Why fight Jacobs when he can fight Saunders get that strap then fight cantnelo become lineal have all belts and then rematch Jacobs? Wtf is wrong with that? How can you hate that and talk shi t? Only flo mos turned wardtards will criticize it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: No Robbery at MSG, But Golovkin's Future Plans are Criminal
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postthis writer, NAILED IT !!
nice article Mr Fitzsimmons, props to you Sir
not one mention of that super-****ty WBA regular title
the following, is gold.....
"You want to save boxing and bring it back to some semblance of public consciousness, have your champions -- like Triple-G, in this case -- stop this "I need all the belts" nonsense. It's an easy path to easy fights, rather than forcing him to pursue greatness with another Jacobs fight, or by moving up."
aboutfkntime someone called out GGG on his bullshht
this journalist retained his honesty and integrity, how about some of you other hacks do the same
The benefit of unification, is that ONCE he has all the belts, all true contenders must go through him. That creates the best fights in the long run.
It still puzzles me how so many fight fans don't see that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuckguy View PostWhy fight Jacobs when he can fight Saunders get that strap then fight cantnelo become lineal have all belts and then rematch Jacobs? Wtf is wrong with that? How can you hate that and talk shi t? Only flo mos turned wardtards will criticize it.
because he has Jacobs problems
because, hoping that Jacobs will just disappear is fkn lame.....
because taking easy fights in lieu of harder fights, is lame..... and Golovkin has been top-toeing through the tulips his whole career
how about Ward fight Chavez for cash, and get back to Kovalev laterz?
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postbecause he has Jacobs problems
because, hoping that Jacobs will just disappear is fkn lame.....
because taking easy fights in lieu of harder fights, is lame..... and Golovkin has been top-toeing through the tulips his whole career
how about Ward fight Chavez for cash, and get back to Kovalev laterz?
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postname a fight where a guy who is NOT a draw turned down 15mil?
Canelo offered Golovkin 15mil, not 15 chickens
As far as your question goes no b side would ever get offer 15mill and iam not saying ggg is a draw ethier, But their are reasons supposedly he got offer 15 mill because the profit would be huge for canelo so offering 15 mil to Ggg is pocket change considering what total profit would be. This isn't rocket science it's not hard to figure out but any fighter that would take a flat fee is a total moron.Last edited by Wizardsh; 03-21-2017, 11:37 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LoadedWraps View PostThe thing is, while that's true in the short term, think of the bigger picture. The fights may be "easy" now, but that's only because the paper champs exist in the first place - not Golovkin's fault.
The benefit of unification, is that ONCE he has all the belts, all true contenders must go through him. That creates the best fights in the long run.
It still puzzles me how so many fight fans don't see that.
I take your point..... but I'm sorry, the writer has a better one
"stop this "I need all the belts" nonsense. It's an easy path to easy fights, rather than forcing him to pursue greatness with another Jacobs fight, or by moving up."
Saunders has been champion for awhile, and the only time Team Golovkin have entertained Saunders they offered him 1.5mil..... Saunders laughed, Loeffler spun the "we can't make them fight us" line, and then he fought Dominic Wade
why this sudden interest now ?
Golovkin has been fk'ing around for years..... his career is molasses-level SLOOOOOOOOOW..... and Jacobs is clearly a better fight than Saunders
it will seem like Golovkin is running from the first sign of adversity..... and if they do avoid that rematch, I'm sure that will be the reason why
Comment
-
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostI want him to sign a contract saying he will fight Canelo in September, as long as G wins over whoever he wants in June and Canelo beats JCC Jr. G and his followers were saying this last year and all we got to see was Wade and a welterweight. Sign the contract and everyone will shut up. If not, do what you did with Ward and admit Canelo is currently too good now but that G might consider it in a couple of years when G is even closer to the end of his boxing career.
No one hates G for his style, but for his steadfast refusal to test himself against top opposition. Canelo has more big names on his resume than G, and Canelo is over a decade younger. That is just plain ridiculous.
Anything before that is just blah, blah, blah - simple
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wizardsh View PostStop the bs and stop being emotional. No one conducts business in boxing that way. You are acting like flat is the norm when in reality it's bull$!t. Maybe ggg should have taken the 15mil that's even if it's true. I am glad ggg didn't take the offer because it would have brought a new wave of bull$h!t to boxing we don't need. Could you imagine boxing with flat fees no major fights would ever happen. Fights are already hard to make as is.
As far as your question goes no b side would ever get offer 15mill and iam not saying ggg is a draw ethier, But their are reasons supposedly he got offer 15 mill because the profit would be huge for canelo so offering 15 mil to Ggg is pocket change considering what total profit would be. This isn't rocket science it's not hard to figure out but any fighter that would take flat fee is a total moron.
on what planet is turning down 15mil " normal " ?
seriously, what fighter not named Floyd or Manny even gets offered 15mil, let alone turns it down?
good luck telling a historian that Golovkin avoided Canelo because 15mil was not enough money
guys like Hagler, and even Hopkins..... must think that is absolutely ridiculous
it appears you can't even pay Golovkin to get himself into a meaningful fight
#pacifistyo
Comment
Comment