Is GGG getting old or as he not just now had touher opponents?

[Robbie Barrett]

ju serious bro? take jacobs out because i know he aint got no fans LOL but to say canelo fans is not hyping him up as an ATG?

No they aren't apart from 1 or 2 obviously trolling none are claiming he's an ATG. The most i've seen is them saying he had the potential.

[Mr Objecitivity]

So the org rankings.

The most corrupt and least credible rankings of all.



How can you accept them all when they all don't agree?

In fact nevermind. You've already exposed yourself as ******ed.

They don't have to all agree. Unless you're going to tell me your ranking, or an ordinary boxing fan's ranking holds more worth / value. Or are you going to state that your ranking is less 'corrupted'? Do so and make yourself look ******ed.

The most corrupt and least credible rankings of all.

That is your opinion and matters very little, since those rankings are OFFICIAL (verdicts formed by individuals in higher authority than any of us who's rankings aren't official). Thus, those rankings are more 'credible' and less 'corrupt' than unofficial rankings.

How can you accept them all when they all don't agree?

Why can I not? I can accept the rankings of each particular organisation on their verdicts in relation to the rankings. Just like how I can accept the rules of Texas when I am in Texas and the rules of California when I am in California, even if they differ. So what exactly is your point?

[BigZigga]

He's aging fast
The opponents aren't dramatically better than the ones he's dominated in the past

[Robbie Barrett]

They don't have to all agree. Unless you're going to tell me your ranking, or an ordinary boxing fan's ranking holds more worth / value. Or are you going to state that your ranking is less 'corrupted'? Do so and make yourself look ******ed.



That is your opinion and matters very little, since those rankings are OFFICIAL (verdicts formed by individuals in higher authority than any of us who's rankings aren't official). Thus, those rankings are more 'credible' and less 'corrupt' than unofficial rankings.



Why can I not? I can accept the rankings of each particular organisation on their verdicts in relation to the rankings. Just like how I can accept the rules of Texas when I am in Texas and the rules of California when I am in California, even if they differ. So what exactly is your point?

I'd take any fans rankings over the orgs. The orgs only care about making money. 99% of fans would tell you their rankings are worthless. They are corrupt. Everyone fan KNOWS this (apart from you).

How can you agree with all? One says Wilder is the best HW in the world, one says Parker is and the others say Joshua is. How they all be?

You saying the org rankings are less corrupt and more credible. Loses you all credibility. I doubt anyone on this forum would agree with you.

[Metho_4u]

Golovkin isn't as good as his fans thought, they can't swallow their pride and admit it so make excuses.

How can they with loads of his semen in there?

[Mr Objecitivity]

I'd take any fans rankings over the orgs. The orgs only care about making money. 99% of fans would tell you their rankings are worthless. They are corrupt. Everyone fan KNOWS this (apart from you).

How can you agree with all? One says Wilder is the best HW in the world, one says Parker is and the others say Joshua is. How they all be?

You saying the org rankings are less corrupt and more credible. Loses you all credibility. I doubt anyone on this forum would agree with you.

I'd take any fans rankings over the orgs. The orgs only care about making money. 99% of fans would tell you their rankings are worthless. They are corrupt. Everyone fan KNOWS this (apart from you).

So you've made a survey asking 99% of those boxing fans? Can you provide the evidence for this? Or is it just another one of your points which you've just pulled out of thin air?

Furthermore, 99% of the public can disagree with the laws of a particular country. That doesn't make their opinion any more worthy / valuable than the official law (which is the only law put into effect).

How can you agree with all? One says Wilder is the best HW in the world, one says Parker is and the others say Joshua is. How they all be?

Just like how I can accept the laws of California and Texas, even if the laws are different in both places.

You saying the org rankings are less corrupt and more credible. Loses you all credibility. I doubt anyone on this forum would agree with you.

No, it doesn't. It just makes me more objective. In the end, anyone can pull out their own arbitrary rankings. Ultimately, it's the ranking that has an effect on the sport which matters the most. Not rankings from any random person who's ranking has no effect.

[McNulty]

Since Kell Brook people were sating they saw signs of deterioration and more so after Jacobs then after Canelo


But could it simply be because he is now fighting elite world class opponents and NOT that he is losing it and is deteriorating?

Im sure if he fought some of the lower ranked MW he would take them out easily, like before

I think getting s guy to come up two classes isn't a good way to look good namsayin?

They're not just going to fold up and will tage the fùck out of you for they get blasted. Thats not a good look.

I think GGG IS getting old and he IS fighting better guys. He's been fighting trash minus Jacobs (who I think beat GGG's ass) so its easy to look good.

Line up 10 bums in front of me and in my day I would knock them down and look great doing it. Doesn't mean I'm great namsayin?

[Robbie Barrett]

So you've made a survey asking 99% of those boxing fans? Can you provide the evidence for this? Or is it just another one of your points which you've just pulled out of thin air?

Furthermore, 99% of the public can disagree with the laws of a particular country. That doesn't make their opinion any more worthy / valuable than the official law (which is the only law put into effect).



Just like how I can accept the laws of California and Texas, even if the laws are different in both places.



No, it doesn't. It just makes me more objective. In the end, anyone can pull out their own arbitrary rankings. Ultimately, it's the ranking that has an effect on the sport which matters the most. Not rankings from any random person who's ranking has no effect.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=760572

[RussB23]

Both , the guys he is fighting now are tougher but you can see a decline .

[buddyr]

but nelo got a draw so what does that say then lol. if ggg aint as good as his fans think, then canelo would have walked thru him like in the khan fight...

He aint that good either. Shut out by Mayweather. Was losing to Trout befor that bs live scoring announcement in TX that somehow had him winning so Trout was forced to stand and trade and got knocked down but I felt he still win the fight. Lost to Lara as well. I just knew GGG wasn't gonna blow thru him and I had Canelo winning the fight.