Jack Dempsey vs Today's Heavyweights
Collapse
-
-
Huck 210
Dempsey 187 (vs willard)
Kovalev 188
Hopkins 182
Pascal 185
On par with modern LHWs.
Perhaps as he aged he would have stopped cutting and fought at cruiser.
Not a chance of heavy.
Often wish we would drop division names and jsut call them by their numbers, if nothing else then to stop these marciano/dempsey/louis VS klitschko/valuev/lewis type threads.
HW division was a completely different division back then. guys like willard were freaks, not the norm.
Nobody could say what would have happened if he'd have been born in the 80's and been active today. There's too many variables. But he was in peak condition just below 200 pounds. I doubt you'd have seen the best of him had he have had to dehydrate down to 175.
Huck could slim down, and again, Lebedev used to be a CW.
CW is obviously anything between 175-200, so there's no reason to think that Jack wouldn't have been a CW.
Obviously I can't prove it, but I'd bet that Jack's percentage of body fat was lower than the guys who you've listed, with their fight night weight after rehydrating.Comment
-
Jack Dempsey, the man often considered one of the hardest hitters of all time. The man who is often considered one of the toughest Heavyweights of all time. The man who demolished a oger 100 lbs heavier and 6 inches taller.
Dempsey would easy compete in the top 5Comment
-
Do you know why people cut weight in sports?
Froch is almost completely identical to Dempsey, height-weight. Even in style. Albeit Froch is there to be hit and isn't as refined as Dempsey but they are in all actuality quite similar.
Froch being 6'1", 75in reach, and weighing damn near the same if not, then more than Dempsey could compete at HW just like Dempsey. But he does not.
Why is that?
Froch's peak weight was at SMW, weighing around 175 on fight night.
Jack's peak weight was between 185-195.
Not only was Jack naturally bigger, he was also faster and hit a lot harder.
Froch wasn't big enough, fast enough, or powerful enough, to fight at the higher weights.Comment
-
Stop with the madness.
Froch's peak weight was at SMW, weighing around 175 on fight night.
Jack's peak weight was between 185-195.
Not only was Jack naturally bigger, he was also faster and hit a lot harder.
Froch wasn't big enough, fast enough, or powerful enough to fight at the higher weights.Comment
-
Look at the guys who you've favoured over Jack, just on the grounds that they were bigger, whilst completely IGNORING every other factor.
Clueless.
Name me today's top 15 HW's, and tell me which of them were faster than Jack.Comment
-
That looked like this. Come fight night.
**** out of here. He cut maybe 6-8lbs between chilling and actual fighting. He basically fought where he walks around.
You're a clown.Comment
-
Seriously, your posts are cringeworthy.
Of course Carl is out of fighting shape, walking around at over 200 pounds you fool
AGAIN:
Jack's peak weight was between 185-195.
That means he was roughly 10-20 pounds HEAVIER than what Carl was on fight night.
He was also: stronger, faster, more powerful, and he had a COMPLETELEY DIFFERENT style.
Stop digging a bigger hole for yourself.
Their styles are nothing alike, and to say Carl is the modern day Dempsey, is probably the ******est thing I've ever read on here since being a member.Comment
-
Comment