Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Mayweather-McGregor, Mosley, Ward

[aboutfkntime]

Upsets happen in boxing as in all sports.

Show me evidence that Marquez was the man at that time. Real evidence, not that edited ring/playboy rankings list. I exposed u on that one.
Who did he beat from 2000 to 2003 to prove he was "the man"?
I'll have my popcorn ready!!!!

FACT: Marquez was ranked higher than Barrera

FACT: Marquez position over Barrera was justified, because Marquez beat Barrera when they fought

FACT: Pacquiao did not win a title off Barrera

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Marquez

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Morales in 2011/2012/2013


sorry for ripping you a new a55hole with those facts

[aboutfkntime]

Morales PROVED that he was better than Pac when they fought

Morales first real super-featherweight fight happened in 2004

so while Morales was alive and kicking, and campaigning at 126..... Pacquiao should not get any " I love you Manny " awards handed to him

and Pac did not beat Marquez either, so it is impossible to hand him an imaginary title for that reason also

at 126.....
1) Marquez
2) Morales
3) Pacquiao
4) Barrera
5) Hamed

stop handing around world titles like they are jellybeans, you muppet

[aboutfkntime]

fighters either win titles in the ring, or they do not.....

any fanboy who argues that a particular fighter " should " have won a title..... is a fkn moron

[harry-greb]

FACT: Marquez was ranked higher than Barrera

FACT: Marquez position over Barrera was justified, because Marquez beat Barrera when they fought

FACT: Pacquiao did not win a title off Barrera

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Marquez

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Morales in 2011/2012/2013


sorry for ripping you a new a55hole with those facts

u and your alternative facts!! are u sure you're not kelly-anne conway???!!!
your first "fact" read below

Ring Featherweight Ratings for period ended september 15 2003
champion marco antonio barrera
1. erik morales
2. Juan Manuel Marquez
3. derrick gainer
4. manuel medina
5. Scott Harrison
6. Johnny Tapia
7. lehlo ledwaba
8. william abelyan
9. Michael Brodie
10. Rocky Juarez

notice who number 1 ranked contender is.........

lets continue the lesson

Ring Featherweight Ratings for period ended october 7 2003

champion marco antonio barrera

1. juan manuel marquez
2. derrick gainer
3. manuel medina
4. scott harrison
5. johnny tapia
6. lehlo ledwaba
7. william abelyan
8. michael brodie
9. rocky juarez
10. zahir raheem

the ring also added that erik morales had left featherweight to campaign at 130 so marquez moves up to no.1 CONTENDER

ring featherweight ratings for period ended november 6th 2003

champion marco antonio barrera

1. juan manuel marquez
2. manuel medina
3. scott harrison
4. johnny tapia
5. derrick gainer
6. injin chi
7. michael brodie
8. william abelyan
9. rocky juarez
10. zahir raheem

pacquiao beats barrera on november 15th 2003, thus becoming lineal featherweight champion.
are u still with me??

ring featherweight rankings for period ended december 3rd 2003
these are the year end rankings that take into account the barrera - pacquiao fight. they're also the rankings that u have edited and posted

champion manny pacquiao

1. juan manuel marquez
2. marco antonio barrera
3. scott harrison
4. manuel medina
5. johnny tapia
6. derrick gainer
7. injin chi
8. michael brodie
9. william abelyan
10. rocky juarez

marquez was always ranked below barrera in those rankings apart from the last one following on from barrera's defeat to pacquiao. he was even ranked below morales before morales left featherweight. so at no time was marquez"the man". he was no. 2 contender, no. 1 contender and he fought the lineal champ to a draw.

and i repeat, not even for 1 day were pacquiao and morales at featherweight at the same time.

CASE CLOSED

[harry-greb]

Morales PROVED that he was better than Pac when they fought

Morales first real super-featherweight fight happened in 2004

so while Morales was alive and kicking, and campaigning at 126..... Pacquiao should not get any " I love you Manny " awards handed to him

and Pac did not beat Marquez either, so it is impossible to hand him an imaginary title for that reason also

at 126.....
1) Marquez
2) Morales
3) Pacquiao
4) Barrera
5) Hamed

stop handing around world titles like they are jellybeans, you muppet

how the **** did morales prove he was better than pacquiao when he was 1-2 against him????????????? this popcorn tastes gooooooooood!!!

morales' first "real" super-featherweight fight happened in 2004 as opposed to his first ACTUAL super- featherweight fight which happened on october 4th 2003!!! boxrec son, boxrec.

calendars and dates are causing u problems. morales left featherweight in OCTOBER 2003. pacquiao arrived at featherweight in NOVEMBER 2003. i'll wait til u work that one out!!
and those top 5 rankings u posted are your opinion. havent we talked about facts and opinions??

