isn't OFFICIAL.Them being officially official isn't an answer.
A judge's verdict in a court of law is more worthy as it is OFFICIAL, than someone else's verdict who's verdict isn't OFFICIAL.
I'm not sure how this is so difficult to understand.Comment
-
You haven't even said which rankings.I answered all of those questions already.
Yes, it is. When someone's verdict is OFFICIAL, it means that they are more qualified to form a verdict than someone who's verdict isn't OFFICIAL.
A judge's verdict in a court of law is more worthy as it is OFFICIAL, than someone else's verdict who's verdict isn't OFFICIAL.
I'm not sure how this is so difficult to understand.
WHICH BOXING RANKINGS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
If you can't answer that question. Leave the forum and go back to licking windows.Comment
Comment