Dillian Whyte "We've Made Wilder An Improved Offer 4.5million + US TV Revenue"

[LetOutTheCage]

Don't really understand, Whyte has got to be an easier fight than Stiverne, and he pays like 3 or 4, maybe 5 times as much too.

Interesting, why do you think that?

[rickJen]

So Wilder can't accept all roads lead to AJ.
And the way to get there is dismantle everyone along the way.
He doesn't want to, and wants a shortcut after avoiding
the dirty work of dismantling the past prime Klitschko. What a joke.
It's not like he's being offered $400K. He's being offered $4 mil.

[_Maxi]

See y'all are all hating on Wilder, calling him a ducker and a coward, but he's gotten Hearns and Whyte to improve their offer multiple times. The man knows how to negotiate. He looks like a genius right now, while y'all would have had him take the first offer.

This is very true aswell.

[The Gambler1981]

Blindly?? Lmao.. I've just give you a few examples when people said Hearn is lying but he lived up to his word. There's many more examples where he has done exactly what he said. Why don't you give me an example of why he can't be trusted? You are a sheep.. There's loads of people like you. Many promoters talk **** and never back it up but Hearn has a good track record.. You can't even give me one example of when he said something but didn't live up to it.. SHEEP.

You are obviously feeling some kind of way because I wrote two line asking for proof and you gave me three a three paragraph diatribe full of hog wash and opinions about other fans rather than providing real proof of your words. You not only blindly believe Hearn you paint with a broad brush giving examples that mean nothing because Hearn is a boxing promoter sometimes they do come through but often they are full of ****. I expected him to come through on Wlad a big fight at a good time to make. The Brook fight had to happen and it wouldn't have happened if it was Hearn's choice he did what his guy wanted.

So in short you are the sheep because you are blindly believing a guy based on a couple unlike examples, when boxing promoters should never be taken at face value. A rookie naive view or straight up dishonest take your pick~

[NahMean]

You are obviously feeling some kind of way because I wrote two line asking for proof and you gave me three a three paragraph diatribe full of hog wash and opinions about other fans rather than providing real proof of your words. You not only blindly believe Hearn you paint with a broad brush giving examples that mean nothing because Hearn is a boxing promoter sometimes they do come through but often they are full of ****. I expected him to come through on Wlad a big fight at a good time to make. The Brook fight had to happen and it wouldn't have happened if it was Hearn's choice he did what his guy wanted.

So in short you are the sheep because you are blindly believing a guy based on a couple unlike examples, when boxing promoters should never be taken at face value. A rookie naive view or straight up dishonest take your pick~

Wheres your proof.. ???? I'm still waiting on why promoters should never be taken at face value.. Sheep. like I said I had sheep like you telling me Hearn is lying about AJ vs Vlad, Brook vs Spence.. Pulev and Ortiz said they wont step aside but they have now.. Brook got extensions when IBF said they would strip him, they didnt.. Indongo was due to get stripped, he hasnt.. that's enough "PROOF" for me to take Hearn's world since he has a history track record of getting his way with sanctioning bodies. Why would he make 4 offers to Al Haymon if that fight could never happen?? Go watch IFL interview where Hearn says he had a meeting with WBC president and got the go ahead for Stiverne step aside and he is confident Stiverne will take step aside if Wilder accepts the offer.

http://********/do0XPHRl1sg?a

Wheres your proof? I'll wait.

[original zero]

I'm still waiting on why promoters should never be taken at face value.

Because they are professional liars. That's their job.

[NahMean]

Because they are professional liars. That's their job.

They all exaggerate to sell fights but I'v followed AJsince the begining and Hearn did exacly what he said. People said Hearn was lying about the Whyte fight!! They said Hearn would never put him in there with Whyte who beat him in the amateurs.. But the fight happened.

They said the same about Brook vs Spence and AJ vs Vlad.. Why on earth would Hearn make offers to Wilder if that fight could never take place? Like I said he has a good track record with dealing with sanctioning bodies so I believe him.. IBF stripped Fury within days.. they didnt strip AJ and many people cried about it saying Fury wasnt treated fair!

Wheres the proof that should make us doubt Hearn cant make a deal with WBC?? Why would he lie about meeting with Mauricio Sulaiman and and being granted step aside?? I want to see proof where Mauricio Sulaiman said he didnt have a meeting with Hearn.

[Enzo Mc is SHIT]

Wilder needs to think about the big picture here. The reason Hearn's willing to throw so much money at this is to build the AJ vs Wilder unification. Not only will Wilder make a load of money fighting Whyte, but he'll be increasing his share of the big one.

[Butt stuff]

Interesting, why do you think that?

It's not entirely accurate but I'd rate Arreola (at that time) higher than Whyte who arguably lost (and almost got KO'd) against a shot chisora.

[original zero]

They all exaggerate to sell fights

I'm not saying Hearn is the most dishonest promoter. He's actually one of the most honest of the major promoters. But he's still a promoter and taking anything he says at face value is extremely naive. His public statements are designed to gain favor for his fighters and sway public sentiment against other fighters. Just because he's slicker and doesn't blatantly lie as often as promoters of the past doesn't mean people should blindly believe anything he says.

Wheres the proof that should make us doubt Hearn cant make a deal with WBC?? Why would he lie about meeting with Mauricio Sulaiman and and being granted step aside?? I want to see proof where Mauricio Sulaiman said he didnt have a meeting with Hearn.

The WBC has never had a problem with step aside deals. No meeting with Mauricio is needed for that. But it's the way Hearn speaks about it which is designed to trick fans into thinking Wilder is ducking Whyte.

When the truth is that a meeting with Mauricio is literally pointless. Hearn would have to have a meeting with Don King. Getting the WBC on board accomplishes nothing. When are they NOT on board when the other side agrees to a step aside fee?

This whole campaign by Hearn to smear Wilder has worked beautifully, but everybody who fell for it should feel like a ****ing idiot.

One day you guys cry that Wilder is a fool or a coward for not accepting 3 million. Suddenly the offer is 4.5 million. So who was really the fool? The people saying he should accept. Where are their apologies?