Contrary to ****** Logic GGG is the one with more experience than Canelo

[Metho_4u]

GGG has the better resume. If you analyze their best wins ggg wins are better. Jacobs and lemieux would be the favorite over canelo's best wins. Lara, trout, and cotto. Lemeuix and jacobs would put all of canelo's best wins in a body bag. But that's besides the point. GGG's vast amateur experience will play a huge role in this fight.

Your logic is off...at 160 the favorites might be different, but canelo was fighting them at 154. Jacobs was an 8-1 underdog, and no idea what lemieux was, but the facts are golovkins resume is loaded with C and C+ fighters with Jacobs the only B level, but had already lost and been stopped in that loss.

[satiev1]

Stop hyping up Jacobs and (especially) Lemieux, who is just a crude puncher comparable to Kirkland who Nelo wrecked in 3. Jacobs is overhyped as well, not in Cotto or Lara's league.

Did you just compare lemieux to kirkland who got stopped in 1 rd by ishida one of ggg's worst opponents? Stop posting right now and leave this forum for good.

[satiev1]

Your logic is off...at 160 the favorites might be different, but canelo was fighting them at 154. Jacobs was an 8-1 underdog, and no idea what lemieux was, but the facts are golovkins resume is loaded with C and C+ fighters with Jacobs the only B level, but had already lost and been stopped in that loss.

Fight is at 160. No one cares about hypothetical scenarios if they were the same size. 160 is all that matters since the fight is at 160.

[kafkod]

The topic of YOUR thread is experience. Fantasy matchups between their opponents being determined by size doesn't equal experience

But Golovkin has experience fighting and beating top ranked MWs, at 160lbs, and Canelo hasn't. That's what he's saying.

[DinoCop]

The guys who fought Canelo ducked GGG just like Canelo did.
Honestly, what do you think would happen in GGG vs Cotto, Trout, Lara. Had GGG caught them on the ropes like Canelo did, they would be dropped.
What about Canelo vs Lemieux, Jacobs, Monroe, MM ?

[Metho_4u]

Fight is at 160. No one cares about hypothetical scenarios if they were the same size. 160 is all that matters since the fight is at 160.

No, you said you didn't think that canelos best wins couldn't beat lemieux etc, but his best wins were at 154, so it's reality, it's not hypothetical at all...and if you don't think Lara could make lemieux look totally ******, then you yourself are a moron.

[Larry the boss]

Canelo has fought on a higher lever on the pro level..not sure why ya'll keep mentioning this amateur ****

[satiev1]

No, you said you didn't think that canelos best wins couldn't beat lemieux etc, but his best wins were at 154, so it's reality, it's not hypothetical at all...and if you don't think Lara could make lemieux look totally ******, then you yourself are a moron.

They couldn't beat lemieux and jacobs at 160 you dumb FU-CK. They would be the underdog. Therefore canelo's wins at 154 are irrelevant because he's not fighting at 160. And you are mentally confused with the topic at hand.

[Metho_4u]

They couldn't beat lemieux and jacobs at 160 you dumb FU-CK. They would be the underdog. Therefore canelo's wins at 154 are irrelevant because he's not fighting at 160. And you are mentally confused with the topic at hand.

Dude...lemieux ****ing sucks...why you think he could beat a solid pure boxer is beyond me...you're just ****ing plain ******

[satiev1]

Canelo has fought on a higher lever on the pro level..not sure why ya'll keep mentioning this amateur ****

This is not true. Their opposition is very similar on the pro stage and they have almost equal amount of fights. The ice breaker here is that while canelo was facing bums and cab drivers from mexico as a teen, ggg was facing the best in the world in the amateurs. Those extra 350 fights put the experience in ggg's hands.