[harry-greb]

fighters either win titles in the ring, or they do not.....

any fanboy who argues that a particular fighter " should " have won a title..... is a fkn moron

couldn't agree more. pacquiao beat barrera who beat hamed who was undoubtedly the man in the division. marquez's opponents dont compare to hameds and u know it!!!

u argue that marquez was the man despite him beating nobodies at the time. hamed barrera and pacquiao all beat better fighters than anyone marquez beat at that time.

indisputable facts

[aboutfkntime]

u and your alternative facts!! are u sure you're not kelly-anne conway???!!!
your first "fact" read below

Ring Featherweight Ratings for period ended september 15 2003
champion marco antonio barrera
1. erik morales
2. Juan Manuel Marquez
3. derrick gainer
4. manuel medina
5. Scott Harrison
6. Johnny Tapia
7. lehlo ledwaba
8. william abelyan
9. Michael Brodie
10. Rocky Juarez

notice who number 1 ranked contender is.........

lets continue the lesson

Ring Featherweight Ratings for period ended october 7 2003

champion marco antonio barrera

1. juan manuel marquez
2. derrick gainer
3. manuel medina
4. scott harrison
5. johnny tapia
6. lehlo ledwaba
7. william abelyan
8. michael brodie
9. rocky juarez
10. zahir raheem

the ring also added that erik morales had left featherweight to campaign at 130 so marquez moves up to no.1 CONTENDER

ring featherweight ratings for period ended november 6th 2003

champion marco antonio barrera

1. juan manuel marquez
2. manuel medina
3. scott harrison
4. johnny tapia
5. derrick gainer
6. injin chi
7. michael brodie
8. william abelyan
9. rocky juarez
10. zahir raheem

pacquiao beats barrera on november 15th 2003, thus becoming lineal featherweight champion.
are u still with me??

ring featherweight rankings for period ended december 3rd 2003
these are the year end rankings that take into account the barrera - pacquiao fight. they're also the rankings that u have edited and posted

champion manny pacquiao

1. juan manuel marquez
2. marco antonio barrera
3. scott harrison
4. manuel medina
5. johnny tapia
6. derrick gainer
7. injin chi
8. michael brodie
9. william abelyan
10. rocky juarez

marquez was always ranked below barrera in those rankings apart from the last one following on from barrera's defeat to pacquiao. he was even ranked below morales before morales left featherweight. so at no time was marquez"the man". he was no. 2 contender, no. 1 contender and he fought the lineal champ to a draw.

and i repeat, not even for 1 day were pacquiao and morales at featherweight at the same time.

CASE CLOSED

FACT: Pacquiao did not win a title off Barrera

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Marquez

FACT: Marquez was ranked higher than Barrera

FACT: Marquez position over Barrera was justified, because Marquez beat Barrera when they fought

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Morales in 2011/2012/2013




is it really easier for you to attempt to convince the world that Pacquiao should be awarded a "I love you Manny" title..... than it was for Pac to beat Marquez and Morales?

oh right, it is..... HAHAHAHAH carry on LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

how the **** did morales prove he was better than pacquiao when he was 1-2 against him????????????? this popcorn tastes gooooooooood!!!

morales' first "real" super-featherweight fight happened in 2004 as opposed to his first ACTUAL super- featherweight fight which happened on october 4th 2003!!! boxrec son, boxrec.

calendars and dates are causing u problems. morales left featherweight in OCTOBER 2003. pacquiao arrived at featherweight in NOVEMBER 2003. i'll wait til u work that one out!!
and those top 5 rankings u posted are your opinion. havent we talked about facts and opinions??

you know something.....

if my guy could not beat Marquez..... and if my guy lost to the best version of Morales that he faced..... I would be too embarrassed to run around desperately pleading that the world should award him an imaginary "I love you Manny" title

Morales was better at 122/126 than super-featherweight

have some pride, Pac doesn't even know you exist

just saying.....

[aboutfkntime]

Marquez > Hamed

couldn't agree more. pacquiao beat barrera who beat hamed who was undoubtedly the man in the division. marquez's opponents dont compare to hameds and u know it!!!

u argue that marquez was the man despite him beating nobodies at the time. hamed barrera and pacquiao all beat better fighters than anyone marquez beat at that time.

indisputable facts

FACT: Hamed ducked Marquez like he had the plague

FACT: Marquez beat Barrera


I truly believe that this video will make you cry.....

[harry-greb]

FACT: Pacquiao did not win a title off Barrera

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Marquez

FACT: Marquez was ranked higher than Barrera

FACT: Marquez position over Barrera was justified, because Marquez beat Barrera when they fought

FACT: Pacquiao did not beat Morales in 2011/2012/2013




is it really easier for you to attempt to convince the world that Pacquiao should be awarded a "I love you Manny" title..... than it was for Pac to beat Marquez and Morales?

oh right, it is..... HAHAHAHAH carry on LMAO

When cold hard facts(rankings) are staring u in the face and u refuse to accept them, there is nothing else to say.