Do you think Bob Arum was aware of Pacquiaos PED abuse?

[D4thincarnation]

I answered that yesterday I believe.

Only the medical personnel and USADA know that. There's none on this forum to answer, so it's a ****** question.

So, you don't know.

Do you know what the banned IV shot was meant to do?

[D4thincarnation]

In early March, USADA presented the Pacquiao camp with a
contract
that allowed the testing agency to grant a retroactive the****utic
use exemption (TUE) to either fighter in the event that the fighter
tested positive for a prohibited drug. That retroactive exemption
could have been granted without notifying the
Nevada State Athletic
Commission or the opposing fighter’s camp

I wonder why USADA offered this up. Paving the way for Floyd to take banned substances claiming a retroactive TUE, which he did do.

[Robbie Barrett]

I wonder why USADA offered this up. Paving the way for Floyd to take banned substances claiming a retroactive TUE, which he did do.

That's the standard contract. Retroactive TUE's are a requirement under WADA rules.

Here ****** go read the reply to Hausers article. Maybe you can stop embarrassing yourself then.

https://www.usada.org/wp-content/uploads/USADAs-Detailed-Correction-to-SB-Nation-Article-by-Tom-Hauser.pdf

[D4thincarnation]

That's the standard contract. Retroactive TUE's are a requirement under WADA rules.

Here ****** go read the reply to Hausers article. Maybe you can stop embarrassing yourself then.

https://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...Tom-Hauser.pdf

Yes taking banned drugs seem to be required by USADA.

No wonder Floyd wanted to use them

[Robbie Barrett]

Yes taking banned drugs seem to be required by USADA.

No wonder Floyd wanted to use them

Banned drugs? Saline and vitamins aren't banned or drugs. Soooooooo DUMB.

You were saying NSAC were the corrupt ones yesterday and not USADA. Flip flop little ******.

[Robbie Barrett]

Yes taking banned drugs seem to be required by USADA.

No wonder Floyd wanted to use them

You have shown clearly in this thread you know nothing. That makes your opinion worthless.

[D4thincarnation]

That's the standard contract. Retroactive TUE's are a requirement under WADA rules.

Here ****** go read the reply to Hausers article. Maybe you can stop embarrassing yourself then.

https://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...Tom-Hauser.pdf

9. What is a retroactive TUE?
Up

There are situations for which TUEs may be granted retroactively. The evaluation process is identical to the standard TUE application procedure i.e. the TUEC evaluates the application and issues its decision. The ISTUE stipulates which situations may result in the granting of a retroactive TUE, as follows:

Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary*; or
Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the athlete to submit, or the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or
Applicable rules required the athlete or permitted the athlete to apply for a retroactive TUE. This is applicable to Persons who are not International-Level or National-Level athletes (Code Article 4.4.5) and (where the relevant NADO so chooses) to National-Level Athletes in sports specified by the relevant NADO (ISTUE Article 5.1 Comment); or
[Comment: Such athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out in ISTUE Article 4.1, should an application for a retroactive TUE be necessary following Sample collection.]
It is agreed, by WADA and by the ADO to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.

*A medical emergency or acute medical situation occurs when the athlete's medical condition justifies immediate Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Method and failure to treat immediately could significantly put the athlete’s health at risk. It is always preferable to address a TUE application prospectively rather than retrospectively. ADOs granting TUEs should have internal procedures to expedite the evaluation and granting of TUE for emergency situations, whenever possible, and without putting the athlete’s health at risk.



So what was this medical emergency that Floyd had?

Has he ever suffered from this after any other weigh in?

Why is it being kept secret to what issues he had?

Why is USADA not being transparent with allowing an athlete to take a banned substance?

[D4thincarnation]

Banned drugs? Saline and vitamins aren't banned or drugs. Soooooooo DUMB.

You were saying NSAC were the corrupt ones yesterday and not USADA. Flip flop little ******.

Both on Floyd's payroll.

VADA isn't and has been proved to be the most effective.

No wonder Floyd didn't want them testing.

Also Floyd was not on any USADA testing program, giving him huge windows to use PEDs.

And I thought he wanted to clean up boxing"peeleft:

[Robbie Barrett]

9. What is a retroactive TUE?
Up

There are situations for which TUEs may be granted retroactively. The evaluation process is identical to the standard TUE application procedure i.e. the TUEC evaluates the application and issues its decision. The ISTUE stipulates which situations may result in the granting of a retroactive TUE, as follows:

Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary*; or
Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the athlete to submit, or the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or
Applicable rules required the athlete or permitted the athlete to apply for a retroactive TUE. This is applicable to Persons who are not International-Level or National-Level athletes (Code Article 4.4.5) and (where the relevant NADO so chooses) to National-Level Athletes in sports specified by the relevant NADO (ISTUE Article 5.1 Comment); or
[Comment: Such athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out in ISTUE Article 4.1, should an application for a retroactive TUE be necessary following Sample collection.]
It is agreed, by WADA and by the ADO to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.

*A medical emergency or acute medical situation occurs when the athlete's medical condition justifies immediate Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Method and failure to treat immediately could significantly put the athlete’s health at risk. It is always preferable to address a TUE application prospectively rather than retrospectively. ADOs granting TUEs should have internal procedures to expedite the evaluation and granting of TUE for emergency situations, whenever possible, and without putting the athlete’s health at risk.



So what was this medical emergency that Floyd had?

Has he ever suffered from this after any other weigh in?

Why is it being kept secret to what issues he had?

Why is USADA not being transparent with allowing an athlete to take a banned substance?

You skip the bit?

"Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the athlete to submit, or the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection"

[uppercut510]

Have you been living under a rock mate?

lol im just being sarcastic