Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[travestyny]

3. So how did SMRTL and QUEST do their analysis on this? Please provide all the information and data. Including if they were testing on the same or different urine sample, same protocol, equipment, labs, ..... IF NOT, all you are doing is helping my case out!!! In all honesty, I have no allegiance to either SMRTL or QUEST.

So now you are playing ****** (possibly not playing). Now for this case you need to know if it was the same urine sample, same protocol, same equipment, same labs. LMAO. I find the above statement tooo damn funny. Look at him squirmmmmm!

YAWNNNNNN. NO ONE AGREES WITH YOU. NO ONE.


Did you explain why Quest had no adverse finding when Silva admit to taking the drug?


Different lab. Different protocols, right? On the same day, right? Now you need more information???? LMAO.

Still waiting for your explanation. Why are you DEFLECTING!!!! LMAOOOOO!!!!!

You amuse me. LET IT GO. YOU LOST.

[ADP02]

So...you already knew that the labs don't do urine testing for DEHP.....yet four days ago you were just saying that the labs do urine testing for DEHP????

LMAOOOOO. THIS IS WHAT YOU COME BACK WITH AFTER 4 DAYS. REALLY? YOU ALREADY KNEW THAT YOU WERE BASING YOUR BULLSHlT ON FALSE INFORMATION?
LMAOOOOOOO!!!!!!


DUDE, GIVE THE **** UP. YOU GOT OWNED! YOU JUST COULDN'T ADMIT THAT YOU WERE WRONG, HUH? IT'S BEEN FUN BEATING THE SHlT OUT OF YOU ALL OVER THESE BOARDS. LMAO. THANKS FOR THE LAUGHS, CHUMP

ADP02 Four Days Ago

Aint no coming back from the dead, homie. Time to accept you've been destroyed.

TRYING TO DELFECT I SEE!

This is about YOU thinking that the best option was to have USADA not leave a paper trail. Again, if the LABs came back with a positive result then Floyd was finished!!!!! So you are WRONG!!!!!!!!!!


As stated, I had read that they were still able to use their tools to verify if the athlete was using an IV. Did you not read that too or are YOU DEFLECTING AGAIN? CHUMP!

[ADP02]

YAWNNNNNN. NO ONE AGREES WITH YOU. NO ONE.


Did you explain why Quest had no adverse finding when Silva admit to taking the drug?


Different lab. Different protocols, right? On the same day, right? Now you need more information???? LMAO.

Still waiting for your explanation. Why are you DEFLECTING!!!! LMAOOOOO!!!!!

You amuse me. LET IT GO. YOU LOST.

Wait. So we are discussing Diaz and YOU bring up (DEFLECT TO) Silva and I ask YOU to clarify and you do not in your response and I'm deflecting?

NO THAT MEANS THAT YOU ARE DELFECTING, DEFLECTOR!!!!!!!!!!

[travestyny]

TRYING TO DELFECT I SEE!

This is about YOU thinking that the best option was to have USADA not leave a paper trail. Again, if the LABs came back with a positive result then Floyd was finished!!!!! So you are WRONG!!!!!!!!!!


As stated, I had read that they were still able to use their tools to verify if the athlete was using an IV. Did you not read that too or are YOU DEFLECTING AGAIN? CHUMP!

LMAO. MORE OWNAGE COMING!

"WADA's Laboratory Committee decided at the time that there were alternative ways to collect the evidence to the one proposed by Prof. Segura's research," WADA's media relations manager Terence O'Rorke said.

The Athlete Biological Passport is used to check for IV use. Already told you this. Don't believe me?

REGARDING THE ABANDONED PLASTICIZER TEST:
It remains to be seen whether USADA plans to use that test in its anti-doping program with the UFC. In an email to MMAjunkie, USADA officials would only say that they were planning to use “the most state-of-the art tools to detect prohibited substances and methods on the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List,” including various “direct and indirect detection techniques.”

“The Athlete Biological Passport, alone or in combination with non-analytical intelligence, is a proven powerful tool to deter athletes from doping and assert anti-doping rule violations on those who cheat,” USADA officials wrote in the email.
http://mmajunkie.com/2015/07/for-ufc...will-it-matter

R.I.P

[travestyny]

Wait. So we are discussing Diaz and YOU bring up (DEFLECT TO) Silva and I ask YOU to clarify and you do not in your response and I'm deflecting?

NO THAT MEANS THAT YOU ARE DELFECTING, DEFLECTOR!!!!!!!!!!

You are far too ****** to follow. I'm pointing out that you are misinterpreting the MRO's statement, just as I told you from the beginning.

That the labs use different protocols does not prove that both labs work is verified. If it did, the MRO wouldn't have a job, you clown. He is clearly telling you which lab got it wrong. You don't seem to get that a lab can get it wrong.

