Is GGG getting old or as he not just now had touher opponents?

[Robbie Barrett]

Yes, however those 'humans' are in better authority to rank boxers than you or I. As in, they are more qualified for that job than you or I are. Otherwise, if your decision / judgement were to hold any real worth / value, then you'd be one of those 'humans' to be OFFICIALLY ranking those boxers. Since you aren't, ergo, your personal opinions holds no value to me. Official rankings > rankings made by unqualified individuals like you.

What are their qualifications? Do you even know who they are?

[Robbie Barrett]

So everybody's opinion is subjective - except yours, which should be accepted by everybody as the objective truth about GGG, his opponents and his career.

Is that what you are saying?

No that's what the Gangstaz guy is saying. Everyone elses is subjective but not the people that rank fighters.

[GhostofDempsey]

Combination of the two. Four hundred career fights will take a toll on a fighter's body way faster than a few years of cherry-picking and only fighting twice per year. At 35 he backed up a younger, prime opponent and was robbed of a win.

[Mammoth]

Canelo without a doubt won rounds 1,2,3,8,10,12. I would sit down with Ledderman, Lampley, and Atlas in a public setting with video and no commentary and have them explain to everyone what they're seeing in regards to punches being landed. Because that is the only thing that matters during a boxing match. You don't get points for coming forward if you're not landing anything.

Ooooooooh shiiiitt!!!!

[Mr Objecitivity]

What are their qualifications? Do you even know who they are?

I know who they are, which is that they are 'officials' that rank boxers OFFICIALLY.

What are their qualifications? Well, they are qualified to rank boxers OFFICIALLY for starters. You on the other hand, your ranking has no value since your personal rankings don't show up officially. When you do become an official and your ranking becomes an official ranking and they show up officially, only then am I going to accept your ranking as anything worthy.

[Robbie Barrett]

I know who they are, which is that they are 'officials' that rank boxers OFFICIALLY.

What are their qualifications? Well, they are qualified to rank boxers OFFICIALLY for starters. You on the other hand, your ranking has no value since your personal rankings don't show up officially. When you do become an official and your ranking becomes an official ranking and they show up officially, only then am I going to accept your ranking as anything worthy.

This post is embarrassing.


You have no clue who they are. Or what experience they have to make them qualified. But you blindly follow them because it suits you.

At least you now acknowledge they are subjective i suppose.

[Mr Objecitivity]

Combination of the two. Four hundred career fights will take a toll on a fighter's body way faster than a few years of cherry-picking and only fighting twice per year. At 35 he backed up a younger, prime opponent and was robbed of a win.

This pretty much! I totally agree!

[WesternChamp]

both... he's getting up there in age and is now starting to fight tough opponents so it will show.

[Graz]

Combination of the two. Four hundred career fights will take a toll on a fighter's body way faster than a few years of cherry-picking and only fighting twice per year. At 35 he backed up a younger, prime opponent and was robbed of a win.

Its true. Everyone was talking about an aging Golovkin but its the young lion who gassed out under his pressure. Hopefully in May, 2018 they'll rematch and the judges will see a clear win from either side. I think Golovkin has Canelo's number, i.e. lack of stamina, and he will capitalize on it right from the opening round.

[Mr Objecitivity]

This post is embarrassing.


You have no clue who they are. Or what experience they have to make them qualified. But you blindly follow them because it suits you.

Are they or are they not the official individuals that rank the boxers OFFICIALLY? If they are, then that's all I need to know in regards to how much worth their rankings have.

The fact that their rankings are OFFICIAL, is enough evidence that they are qualified. Otherwise, how are their rankings OFFICIAL? Otherwise, why isn't the rankings of you and other individuals like you OFFICIAL?