Originally posted by Hype Job
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What's with the notion that we should root for Floyd just because he's a boxer?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The_Sandman View PostIt means that a person who boxed and stuck with only boxing for 40 years lost to a guy who started off as a plumber, and boxed a little bit, and committed to other disciplines in another sport. It not only takes away from the sport of boxing, but it takes away from the level of commitment and dedication to one and only one discipline. I've always prided myself as a boxing fan rather than an MMA fan because I favored a person who put 100% at one craft than 25% in Muay Thai, 40% BJJ, 35% boxing, 10% karate. McGregor winning means that 35% level of commitment just defeated 100% level of commitment. (These numbers are just spnhu eculations)
Superb post...and why I'm hoping Conor eats canvas
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostThe question is simple. Name a welterweight that would have made it through that gauntlet undefeated.
Truth is we'll never know because no one other than Floyd fought that list of fighters. That's like me asking if Mayweather can go through DLHs resume undefeated. Truth is no one knows. But don't try to push a hypothetical scenario that you can't prove as fact. Do you know the definition of fact?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostUmmm actually I gave you 2 names to your hypothetical scenario. You decided to use triangle theories as rationale to counter my argument.
Truth is we'll never know because no one other than Floyd fought that list of fighters. That's like me asking if Mayweather can go through DLHs resume undefeated. Truth is no one knows. But don't try to push a hypothetical scenario that you can't prove as fact. Do you know the definition of fact?
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostKhan lost four times to a less difficult series of opponents
Pac got KOd by Singsiurat. Who's a lesser opponent. Singsurat or Cotto?
Marquez lost to Chris John, but beat Pac. Who's the lesser opponent?
Khan lost to Prescott but beat Maidana. Who's the lesser opponent?
Canelo almost got KOd by Cottos brother, but not Miguel. Who's the lesser opponent?
You are an idiot for not only trying to pass a hypothetical fantasy question off as fact, but even a bigger idiot for using a triangle theory as justification. Oh, and outside of Canelo, how many losses did that list of opponents have and at what point in their careers did Floyd fight them?
And why are you calling that list of fighters a murderer's row? Are you seriously ******ed??
Comment
-
Originally posted by SonnyboyReturns View PostIf you really think about it, it's not just Floyd's legacy on the line. It's the legacy all the previous ATGs in this sport going as far back as SRR and even further.
Conor beating Floyd would invalidate the entire history of boxing. The Ali - Frazier rivalry, Hagler - Hearns, Duran-Leonard et al. Not only that, it would be the biggest upset in boxing history.
You'll never hear the end of it from MMA fans. If by some miracle it happens Boxing would become a running joke, a punchline.
Comment
-
Void's a worthless sack of **** whose never contributed anything but negativity to this sport and this ****ty farce is just another example of his toxic presence/influence, but I'd happily support him maiming this annoying fenian f*ggot and ending his career and any future earning capacity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View PostI don't think one is "real fighting", and the other is, "half fighting". They both have their strengths and weaknesses, and yes, they BOTH have limitations, and potential that neither has. And they both have similarities.
Comment
Comment