How good is Andre Ward in an all time sense?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • McNulty
    Hamsterdam
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 6576
    • 430
    • 348
    • 28,319

    #121
    Originally posted by Kigali
    Not good at all in the ATG sense.

    He goes to sleep if he fights Stevenson.
    Adonis????

    Comment

    • iamboxing
      ******a facking game
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 6421
      • 672
      • 760
      • 29,458

      #122
      Originally posted by joseph5620
      He's up there whether people like it or not. I think when he retires more people will see him as an all time great.
      Actually, it's up to the people whether he's an ATG. Boxing snobs can wax lyrical about his technical prowess, but if no one remembers him or his fights after he retires he becomes consigned to the dustbin of history along with Mayweather. No one remembers nor cares about boring boxers.

      That's why Mayweather is desperately trying to salvage his legacy by trying to be exciting, but like most of his fights....all hype, no pay off. In 20 years time they'll still be talking about Ali, Tyson, Robinson, Marciano, SRL, Duran, Hearns, RJJ, Hamed, Barrera, Morales, JCC, Foreman, Frazier - they'll even remember journeymen like Ward. These are the fighters that captured the interest of viewers, not Mayweather and Ward - utterly forgettable.

      Comment

      • BillyBoxing
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 7454
        • 488
        • 62
        • 50,228

        #123
        Originally posted by McNulty
        Adonis????
        I think he meant Teofilo Stevenson

        Comment

        • BillyBoxing
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 7454
          • 488
          • 62
          • 50,228

          #124
          Originally posted by joseph5620
          You're one of the idiots that said Ward would avoid Kovalev Then you said Kovalev would knock Ward out. Now Kovalev is a bum to you. I love to expose idiots like you who routinely do this.

          Kessler was so past prime that he was favored to beat Ward and win the super 6. Again you're exposing your idiocy, lack of boxing knowledge lies, and your contradictions.


          Camacho better win for Delahoya than Kessler Froch, and Kovalev?
          That's the thing I dislike with you, that's very frustrating.
          You put in people mouth words they didn't say.

          1.When I said Ward will avoid Kovalev?
          Ward is a warrior, so was Oscar.
          I'm none of those guys who call fighters ducks.
          WHEN??Please WHEN?


          2.Same thing, I said Pernell, Chavez, Camacho are better wins than Kessler, Kova, Froch.

          I compared their 3 best wins/records.

          You manipulating my words when you willingly remove Pernell and Julio from the sentence.

          I wish we could have serious boxing talk but won't happen without a "fair trade" dude.

          Kova is not a bum, I was trash talking, so aren't Froch and Kessler.

          But they are one dimensionnal fighters despite being good at what they do.

          So Ward look like the complete package next to these guys.

          But would he next to guys like Floyd or Pernell where Oscar showed some limits?

          Oscar at 135 woulda destroyed a guy of Kova's skill level/caliber , woudn't need 2 fights.

          Oscar was a complete beast from 130 to 140, started to have limited power at 147.

          Comment

          • BillyBoxing
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 7454
            • 488
            • 62
            • 50,228

            #125
            Originally posted by KingHippo
            I'm not talking about who should be ranked higher in the boxing pantheon, I'm talking about pure skill.

            DelaHoya has been in iconic fights, but how we rate these fighters has a lot to do with nostalgia. For instance, I always thought Trinidad was a garbage fighter.

            1.The reason why DelaHoya ranks higher is because of the fights he's been in. Ward can't help the fact that he was born in the wrong era. Pound for pound, I think a fighter like Ward would completely embarrass someone of Trinidad's caliber. 2.We all saw what happened when he fought someone of comparable skill in Hopkins. The guy just had a very low iq and wasn't adaptable. I also remember the Winky Wright fight. I don't think I remember seeing him throw one single straight right in that fight, and that's a big problem. The guy was just grossly overrated in my opinion. Ward would've completely dominated that era.
            1.Nah, C'mon bro, Oscar won titles in 6 divisions, his accomplishment are way betters.

            He won himself a gold medal, started at 130 beat solid prime champions like G.Hernandez, John John Molina, MA Gonzalez, Ruelas, Paez he not only beat them but destroyed them.

            Then old but still game Pernell, Chavez (they were still world champion and he took their title), Quarety who was a beast at 147, Vargas at 154, Sturm at 160 (bad decision just as his decision loss to Trinidad).

            Not comparable to wins over Kessler, Froch, Abraham and Kova in 2 divisions.

            2.Yet Ward struggled skillwise with Kovalov who isn't better IMO than Trinidad.
            And Kova was bigger, that's what happens when you move up.


            You guys telling me Trinidad looked like **** next to Hop, same for Oscar.
            But Oscar was a fckin superFW, Trinidad a WW.

            I mean, size matters in boxing.

            Comment

            • Sp0rty Cr@ig
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Oct 2011
              • 728
              • 34
              • 23
              • 7,187

              #126
              Originally posted by iamboxing
              Actually, it's up to the people whether he's an ATG. Boxing snobs can wax lyrical about his technical prowess, but if no one remembers him or his fights after he retires he becomes consigned to the dustbin of history along with Mayweather. No one remembers nor cares about boring boxers.

              That's why Mayweather is desperately trying to salvage his legacy by trying to be exciting, but like most of his fights....all hype, no pay off. In 20 years time they'll still be talking about Ali, Tyson, Robinson, Marciano, SRL, Duran, Hearns, RJJ, Hamed, Barrera, Morales, JCC, Foreman, Frazier - they'll even remember journeymen like Ward. These are the fighters that captured the interest of viewers, not Mayweather and Ward - utterly forgettable.
              Explain how Mayweather has PPV records when he wasn't able to capture the interest of viewers..

              Also search Mayweather fights on Youtube and they got plenty of views.

              Obviously none of his fights match Pac-JMM, Hagler-Hearns, Ali-Foreman etc but he definately captured the interest of viewers.

              Ward on the other hand has been PPV level since the super 6 yet only hardcore boxing fans know about him. Huge Difference. You are just a hater

              Comment

              • TheBigLug
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2017
                • 4047
                • 186
                • 0
                • 19,042

                #127
                calling him an ATG is a bit strong but then i suppose you only get that status when you reflect on a guys career later on.

                Calzaghe was better though.

                Comment

                • RomanReigns
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2016
                  • 2975
                  • 243
                  • 361
                  • 49,773

                  #128
                  If he beats Stevenson, and wins a title at Cruiserweight.

                  Comment

                  • soul_survivor
                    LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2013
                    • 18949
                    • 623
                    • 473
                    • 65,236

                    #129
                    Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
                    Safe to call him a HOFer at this point



                    Wait I'm confused, I thought that would satisfy the criteria for being in the top 500?
                    That's clearly not what I said in my post is it?

                    Comment

                    • soul_survivor
                      LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 18949
                      • 623
                      • 473
                      • 65,236

                      #130
                      Originally posted by TheBigLug
                      calling him an ATG is a bit strong but then i suppose you only get that status when you reflect on a guys career later on.

                      Calzaghe was better though.
                      Not true in the case of the best boxers in history. By the end of the 70s Dura nwas already being talked about as one of the greatest ever, Ali by the time of his exile was already regarded as the greatest heavyweight champion ever (by most), Robinson long before his 160 run was regarded as possibly the best to ever do it, Leonard by the time of his first retirement was alreday regarded as an ATG and so on and so forth.

                      Looking back at Ward's career will only dampen the hype he is receiving now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP