Contrary to ****** Logic GGG is the one with more experience than Canelo

[Outwest Exp 355]

Canelo has 0 big fight experience against mws.

So what he's a professional. Experience will not come into play in this fight. This isn't no step up fight for either guy.

[Rudyo]

He does have more big fight experience but he also struggles in big fights. Both will be prepared so experience won't be a factor.

Struggled in one big fight, versus the #1 P4P fighter of the last decade... Canelo has been in big fights since the Mayweather fight and is undefeated in those fights.

[Real King Kong]

So what he's a professional. Experience will not come into play in this fight. This isn't no step up fight for either guy.

I tend to agree...if canelo is actually a mw like everyone says he is, he should be able to deal with ggg's strength and power. The clearest advantage in this fight may be canelo's youth...ggg has already shown slippage and every fight from here on out could be the fight where he shows his age.

[BoxingIsGreat]

GGG has the better resume. If you analyze their best wins ggg wins are better. Jacobs and lemieux would be the favorite over canelo's best wins. Lara, trout, and cotto. Lemeuix and jacobs would put all of canelo's best wins in a body bag. But that's besides the point. GGG's vast amateur experience will play a huge role in this fight.

I stopped here.

[Holystroke3]

Saying "Jacobs and Lemieux would beat Cotto, Trout, and Lara" over and over is really pointless. They both have big size advantages, neither are better fighters than those three (though I wouldn't argue Jacobs over Trout)

Canelo is more experienced in big fights, though I don't think that's a factor in this fight

[satiev1]

Saying "Jacobs and Lemieux would beat Cotto, Trout, and Lara" over and over is really pointless. They both have big size advantages, neither are better fighters than those three (though I wouldn't argue Jacobs over Trout)

Canelo is more experienced in big fights, though I don't think that's a factor in this fight

What's pointless is you ignoring the size. It dosen't matter if they're bigger. At the end of the day they will win. We are comparing resumes and opposition. Size plays a role when moving up to mw. It's relevant when two guys step in the ring.

[satiev1]

Struggled in one big fight, versus the #1 P4P fighter of the last decade... Canelo has been in big fights since the Mayweather fight and is undefeated in those fights.

What big fights?

[Outwest Exp 355]

I tend to agree...if canelo is actually a mw like everyone says he is, he should be able to deal with ggg's strength and power. The clearest advantage in this fight may be canelo's youth...ggg has already shown slippage and every fight from here on out could be the fight where he shows his age.

Canelo's got a lot going for him. Most of all he's the better fighter and I expect him to win convincingly.

[satiev1]

Bottom line is that both ggg and canelo have fought tomato cans in their pro career. Their resumes are very similar. Canelo's best wins do not beat ggg's best wins. All thing being equal in their pro career the ice breaker here is the amateur experience. GGG has 350 while canelo has zero. GGG experience by far is greater not even close. Anyone who claims amateur experience dosen't matter dosen't know much about boxing.

[Holystroke3]

What's pointless is you ignoring the size. Size plays a role when moving up to mw. It's relevant when two guys step in the ring.

The topic of YOUR thread is experience. Fantasy matchups between their opponents being determined by size doesn't equal experience