Silva's case proves that a lab got it wrong, does it not? Please answer.

[ADP02]

LMAO. MORE OWNAGE COMING!

REGARDING THE ABANDONED PLASTICIZER TEST:
It remains to be seen whether USADA plans to use that test in its anti-doping program with the UFC. In an email to MMAjunkie, USADA officials would only say that they were planning to use “the most state-of-the art tools to detect prohibited substances and methods on the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List,” including various “direct and indirect detection techniques.”

“The Athlete Biological Passport, alone or in combination with non-analytical intelligence, is a proven powerful tool to deter athletes from doping and assert anti-doping rule violations on those who cheat,” USADA officials wrote in the email.
http://mmajunkie.com/2015/07/for-ufc...will-it-matter

R.I.P

and that helps you?

That was one of several things that I had read. Successful or not, it proves that they have stated that they have tools to "try" to combat IV use.

So if Floyd would not have requested a RETRO TUE, and they would have found out ..... YOU WOULD BE WRONG!!!!

STOP DEFLECTING ......
It brings back the point that YOU WERE WRONG THAT USADA should have not left a paper trail. BOOOOOOM!!!!

[travestyny]

[B][I][U][SIZE="4"]
Again, if the LABs came back with a positive result then Floyd was finished!!!!! So you are WRONG!!!!!!!!!!

Maybe you should brush up on your information. The container would be one used for normal saline, correct? Not for blood transfusions, correct. Might it have been...like this:

NORMAL SALINE

The flexible container is made with non-latex plastic materials specially designed for a wide range of parenteral drugs including those requiring delivery in containers made of polyolefins or polypropylene. For example, the AVIVA container system is compatible with and appropriate for use in the admixture and administration of paclitaxel. In addition, the AVIVA container system is compatible with and appropriate for use in the admixture and administration of all drugs deemed compatible with existing polyvinyl chloride container systems. The solution contact materials do not contain PVC, DEHP, or other plasticizers.
Last reviewed on RxList: 12/2/2010

http://www.rxlist.com/normal-saline-drug.htm

LMAOOOOOO. YOU ARE GETTING BEAT INTO THE GROUND!

[travestyny]

And that helps you?

That was one of several things that i had read. Successful or not, it proves that they have stated that they have tools to "try" to combat iv use.

So if floyd would not have requested a retro tue, and they would have found out ..... You would be wrong!!!!

Stop deflecting ......
It brings back the point that you were wrong that usada should have not left a paper trail. Boooooom!!!!

lmao. Look up, son. Your receiving of this asskicking hasn't ended yet

SO LIKE I WAS SAYING...ABOUT THAT PAPER TRAIL. WHY????


LMAOOOOOOO!

[ADP02]

You are far too ****** to follow. I'm pointing out that you are misinterpreting the MRO's statement, just as I told you from the beginning.

That the labs use different protocols does not prove that both labs work is verified. If it did, the MRO wouldn't have a job, you clown. He is clearly telling you which lab got it wrong. You don't seem to get that a lab can get it wrong.

Silva's case proves that a lab got it wrong, does it not? Please answer.

Harder to dispute a positive result on all. The onus was on Diaz's team to prove and the best and easiest way was by having sample B tested. Again, they didn't because they knew it would come back positive. That is the ONLY reason and the MRO knew because Diaz told him!!!



What does the Russian case prove? SMRTL missed that positive one when 4 others had it right! BUT YOU DEFLECTED THAT!!! DEFLECTOR STRIKES AGAIN!!!!!!!!!

[ADP02]

Maybe you should brush up on your information. The container would be one used for normal saline, correct? Not for blood transfusions, correct. Might it have been...like this:

NORMAL SALINE

The flexible container is made with non-latex plastic materials specially designed for a wide range of parenteral drugs including those requiring delivery in containers made of polyolefins or polypropylene. For example, the AVIVA container system is compatible with and appropriate for use in the admixture and administration of paclitaxel. In addition, the AVIVA container system is compatible with and appropriate for use in the admixture and administration of all drugs deemed compatible with existing polyvinyl chloride container systems. The solution contact materials do not contain PVC, DEHP, or other plasticizers.
Last reviewed on RxList: 12/2/2010

http://www.rxlist.com/normal-saline-drug.htm

LMAOOOOOO. YOU ARE GETTING BEAT INTO THE GROUND!

lmao. Look up, son. Your receiving of this asskicking hasn't ended yet

SO LIKE I WAS SAYING...ABOUT THAT PAPER TRAIL. WHY????


LMAOOOOOOO!

Wait. YOU already brought up that they have tools to try to combat IV use. Now you are denying?

This is getting funnier and funnier ....