GGGgets crticized for having a bad resume. Why doesnt the same happen to Crawford?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyBoxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7454
    • 488
    • 62
    • 50,228

    #31
    Originally posted by Dbt
    Add Lemieux to that list. He lost his IBF title to Golovkin
    So that's 8 world champions beaten, 6 as a pro.

    Not that bad.

    5 posts, are you a Maxi alts? Lol

    Comment

    • Dbt
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2017
      • 143
      • 12
      • 24
      • 6,673

      #32
      Originally posted by BillyBoxing
      So that's 8 world champions beaten, 6 as a pro.

      Not that bad.

      5 posts, are you a Maxi alts? Lol
      Nope, long time reader of the forum. I don't really post too often as there's too many agenda driven posters on here.

      Comment

      • GhostofDempsey
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2017
        • 31801
        • 13,186
        • 8,716
        • 493,602

        #33
        Originally posted by Eff Pandas
        There's people that can complain about anyone's resume. Whoever you think has the best resume in boxing they can dog that mfers resume like it was dogsh^t.
        This about sums it up. I've actually seen casuals on here who shyt all over the resumes of Robinson, Greb, Moore, Hagler, Duran, Leonard, Chavez Sr., De La Hoya, and more.

        Granted there is such a thing as hype and resumes being suspect, but I wonder who any of these "fans" can actually ever enjoy a fight when they are so busy dicing up resumes, opponents, and dismissing all of their accomplishments.

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #34
          Originally posted by BillyBoxing
          That's maybe because Crawford hasn't been an outstanding amateur on the international scene and turned pro younger right?

          Golovkin moved up in ams:

          2000 Light Welterweight Gold Medalist at the World Junior Championships in Budapest
          2001 Welterweight Gold Medalist at the East Asian Games in Osaka, Japan.

          2002 Light Middleweight Gold Medalist at the Asian
          2003 Middleweight Gold Medalist at the World Championships in ****kok

          You should know that Larry since you're geeking boxing.
          Crawford moved up at the age of 27..GGG turned pro at 25 right?? so how does your post make any sense?? and now people want Crawford to move up yet again...Crawford has been pro for 9 years same amount of time GGG has been pro...SO???????

          Comment

          • Hype job
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2014
            • 10667
            • 728
            • 1,404
            • 43,949

            #35
            It's da pigmentz.

            Comment

            • Hype job
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2014
              • 10667
              • 728
              • 1,404
              • 43,949

              #36
              Originally posted by -MEGA-
              I don't know...ahhh....maybe because Crawford has actually moved up in weight to get fights.
              You mean he outgrew the weight. 'Moved up' smh.

              Comment

              • Hype job
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2014
                • 10667
                • 728
                • 1,404
                • 43,949

                #37
                Originally posted by larryxxx.
                Crawford moved up at the age of 27..GGG turned pro at 25 right?? so how does your post make any sense?? and now people want Crawford to move up yet again...Crawford has been pro for 9 years same amount of time GGG has been pro...SO???????
                Crawford didn't move up shit, he outgrew that division. He's a natural welterweight if anything.

                Comment

                • Pigeons
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 14750
                  • 1,211
                  • 714
                  • 37,430

                  #38
                  Originally posted by BillyBoxing
                  Yet in a boxing ring (as a pro and amateur), GGG beat Jacobs, Brook, Ouma, Geale, Bute, Lee, Direll wich means 7 world champions.

                  How many Bud has beaten?

                  You guys need to stop that GGG bashing and looks at his whole respectable career.
                  You Golovkin clowns are pitiful with that amateur bull****. As if 4 rounds in headgear somehow applies to the pros. While you're at it I guess you have to add Danny Garcia and Mikey Garcia's scalps to Crawford's list since he beat them in the amateurs.

                  Comment

                  • BillyBoxing
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 7454
                    • 488
                    • 62
                    • 50,228

                    #39
                    Originally posted by larryxxx.
                    Crawford moved up at the age of 27..GGG turned pro at 25 right?? so how does your post make any sense?? and now people want Crawford to move up yet again...Crawford has been pro for 9 years same amount of time GGG has been pro...SO???????
                    So you wanted GGG to move up like Crawford at the age of 27 when he was facing beginners in Germany?

                    The point is simple Larry but you're VOLUNTARY MISSING IT, GGG has already moved up 30 pounds during his 20s as a top athlete and is not going to outgrew a division in his 30s like Crawford did.

                    I'm not saying that he doesn't have to move up, I'm just saying it's not pointless for him to stay at 160.

                    In terms of pure boxing, I would rather see him staying at 160 facing Nelo, rematching DJ, facing Charlo than moving up and doing a brit tour facing Groves and De Gale.

                    Moving up is cool but the quality of the opponents too.

                    Exemple: Broner is a 4 divisions champion but never has been A fighter in any of those 4 divisions, Ponce kicked his ass at 130.

                    Comment

                    • BillyBoxing
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 7454
                      • 488
                      • 62
                      • 50,228

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Pigeons
                      You Golovkin clowns are pitiful with that amateur bull****. As if 4 rounds in headgear somehow applies to the pros. While you're at it I guess you have to add Danny Garcia and Mikey Garcia's scalps to Crawford's list since he beat them in the amateurs.
                      There is no bullsht in ams buddy.

                      And Oscar, Floyd (robbed), Roy, Lewis, Klit, Ward, Lomo, Rigo have been olympic champion for a reason.

                      Depending if those wins happens in olympic games or top competition or in some Sylver gloves bullsht kid tournaments when dudes are 15 years old.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP